Temporal outline of geological heritage sites in the Western Caucasus

Dmitry A. Ruban , Anna V. Mikhailenko , Vladimir A. Ermolaev
{"title":"Temporal outline of geological heritage sites in the Western Caucasus","authors":"Dmitry A. Ruban ,&nbsp;Anna V. Mikhailenko ,&nbsp;Vladimir A. Ermolaev","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgeop.2024.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Geological heritage sites (geosites) have various properties such as accessibility, geometry, and vulnerability, as well as age. It is reasonable to distinguish the geological ages related to the content of geosites (e.g., Early Ordovician or Valanginian) from the technical ages related to the physical appearance (forms) of geosites (e.g., Late Pleistocene, Prehistoric, or 21st century). This study examines 17 geosites known from the Western Caucasus<em>—</em>a geologically-rich area of the Greater Caucasus orogen. The revision and the update of the stratigraphical information allow to establish their geological ages. The technical ages are defined as old (before the 19th century), historical (19th–20th centuries), or young (the beginning of the 21st century). The results show that the analyzed geosites shed light on the lengthy time span (from the late Proterozoic to the Quaternary), and the Cisuralian–Early Cretaceous sedimentary succession of the study area is represented with significant completeness. Technically, the geosites are chiefly old, although the historical and young features are also common. The outcomes of this study do not only systematize the knowledge of the ages of the geosites from the Western Caucasus, but also have several practical implications (for instance, the conservation of the technically young geosites is the priority, and the geological ages are important to arrange the geosites logically for educational and touristic excursions).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36117,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks","volume":"12 2","pages":"Pages 295-310"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2577444124000248/pdfft?md5=386aece76d10378395a214dab3072fca&pid=1-s2.0-S2577444124000248-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2577444124000248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Geological heritage sites (geosites) have various properties such as accessibility, geometry, and vulnerability, as well as age. It is reasonable to distinguish the geological ages related to the content of geosites (e.g., Early Ordovician or Valanginian) from the technical ages related to the physical appearance (forms) of geosites (e.g., Late Pleistocene, Prehistoric, or 21st century). This study examines 17 geosites known from the Western Caucasusa geologically-rich area of the Greater Caucasus orogen. The revision and the update of the stratigraphical information allow to establish their geological ages. The technical ages are defined as old (before the 19th century), historical (19th–20th centuries), or young (the beginning of the 21st century). The results show that the analyzed geosites shed light on the lengthy time span (from the late Proterozoic to the Quaternary), and the Cisuralian–Early Cretaceous sedimentary succession of the study area is represented with significant completeness. Technically, the geosites are chiefly old, although the historical and young features are also common. The outcomes of this study do not only systematize the knowledge of the ages of the geosites from the Western Caucasus, but also have several practical implications (for instance, the conservation of the technically young geosites is the priority, and the geological ages are important to arrange the geosites logically for educational and touristic excursions).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
西高加索地质遗产地的时间轮廓
地质遗产地(geosites)具有各种特性,如可存取性、几何形状、脆弱性以及年代。将与地质遗迹内容相关的地质年代(如早奥陶世或瓦朗京世)与与地质遗迹物理外观(形式)相关的技术年龄(如晚更新世、史前或 21 世纪)区分开来是合理的。本研究考察了西高加索--大高加索造山带地质丰富的地区--已知的 17 个地层。通过对地层信息的修订和更新,可以确定它们的地质年龄。技术年龄被定义为古老(19 世纪以前)、历史(19-20 世纪)或年轻(21 世纪初)。结果表明,所分析的地质年代揭示了漫长的时间跨度(从晚新生代到第四纪),研究区域的西苏拉-早白垩世沉积演替具有显著的完整性。从技术上讲,地质岩性以古老岩性为主,但历史岩性和年轻岩性也很常见。这项研究的成果不仅系统化了西高加索地区地质遗迹的年龄知识,而且还具有若干实际意义(例如,保护技术上年轻的地质遗迹是当务之急,地质年龄对于合理安排地质遗迹的教育和旅游游览非常重要)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks
International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
72 days
期刊最新文献
Assessment of educational potential in Arouca and Estrela UNESCO Global Geoparks (Portugal) for multi-level students and teachers Green tourist behavior analysis and its relationship with the choice of eco-tourism destination: An empirical study Urban amusement parks of Midnapore (West Bengal, India): Utility, accessibility and structural diversity The tourism attractiveness of the Moroccan archaeological site of Volubilis: An analysis of the determinants through analytic hierarchy process (AHP) Adapting Values-Beliefs-Norms (VBN) model and the Value-Identity-Personal norm (VIP) model into ecotourism intention: A case study of Cat Tien National Park, Vietnam
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1