Yue Chen , Zikun Mao , Jonathan A. Myers , Jinghua Yu , Xugao Wang
{"title":"Tree mycorrhizal associations determine how biodiversity, large trees, and environmental factors drive aboveground carbon stock in temperate forests","authors":"Yue Chen , Zikun Mao , Jonathan A. Myers , Jinghua Yu , Xugao Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.fecs.2024.100205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Biodiversity, large trees, and environmental conditions such as climate and soil have important effects on forest carbon stocks. However, recent studies in temperate forests suggest that the relative importance of these factors depends on tree mycorrhizal associations, whereby large-tree effects may be driven by ectomycorrhizal (EM) trees, diversity effects may be driven by arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) trees, and environment effects may depend on differential climate and soil preferences of AM and EM trees. To test this hypothesis, we used forest-inventory data consisting of over 80,000 trees from 631 temperate-forest plots (30 m × 30 m) across Northeast China to examine how biodiversity (species diversity and ecological uniqueness), large trees (top 1% of tree diameters), and environmental factors (climate and soil nutrients) differently regulate aboveground carbon stocks of AM trees, EM trees, and AM and EM trees combined (i.e. total aboveground carbon stock). We found that large trees had a positive effect on both AM and EM tree carbon stocks. However, biodiversity and environmental factors had opposite effects on AM vs. EM tree carbon stocks. Specifically, the two components of biodiversity had positive effects on AM tree carbon stocks, but negative effects on EM tree carbon stocks. Environmental heterogeneity (mean annual temperature and soil nutrients) also exhibited contrasting effects on AM and EM tree carbon stocks. Consequently, for the total carbon stock, the positive large-tree effect far surpasses the diversity and environment effect. This is mainly because when integrating AM and EM tree carbon stock into total carbon stock, the opposite diversity-effect (also environment-effect) on AM vs. EM tree carbon stock counteracts each other while the consistent positive large-tree effect on AM and EM tree carbon stock is amplified. In summary, this study emphasized a mycorrhizal viewpoint to better understand the determinants of overarching aboveground carbon profile across regional forests.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54270,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecosystems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2197562024000411/pdfft?md5=349f3edcad5d7d48f4496576cadd177c&pid=1-s2.0-S2197562024000411-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecosystems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2197562024000411","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Biodiversity, large trees, and environmental conditions such as climate and soil have important effects on forest carbon stocks. However, recent studies in temperate forests suggest that the relative importance of these factors depends on tree mycorrhizal associations, whereby large-tree effects may be driven by ectomycorrhizal (EM) trees, diversity effects may be driven by arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) trees, and environment effects may depend on differential climate and soil preferences of AM and EM trees. To test this hypothesis, we used forest-inventory data consisting of over 80,000 trees from 631 temperate-forest plots (30 m × 30 m) across Northeast China to examine how biodiversity (species diversity and ecological uniqueness), large trees (top 1% of tree diameters), and environmental factors (climate and soil nutrients) differently regulate aboveground carbon stocks of AM trees, EM trees, and AM and EM trees combined (i.e. total aboveground carbon stock). We found that large trees had a positive effect on both AM and EM tree carbon stocks. However, biodiversity and environmental factors had opposite effects on AM vs. EM tree carbon stocks. Specifically, the two components of biodiversity had positive effects on AM tree carbon stocks, but negative effects on EM tree carbon stocks. Environmental heterogeneity (mean annual temperature and soil nutrients) also exhibited contrasting effects on AM and EM tree carbon stocks. Consequently, for the total carbon stock, the positive large-tree effect far surpasses the diversity and environment effect. This is mainly because when integrating AM and EM tree carbon stock into total carbon stock, the opposite diversity-effect (also environment-effect) on AM vs. EM tree carbon stock counteracts each other while the consistent positive large-tree effect on AM and EM tree carbon stock is amplified. In summary, this study emphasized a mycorrhizal viewpoint to better understand the determinants of overarching aboveground carbon profile across regional forests.
Forest EcosystemsEnvironmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
4.90%
发文量
1115
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍:
Forest Ecosystems is an open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing scientific communications from any discipline that can provide interesting contributions about the structure and dynamics of "natural" and "domesticated" forest ecosystems, and their services to people. The journal welcomes innovative science as well as application oriented work that will enhance understanding of woody plant communities. Very specific studies are welcome if they are part of a thematic series that provides some holistic perspective that is of general interest.