Evaluating the safety and efficacy of a novel polysaccharide hemostatic system during surgery: A multicenter multispecialty prospective randomized controlled trial

IF 1.4 Q3 SURGERY Surgery open science Pub Date : 2024-05-03 DOI:10.1016/j.sopen.2024.04.009
Michael G. House MD , Robin Kim MD , Elaine E. Tseng MD , Ronald P. Kaufman Jr MD , Marc R. Moon MD , Adam Yopp MD , Viraj A. Master MD
{"title":"Evaluating the safety and efficacy of a novel polysaccharide hemostatic system during surgery: A multicenter multispecialty prospective randomized controlled trial","authors":"Michael G. House MD ,&nbsp;Robin Kim MD ,&nbsp;Elaine E. Tseng MD ,&nbsp;Ronald P. Kaufman Jr MD ,&nbsp;Marc R. Moon MD ,&nbsp;Adam Yopp MD ,&nbsp;Viraj A. Master MD","doi":"10.1016/j.sopen.2024.04.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Operative blood loss is associated with postoperative morbidity and mortality in surgery. Hemostatic agents are used as adjuncts for hemostasis during surgery and help to prevent postoperative bleeding. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of an investigational polysaccharide hemostatic (PH) topical product compared to a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved control in clinical use comprising microporous polysaccharide hemospheres (MPH) to achieve hemostasis of bleeding surfaces during surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>This prospective multicenter trial enrolled patients undergoing open elective cardiac, general, or urologic surgery. Patients were stratified by bleeding severity and therapeutic area, then randomized 1:1 to receive PH or MPH. Bleeding assessments occurred intraoperatively using a novel bleeding assessment methodology. Primary endpoint was noninferiority as compared with control via effective hemostasis at 7 min. Patients were monitored and followed daily in the postoperative period until time of discharge and again at 6 weeks. Overall survival was assessed in oncology patients at 24 months. Safety of PH vs. MPH was determined by comparing relative incidence of adverse events.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Across 19 centers, 324 (161 PH, 163 MPH) patients were randomized (48 % general surgery, 27 % cardiac surgery, and 25 % urologic surgery). PH was noninferior to MPH and met the primary endpoint of hemostatic success at 7 min at a non-inferiority margin of 10 %. No significant differences were found in adverse event rates. Six deaths were reported within the 6-week follow-up period. No difference in overall survival was observed at 2 years (76 % PH vs. 74 % MPH, <em>P</em> = .66) for patients undergoing cancer operations.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Across three therapeutic areas, PH was noninferior to MPH at all hemostasis assessment time points with no safety concerns. PH is an effective alternative to MPH for hemostasis during surgery.</p><p><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg> Identifier: <span>NCT02359994</span><svg><path></path></svg></p></div>","PeriodicalId":74892,"journal":{"name":"Surgery open science","volume":"19 ","pages":"Pages 205-211"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589845024000617/pdfft?md5=43bd953c9a3c5133f53c0ca6a92f24d6&pid=1-s2.0-S2589845024000617-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery open science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589845024000617","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Operative blood loss is associated with postoperative morbidity and mortality in surgery. Hemostatic agents are used as adjuncts for hemostasis during surgery and help to prevent postoperative bleeding. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of an investigational polysaccharide hemostatic (PH) topical product compared to a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved control in clinical use comprising microporous polysaccharide hemospheres (MPH) to achieve hemostasis of bleeding surfaces during surgery.

Study design

This prospective multicenter trial enrolled patients undergoing open elective cardiac, general, or urologic surgery. Patients were stratified by bleeding severity and therapeutic area, then randomized 1:1 to receive PH or MPH. Bleeding assessments occurred intraoperatively using a novel bleeding assessment methodology. Primary endpoint was noninferiority as compared with control via effective hemostasis at 7 min. Patients were monitored and followed daily in the postoperative period until time of discharge and again at 6 weeks. Overall survival was assessed in oncology patients at 24 months. Safety of PH vs. MPH was determined by comparing relative incidence of adverse events.

Results

Across 19 centers, 324 (161 PH, 163 MPH) patients were randomized (48 % general surgery, 27 % cardiac surgery, and 25 % urologic surgery). PH was noninferior to MPH and met the primary endpoint of hemostatic success at 7 min at a non-inferiority margin of 10 %. No significant differences were found in adverse event rates. Six deaths were reported within the 6-week follow-up period. No difference in overall survival was observed at 2 years (76 % PH vs. 74 % MPH, P = .66) for patients undergoing cancer operations.

Conclusion

Across three therapeutic areas, PH was noninferior to MPH at all hemostasis assessment time points with no safety concerns. PH is an effective alternative to MPH for hemostasis during surgery.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02359994

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估新型多糖止血系统在手术中的安全性和有效性:多中心多专科前瞻性随机对照试验
背景手术失血与手术后发病率和死亡率有关。止血剂是手术中止血的辅助用药,有助于防止术后出血。我们评估了一种研究性多糖止血剂(PH)局部产品与美国食品药品管理局(FDA)批准的临床使用对照组(包括微孔多糖血球(MPH))的安全性和有效性,以实现手术中出血面的止血。患者按出血严重程度和治疗部位进行分层,然后按 1:1 随机分配接受 PH 或 MPH 治疗。术中使用新颖的出血评估方法进行出血评估。主要终点是与对照组相比,7 分钟有效止血时间的非劣效性。术后每天对患者进行监测和随访,直至出院,并在 6 周后再次进行监测和随访。肿瘤患者的总生存期为 24 个月。通过比较不良事件的相对发生率来确定PH与MPH的安全性。结果19个中心的324名(161名PH,163名MPH)患者接受了随机治疗(普外科48%,心脏外科27%,泌尿外科25%)。PH 非劣效性优于 MPH,达到了 7 分钟止血成功的主要终点,非劣效性差值为 10%。不良事件发生率无明显差异。在6周的随访期内,有6例死亡报告。接受癌症手术的患者2年后的总生存率无差异(PH为76%,MPH为74%,P = .66)。在手术止血方面,PH 是 MPH 的有效替代品:NCT02359994
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
66 days
期刊最新文献
Thoracic surgery - An underestimated dream job? See one, teach yourself one, do one: Barriers and opportunities in self-administered training and assessment for global surgical education Management of Colorectal Cancer with Synchronous Liver Metastases: A systematic review of national and International Clinical Guidelines (CoSMIC-G) Primary delayed gastric emptying after pylorus-resecting pancreatoduodenectomy: A matched-pair comparison of Roux-en-Y vs. Billroth-II reconstruction Immersive collaborative virtual reality for case-based graduate student teaching in thoracic surgery: A piloting study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1