Przemysław Waszak , Ewelina Łuszczak , Paweł Zagożdżon
{"title":"COVID-19 in Polish-language social media - misinformation vs government information","authors":"Przemysław Waszak , Ewelina Łuszczak , Paweł Zagożdżon","doi":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>During the COVID-19 pandemic, a surge of conspiracy theories and misinformation proliferated across social media platforms. Recognizing the severity of the issue, medical associations began to regard it as a significant threat to public health systems. The objective of this study was to quantify the proportion of COVID-19 misinformation and official government information within the most frequently shared items on Polish social media.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The analysis utilized the BuzzSumo Enterprise Application. Polish-language social media posts from January 1 to June 30, 2022, were scrutinized using keywords such as \"COVID,\" \"koronawirus,\" or \"SARS-CoV-2.\" A comprehensive report was generated, encompassing shares, comments, likes, and reactions (engagements). We analyzed the top 40 items that generated the most engagement. To ensure accuracy, two of the authors, both medical doctors, independently assessed each of them for potential misinformation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified 161,404 items in the Polish language that were shared on social media, representing 41,432,352 engagements. The top 40 items (0.02 % of all items) accounted for 7.71 % of engagements (3,194,900). Four items classified as misinformation accounted for 7.7 % of the Top 40 items, accumulating 244,700 engagements. All identified items were labeled as \"manipulated news\" due to their reliance on unverified or inappropriately interpreted data; none were classified as fabricated news. Government sources accounted for 4.1 % of the Top 40 items, accumulating 130,800 engagements.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study highlights the significant prevalence of COVID-19 misinformation. Remedial measures should be implemented, addressing both social media platforms and real-life contexts, to enhance public health literacy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48672,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy and Technology","volume":"13 2","pages":"Article 100871"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883724000340/pdfft?md5=8ab8cd233770f28992b0a6c4d1123ab3&pid=1-s2.0-S2211883724000340-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883724000340","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
During the COVID-19 pandemic, a surge of conspiracy theories and misinformation proliferated across social media platforms. Recognizing the severity of the issue, medical associations began to regard it as a significant threat to public health systems. The objective of this study was to quantify the proportion of COVID-19 misinformation and official government information within the most frequently shared items on Polish social media.
Methods
The analysis utilized the BuzzSumo Enterprise Application. Polish-language social media posts from January 1 to June 30, 2022, were scrutinized using keywords such as "COVID," "koronawirus," or "SARS-CoV-2." A comprehensive report was generated, encompassing shares, comments, likes, and reactions (engagements). We analyzed the top 40 items that generated the most engagement. To ensure accuracy, two of the authors, both medical doctors, independently assessed each of them for potential misinformation.
Results
We identified 161,404 items in the Polish language that were shared on social media, representing 41,432,352 engagements. The top 40 items (0.02 % of all items) accounted for 7.71 % of engagements (3,194,900). Four items classified as misinformation accounted for 7.7 % of the Top 40 items, accumulating 244,700 engagements. All identified items were labeled as "manipulated news" due to their reliance on unverified or inappropriately interpreted data; none were classified as fabricated news. Government sources accounted for 4.1 % of the Top 40 items, accumulating 130,800 engagements.
Conclusions
This study highlights the significant prevalence of COVID-19 misinformation. Remedial measures should be implemented, addressing both social media platforms and real-life contexts, to enhance public health literacy.
期刊介绍:
Health Policy and Technology (HPT), is the official journal of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine (FPM), a cross-disciplinary journal, which focuses on past, present and future health policy and the role of technology in clinical and non-clinical national and international health environments.
HPT provides a further excellent way for the FPM to continue to make important national and international contributions to development of policy and practice within medicine and related disciplines. The aim of HPT is to publish relevant, timely and accessible articles and commentaries to support policy-makers, health professionals, health technology providers, patient groups and academia interested in health policy and technology.
Topics covered by HPT will include:
- Health technology, including drug discovery, diagnostics, medicines, devices, therapeutic delivery and eHealth systems
- Cross-national comparisons on health policy using evidence-based approaches
- National studies on health policy to determine the outcomes of technology-driven initiatives
- Cross-border eHealth including health tourism
- The digital divide in mobility, access and affordability of healthcare
- Health technology assessment (HTA) methods and tools for evaluating the effectiveness of clinical and non-clinical health technologies
- Health and eHealth indicators and benchmarks (measure/metrics) for understanding the adoption and diffusion of health technologies
- Health and eHealth models and frameworks to support policy-makers and other stakeholders in decision-making
- Stakeholder engagement with health technologies (clinical and patient/citizen buy-in)
- Regulation and health economics