{"title":"New light on an old syndrome: Role of Api g 7 in mugwort pollen–related celery allergy","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jaci.2024.04.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Celery root<span><span> is known to cause severe allergic reactions in patients sensitized to </span>mugwort pollen.</span></p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>We studied clinically well-characterized patients with celery allergy by IgE testing with a comprehensive panel of celery allergens to disentangle the molecular basis of what is known as the celery–mugwort syndrome.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span><span>Patients with suspected food allergy to celery underwent a standardized interview. Main inclusion criteria were a positive food challenge with celery or an unambiguous case history of severe </span>anaphylaxis<span>. IgE to celery allergens (rApi g 1.01, rApi g 1.02, rApi g 2, rApi g 4<span>, nApi g 5, rApi g 6, rApi g 7) and to mugwort allergens (rArt v 1, rArt v 3, rArt v 4) were determined. IgE levels ≥0.35 kU</span></span></span><sub>A</sub>/L were regarded positive.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span><span>Seventy-nine patients with allergy to celery were included. Thirty patients had mild oral or rhinoconjunctival symptoms, and 49 had systemic reactions. Sixty-eight percent had IgE to celery extract, 80% to birch pollen, and 77% to mugwort pollen. A combination of Api g 1.01, 1.02, 4, 5, and 7 increased the diagnostic sensitivity for celery allergy to 92%. The </span>lipid transfer proteins Api g 2 and Api g 6 were not relevant in our celery-allergic population. IgE to Api g 7, detected in 52% of patients, correlated closely (</span><em>r</em> = 0.86) to Art v 1 from mugwort pollen. Eleven of 12 patients with monosensitization to Api g 7 were IgE negative to celery extract. The odds ratio for developing a severe anaphylactic reaction rather than only mild oral symptoms was about 6 times greater (odds ratio, 5.87; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-32.0; <em>P</em> = .0410) for Api g 7–sensitized versus –nonsensitized subjects.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There is an urgent need for routine diagnostic tests to assess sensitization to Api g 7, not only to increase test sensitivity but also to identify patients at risk of a severe allergic reaction to celery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14936,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091674924005025","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Celery root is known to cause severe allergic reactions in patients sensitized to mugwort pollen.
Objective
We studied clinically well-characterized patients with celery allergy by IgE testing with a comprehensive panel of celery allergens to disentangle the molecular basis of what is known as the celery–mugwort syndrome.
Methods
Patients with suspected food allergy to celery underwent a standardized interview. Main inclusion criteria were a positive food challenge with celery or an unambiguous case history of severe anaphylaxis. IgE to celery allergens (rApi g 1.01, rApi g 1.02, rApi g 2, rApi g 4, nApi g 5, rApi g 6, rApi g 7) and to mugwort allergens (rArt v 1, rArt v 3, rArt v 4) were determined. IgE levels ≥0.35 kUA/L were regarded positive.
Results
Seventy-nine patients with allergy to celery were included. Thirty patients had mild oral or rhinoconjunctival symptoms, and 49 had systemic reactions. Sixty-eight percent had IgE to celery extract, 80% to birch pollen, and 77% to mugwort pollen. A combination of Api g 1.01, 1.02, 4, 5, and 7 increased the diagnostic sensitivity for celery allergy to 92%. The lipid transfer proteins Api g 2 and Api g 6 were not relevant in our celery-allergic population. IgE to Api g 7, detected in 52% of patients, correlated closely (r = 0.86) to Art v 1 from mugwort pollen. Eleven of 12 patients with monosensitization to Api g 7 were IgE negative to celery extract. The odds ratio for developing a severe anaphylactic reaction rather than only mild oral symptoms was about 6 times greater (odds ratio, 5.87; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-32.0; P = .0410) for Api g 7–sensitized versus –nonsensitized subjects.
Conclusion
There is an urgent need for routine diagnostic tests to assess sensitization to Api g 7, not only to increase test sensitivity but also to identify patients at risk of a severe allergic reaction to celery.
背景众所周知,芹菜根会导致对艾草花粉过敏的患者出现严重过敏反应。目的我们通过对芹菜过敏原进行全面的 IgE 检测,研究了临床上特征明确的芹菜过敏患者,以揭示所谓的芹菜艾草综合征的分子基础。主要纳入标准为芹菜食物挑战阳性或有明确的严重过敏性休克病史。测定芹菜过敏原(rApi g 1.01、rApi g 1.02、rApi g 2、rApi g 4、nApi g 5、rApi g 6、rApi g 7)和艾草过敏原(rArt v 1、rArt v 3、rArt v 4)的 IgE。IgE水平≥0.35 kUA/L为阳性。30 名患者有轻微的口腔或鼻结膜症状,49 名患者有全身反应。68%的患者对芹菜提取物产生 IgE,80%的患者对桦树花粉产生 IgE,77%的患者对艾草花粉产生 IgE。Api g 1.01、1.02、4、5 和 7 的组合可将芹菜过敏的诊断灵敏度提高到 92%。脂质转移蛋白 Api g 2 和 Api g 6 与我们的芹菜过敏人群无关。在 52% 的患者中检测到的 Api g 7 IgE 与艾草花粉中的 Art v 1 密切相关(r = 0.86)。在对 Api g 7 单敏的 12 名患者中,有 11 人对芹菜提取物的 IgE 呈阴性。Api g 7致敏受试者与非致敏受试者发生严重过敏反应而非仅出现轻微口腔症状的几率比较大,前者约为后者的 6 倍(几率比,5.87;95% 置信区间,1.08-32.0;P = .0410)。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology is a prestigious publication that features groundbreaking research in the fields of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology. This influential journal publishes high-impact research papers that explore various topics, including asthma, food allergy, allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, primary immune deficiencies, occupational and environmental allergy, and other allergic and immunologic diseases. The articles not only report on clinical trials and mechanistic studies but also provide insights into novel therapies, underlying mechanisms, and important discoveries that contribute to our understanding of these diseases. By sharing this valuable information, the journal aims to enhance the diagnosis and management of patients in the future.