Curating salutogenic spaces in post-pandemic hybrid work environments: A photo-elicitation qualitative study

IF 2.4 Q2 GEOGRAPHY Wellbeing Space and Society Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.wss.2024.100204
Stuart McClean , Harriet Shortt , Charlotte von Bülow , Gemma Pike
{"title":"Curating salutogenic spaces in post-pandemic hybrid work environments: A photo-elicitation qualitative study","authors":"Stuart McClean ,&nbsp;Harriet Shortt ,&nbsp;Charlotte von Bülow ,&nbsp;Gemma Pike","doi":"10.1016/j.wss.2024.100204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article investigates the lived experience of hybrid working and the impact this has on knowledge workers’ psychosocial health and wellbeing. Specifically, we focus on how the workplace can promote or hinder wellbeing and how hybrid working is experienced after the pandemic. We draw on salutogenic theory – which considers the factors that support and enhance health and wellbeing – in the context of workplaces, to help us understand individual's experiences of hybrid working spaces. This draws attention to new critical insights into the relationship between workspaces and wellbeing. This article is based on empirical, visual data gathered from a case study of university academic and professional services staff, who were asked to take photographs of their hybrid working practices. Our findings highlight the paradox that individual curation of workspaces represents both personalisation and depersonalisation as employees seek to anchor self-identity and a sense of belonging to the workspace. We offer three contributions in this paper. First, little is known of the experiences of those attending hybrid work environments following the pandemic; therefore, our research contributes to this by using salutogenic theory to emphasise the importance of individuals having control over how they shape their environments to promote personal wellbeing. Second, we demonstrate how the use of visual methods to explore hybrid working highlights <em>how</em> individuals mobilise resources within their workspaces to develop a self-responsibility for health. Third, we highlight the importance of how organisations should recognise individual circumstances when developing hybrid working policies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52616,"journal":{"name":"Wellbeing Space and Society","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100204"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666558124000228/pdfft?md5=0b983a6d8d6d7036095eaa0fe3811eff&pid=1-s2.0-S2666558124000228-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wellbeing Space and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666558124000228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article investigates the lived experience of hybrid working and the impact this has on knowledge workers’ psychosocial health and wellbeing. Specifically, we focus on how the workplace can promote or hinder wellbeing and how hybrid working is experienced after the pandemic. We draw on salutogenic theory – which considers the factors that support and enhance health and wellbeing – in the context of workplaces, to help us understand individual's experiences of hybrid working spaces. This draws attention to new critical insights into the relationship between workspaces and wellbeing. This article is based on empirical, visual data gathered from a case study of university academic and professional services staff, who were asked to take photographs of their hybrid working practices. Our findings highlight the paradox that individual curation of workspaces represents both personalisation and depersonalisation as employees seek to anchor self-identity and a sense of belonging to the workspace. We offer three contributions in this paper. First, little is known of the experiences of those attending hybrid work environments following the pandemic; therefore, our research contributes to this by using salutogenic theory to emphasise the importance of individuals having control over how they shape their environments to promote personal wellbeing. Second, we demonstrate how the use of visual methods to explore hybrid working highlights how individuals mobilise resources within their workspaces to develop a self-responsibility for health. Third, we highlight the importance of how organisations should recognise individual circumstances when developing hybrid working policies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在大流行后的混合工作环境中策划致富空间:一项照片征集定性研究
本文调查了混合工作的生活体验以及这种体验对知识工作者的社会心理健康和幸福感的影响。具体而言,我们关注工作场所如何促进或阻碍健康,以及大流行后混合工作的体验。我们借鉴了 "致敬理论"--该理论考虑了工作场所中支持和促进健康与幸福的因素--来帮助我们理解个人在混合工作空间中的体验。这使我们对工作空间与健康之间的关系有了新的重要认识。本文基于一项针对大学学术和专业服务人员的案例研究中收集到的经验性视觉数据,这些人员被要求拍摄其混合工作实践的照片。我们的研究结果凸显了一个悖论,即个人对工作空间的规划既代表了个性化,也代表了去个性化,因为员工在工作空间中寻求自我认同和归属感。本文有三点贡献。首先,人们对大流行病发生后在混合工作环境中工作的人的经历知之甚少;因此,我们的研究通过使用致敬理论来强调个人控制如何塑造环境以促进个人福祉的重要性,从而对此有所贡献。其次,我们展示了如何使用视觉方法来探索混合工作方式,从而突出个人如何在工作空间内调动资源来发展对健康的自我责任感。第三,我们强调了组织在制定混合工作政策时应如何认识到个人情况的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Wellbeing Space and Society
Wellbeing Space and Society Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
124 days
期刊最新文献
Neighborhood ‘double disadvantage’ and child development in inner city and growth areas “If I was in charge”: A qualitative investigation of water security, gender-based violence and wellbeing in Kenya Process and practice in New Zealand Enviroschool implementation The loss of rural vital places: A case study using the social determinants of health framework The contributions of community seed saving to health and wellbeing: A qualitative study in Thunder Bay, Canada
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1