Gender differences in patient experience among persons with spinal cord injury: A comparison across 22 countries

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Disability and Health Journal Pub Date : 2024-05-17 DOI:10.1016/j.dhjo.2024.101642
{"title":"Gender differences in patient experience among persons with spinal cord injury: A comparison across 22 countries","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.dhjo.2024.101642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Due to the majority of males within the population of persons with spinal cord injuries (SCI), a male-oriented perception of persons with SCI might affect care provision in the way of prioritizing male needs.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The objective of this cross-sectional study is to describe the patient experience of persons with SCI by gender.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study was based on the International Spinal Cord Injury Survey with 12,588 participants from 22 countries. An interval-based patient experience score was attained by partial credit model. Regression analysis was used in exploring the association between patient experience and gender.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Participants reported very good and good patient experience. Respectful treatment was reported by 78 % of participants; clear explanations by 75 %; involvement in decision-making by 71 %; satisfaction with services by 62 %. The average patient experience score was equal among males and females (average: 64, range: 0–100), with the highest score in participants from the USA (78) and the lowest – in Morocco (44). Patient experience score was not associated with gender. Females had lower odds of reporting better decision-making involvement, yet higher odds of better satisfaction. Older participants, with higher household income and better self-rated health, had lower odds of being satisfied.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The majority of persons with SCI rated their experience as good or very good. Females were more likely to report higher satisfaction with services and lower involvement in decision-making. For other patient experience categories and the overall patient experience score, no association with gender was found.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49300,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Health Journal","volume":"17 4","pages":"Article 101642"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936657424000736/pdfft?md5=7c6027859816a1e5ab887a9309e2341d&pid=1-s2.0-S1936657424000736-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936657424000736","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Due to the majority of males within the population of persons with spinal cord injuries (SCI), a male-oriented perception of persons with SCI might affect care provision in the way of prioritizing male needs.

Objective

The objective of this cross-sectional study is to describe the patient experience of persons with SCI by gender.

Methods

This study was based on the International Spinal Cord Injury Survey with 12,588 participants from 22 countries. An interval-based patient experience score was attained by partial credit model. Regression analysis was used in exploring the association between patient experience and gender.

Results

Participants reported very good and good patient experience. Respectful treatment was reported by 78 % of participants; clear explanations by 75 %; involvement in decision-making by 71 %; satisfaction with services by 62 %. The average patient experience score was equal among males and females (average: 64, range: 0–100), with the highest score in participants from the USA (78) and the lowest – in Morocco (44). Patient experience score was not associated with gender. Females had lower odds of reporting better decision-making involvement, yet higher odds of better satisfaction. Older participants, with higher household income and better self-rated health, had lower odds of being satisfied.

Conclusion

The majority of persons with SCI rated their experience as good or very good. Females were more likely to report higher satisfaction with services and lower involvement in decision-making. For other patient experience categories and the overall patient experience score, no association with gender was found.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脊髓损伤患者经历的性别差异:22 个国家的比较
背景由于脊髓损伤(SCI)患者中男性居多,以男性为导向的脊髓损伤患者观念可能会影响护理服务的提供,从而影响男性需求的优先次序。通过部分信用模型获得了基于区间的患者体验评分。结果参与者报告了非常好和好的患者体验。78%的参与者表示受到了尊重;75%的参与者表示得到了清晰的解释;71%的参与者表示参与了决策;62%的参与者表示对服务感到满意。男性和女性的患者体验平均得分相同(平均:64 分,范围:0-100 分),来自美国的参与者得分最高(78 分),摩洛哥的参与者得分最低(44 分)。患者体验得分与性别无关。女性参与决策的几率较低,但满意度较高。年龄较大、家庭收入较高和自评健康状况较好的参与者满意度较低。女性对服务的满意度较高,而对决策的参与度较低。在其他患者体验类别和患者体验总分方面,没有发现与性别相关的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Disability and Health Journal
Disability and Health Journal HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
134
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: Disability and Health Journal is a scientific, scholarly, and multidisciplinary journal for reporting original contributions that advance knowledge in disability and health. Topics may be related to global health, quality of life, and specific health conditions as they relate to disability. Such contributions include: • Reports of empirical research on the characteristics of persons with disabilities, environment, health outcomes, and determinants of health • Reports of empirical research on the Systematic or other evidence-based reviews and tightly conceived theoretical interpretations of research literature • Reports of empirical research on the Evaluative research on new interventions, technologies, and programs • Reports of empirical research on the Reports on issues or policies affecting the health and/or quality of life for persons with disabilities, using a scientific base.
期刊最新文献
Intellectual disabilities and risk of cardiovascular diseases: A population-based cohort study. Exhibiting lived experiences of disability in a hospital workplace: A qualitative evaluation. Disability and intimate partner violence experience among women in rural Samoa: A cross-sectional analysis. Exploring the physical, psychological, and social benefits of adaptive outdoor cycling in persons with stroke using a mixed methods approach. History and future directions of DHJO.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1