New light on an old syndrome: Role of Api g 7 in mugwort pollen–related celery allergy

IF 11.4 1区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jaci.2024.04.030
{"title":"New light on an old syndrome: Role of Api g 7 in mugwort pollen–related celery allergy","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jaci.2024.04.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Celery root<span><span> is known to cause severe allergic reactions in patients sensitized to </span>mugwort pollen.</span></p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>We studied clinically well-characterized patients with celery allergy by IgE testing with a comprehensive panel of celery allergens to disentangle the molecular basis of what is known as the celery–mugwort syndrome.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span><span>Patients with suspected food allergy to celery underwent a standardized interview. Main inclusion criteria were a positive food challenge with celery or an unambiguous case history of severe </span>anaphylaxis<span>. IgE to celery allergens (rApi g 1.01, rApi g 1.02, rApi g 2, rApi g 4<span>, nApi g 5, rApi g 6, rApi g 7) and to mugwort allergens (rArt v 1, rArt v 3, rArt v 4) were determined. IgE levels ≥0.35 kU</span></span></span><sub>A</sub>/L were regarded positive.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span><span>Seventy-nine patients with allergy to celery were included. Thirty patients had mild oral or rhinoconjunctival symptoms, and 49 had systemic reactions. Sixty-eight percent had IgE to celery extract, 80% to birch pollen, and 77% to mugwort pollen. A combination of Api g 1.01, 1.02, 4, 5, and 7 increased the diagnostic sensitivity for celery allergy to 92%. The </span>lipid transfer proteins Api g 2 and Api g 6 were not relevant in our celery-allergic population. IgE to Api g 7, detected in 52% of patients, correlated closely (</span><em>r</em> = 0.86) to Art v 1 from mugwort pollen. Eleven of 12 patients with monosensitization to Api g 7 were IgE negative to celery extract. The odds ratio for developing a severe anaphylactic reaction rather than only mild oral symptoms was about 6 times greater (odds ratio, 5.87; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-32.0; <em>P</em> = .0410) for Api g 7–sensitized versus –nonsensitized subjects.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There is an urgent need for routine diagnostic tests to assess sensitization to Api g 7, not only to increase test sensitivity but also to identify patients at risk of a severe allergic reaction to celery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14936,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091674924005025","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Celery root is known to cause severe allergic reactions in patients sensitized to mugwort pollen.

Objective

We studied clinically well-characterized patients with celery allergy by IgE testing with a comprehensive panel of celery allergens to disentangle the molecular basis of what is known as the celery–mugwort syndrome.

Methods

Patients with suspected food allergy to celery underwent a standardized interview. Main inclusion criteria were a positive food challenge with celery or an unambiguous case history of severe anaphylaxis. IgE to celery allergens (rApi g 1.01, rApi g 1.02, rApi g 2, rApi g 4, nApi g 5, rApi g 6, rApi g 7) and to mugwort allergens (rArt v 1, rArt v 3, rArt v 4) were determined. IgE levels ≥0.35 kUA/L were regarded positive.

Results

Seventy-nine patients with allergy to celery were included. Thirty patients had mild oral or rhinoconjunctival symptoms, and 49 had systemic reactions. Sixty-eight percent had IgE to celery extract, 80% to birch pollen, and 77% to mugwort pollen. A combination of Api g 1.01, 1.02, 4, 5, and 7 increased the diagnostic sensitivity for celery allergy to 92%. The lipid transfer proteins Api g 2 and Api g 6 were not relevant in our celery-allergic population. IgE to Api g 7, detected in 52% of patients, correlated closely (r = 0.86) to Art v 1 from mugwort pollen. Eleven of 12 patients with monosensitization to Api g 7 were IgE negative to celery extract. The odds ratio for developing a severe anaphylactic reaction rather than only mild oral symptoms was about 6 times greater (odds ratio, 5.87; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-32.0; P = .0410) for Api g 7–sensitized versus –nonsensitized subjects.

Conclusion

There is an urgent need for routine diagnostic tests to assess sensitization to Api g 7, not only to increase test sensitivity but also to identify patients at risk of a severe allergic reaction to celery.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
古老综合征的新发现:Api g 7 在艾草花粉相关芹菜过敏症中的作用
背景众所周知,芹菜根会导致对艾草花粉过敏的患者出现严重过敏反应。目的我们通过对芹菜过敏原进行全面的 IgE 检测,研究了临床上特征明确的芹菜过敏患者,以揭示所谓的芹菜艾草综合征的分子基础。主要纳入标准为芹菜食物挑战阳性或有明确的严重过敏性休克病史。测定芹菜过敏原(rApi g 1.01、rApi g 1.02、rApi g 2、rApi g 4、nApi g 5、rApi g 6、rApi g 7)和艾草过敏原(rArt v 1、rArt v 3、rArt v 4)的 IgE。IgE水平≥0.35 kUA/L为阳性。30 名患者有轻微的口腔或鼻结膜症状,49 名患者有全身反应。68%的患者对芹菜提取物产生 IgE,80%的患者对桦树花粉产生 IgE,77%的患者对艾草花粉产生 IgE。Api g 1.01、1.02、4、5 和 7 的组合可将芹菜过敏的诊断灵敏度提高到 92%。脂质转移蛋白 Api g 2 和 Api g 6 与我们的芹菜过敏人群无关。在 52% 的患者中检测到的 Api g 7 IgE 与艾草花粉中的 Art v 1 密切相关(r = 0.86)。在对 Api g 7 单敏的 12 名患者中,有 11 人对芹菜提取物的 IgE 呈阴性。Api g 7致敏受试者与非致敏受试者发生严重过敏反应而非仅出现轻微口腔症状的几率比较大,前者约为后者的 6 倍(几率比,5.87;95% 置信区间,1.08-32.0;P = .0410)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
1302
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology is a prestigious publication that features groundbreaking research in the fields of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology. This influential journal publishes high-impact research papers that explore various topics, including asthma, food allergy, allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, primary immune deficiencies, occupational and environmental allergy, and other allergic and immunologic diseases. The articles not only report on clinical trials and mechanistic studies but also provide insights into novel therapies, underlying mechanisms, and important discoveries that contribute to our understanding of these diseases. By sharing this valuable information, the journal aims to enhance the diagnosis and management of patients in the future.
期刊最新文献
Association of CD19+-Targeted Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell Therapy with Hypogammaglobulinemia, Infection and Mortality. Anti-IgE and Food Allergy. Baseline Epitope-Specific IgE Profiles are Predictive of Sustained Unresponsiveness or High Threshold One-Year Post OIT in the POISED Trial. Covid-19 mRNA vaccine allergy. Reply
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1