Scaled performance on the Vascular Qualifying Examination does not correlate with Vascular Certifying Examination first attempt pass in a national cohort of residents and fellows

M. Libby Weaver MD , Yoon Soo Park PhD , Andrew T. Jones PhD , Malachi G. Sheahan MD , Kellie R. Brown MD , Rabih A. Chaer MD , Thomas S. Huber MD, PhD , Brigitte K. Smith MD, MHPE
{"title":"Scaled performance on the Vascular Qualifying Examination does not correlate with Vascular Certifying Examination first attempt pass in a national cohort of residents and fellows","authors":"M. Libby Weaver MD ,&nbsp;Yoon Soo Park PhD ,&nbsp;Andrew T. Jones PhD ,&nbsp;Malachi G. Sheahan MD ,&nbsp;Kellie R. Brown MD ,&nbsp;Rabih A. Chaer MD ,&nbsp;Thomas S. Huber MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Brigitte K. Smith MD, MHPE","doi":"10.1016/j.jvsvi.2024.100088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Specialty board certification is an important indicator of surgeon competence and necessary for residency and fellowship programs to maintain accreditation by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Thus, identification of trainees at risk of board certification failure is important for both vascular surgery graduates and their parent program. We sought to examine the correlation of Vascular Qualifying Examination (VQE) performance on first-time pass achievement of the Vascular Certifying Examination (VCE).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used American Board of Surgery data to examine predictive associations of a national longitudinal cohort of all vascular surgery integrated residents (VIRs) and vascular surgery fellows (VSFs) who completed the VQE and VCE from 2016 through 2021. Descriptive statistics were used to examine trends. We used χ<sup>2</sup> tests to examine proportional group differences. Predictive associations between VQE scaled score performance and first-time pass achievement on subsequent VCE attempts were examined using logistic regression.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>VQE scaled score performance and VCE pass rates were obtained for all VIRs and VSFs (n = 579; 175 residents and 404 fellows) from 151 programs (48 residency and 103 fellowship) during the study period. First-attempt pass rate for the VQE was 96% in the study cohort, and first-attempt pass rate for the VCE was 94%. There were no significant differences in pass-fail rates in VQE and VCE for VIR and VSF candidates (<em>P</em> = .210 and <em>P</em> = .116, respectively). Trainee scaled score performance on the VQE was not predictive of subsequent first-attempt pass achievement on VCE (odds ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.01; <em>P</em> = .077). Stratified subgroup analyses by VIR and VSF cohorts also showed no significant predictive first-attempt VCE pass achievement (<em>P</em> = .190 and <em>P</em> = .094, respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In this national cohort of vascular trainees taking the VQE and VCE, VQE performance was not predictive of subsequent VCE first-time pass achievement. This finding highlights the necessity to identify other measures of trainee competence to indicate the preparedness of trainees for board certification examinations. Furthermore, this may be reflective of the ability to assess distinctive competencies between the two examinations, with the VQE focused on medical knowledge and the VCE on clinical judgment and interpersonal communication skills, thus broadening assessment of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education core competencies to ensure certification of vascular surgeons possessing both the knowledge and judgment necessary to maintain high-quality standards within our specialty.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74034,"journal":{"name":"JVS-vascular insights","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949912724000369/pdfft?md5=6318b6e07fc3acd8279a3e85838eb806&pid=1-s2.0-S2949912724000369-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JVS-vascular insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949912724000369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Specialty board certification is an important indicator of surgeon competence and necessary for residency and fellowship programs to maintain accreditation by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Thus, identification of trainees at risk of board certification failure is important for both vascular surgery graduates and their parent program. We sought to examine the correlation of Vascular Qualifying Examination (VQE) performance on first-time pass achievement of the Vascular Certifying Examination (VCE).

Methods

We used American Board of Surgery data to examine predictive associations of a national longitudinal cohort of all vascular surgery integrated residents (VIRs) and vascular surgery fellows (VSFs) who completed the VQE and VCE from 2016 through 2021. Descriptive statistics were used to examine trends. We used χ2 tests to examine proportional group differences. Predictive associations between VQE scaled score performance and first-time pass achievement on subsequent VCE attempts were examined using logistic regression.

Results

VQE scaled score performance and VCE pass rates were obtained for all VIRs and VSFs (n = 579; 175 residents and 404 fellows) from 151 programs (48 residency and 103 fellowship) during the study period. First-attempt pass rate for the VQE was 96% in the study cohort, and first-attempt pass rate for the VCE was 94%. There were no significant differences in pass-fail rates in VQE and VCE for VIR and VSF candidates (P = .210 and P = .116, respectively). Trainee scaled score performance on the VQE was not predictive of subsequent first-attempt pass achievement on VCE (odds ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.01; P = .077). Stratified subgroup analyses by VIR and VSF cohorts also showed no significant predictive first-attempt VCE pass achievement (P = .190 and P = .094, respectively).

Conclusions

In this national cohort of vascular trainees taking the VQE and VCE, VQE performance was not predictive of subsequent VCE first-time pass achievement. This finding highlights the necessity to identify other measures of trainee competence to indicate the preparedness of trainees for board certification examinations. Furthermore, this may be reflective of the ability to assess distinctive competencies between the two examinations, with the VQE focused on medical knowledge and the VCE on clinical judgment and interpersonal communication skills, thus broadening assessment of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education core competencies to ensure certification of vascular surgeons possessing both the knowledge and judgment necessary to maintain high-quality standards within our specialty.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在全国住院医师和研究员群体中,血管资格考试的评分成绩与血管认证考试的初试通过率不相关
背景专科委员会认证是衡量外科医生能力的一个重要指标,也是住院医师培训和研究员培训项目获得毕业后医学教育认证委员会认证的必要条件。因此,识别有可能无法通过委员会认证的受训人员对血管外科毕业生及其母校项目都很重要。我们试图研究血管资格考试(Vascular Qualifying Examination,VQE)成绩与血管认证考试(Vascular Certifying Examination,VCE)首次通过成绩之间的相关性。方法我们使用美国外科学委员会的数据研究了2016年至2021年期间完成VQE和VCE的所有血管外科综合住院医师(VIR)和血管外科研究员(VSF)的全国纵向队列的预测关联。我们使用描述性统计来研究趋势。我们使用χ2检验来考察比例组差异。研究期间,我们获得了来自 151 个项目(48 个住院医师项目和 103 个研究员项目)的所有 VIR 和 VSF(n = 579;175 名住院医师和 404 名研究员)的 VQE 比例分数成绩和 VCE 通过率。研究队列中,VQE 的初试通过率为 96%,VCE 的初试通过率为 94%。VIR 和 VSF 候选人在 VQE 和 VCE 的通过-失败率上没有明显差异(P = .210 和 P = .116)。受训者在 VQE 中的标度分成绩并不能预测其后在 VCE 中的首次尝试通过率(几率比为 1.00;95% 置信区间为 1.00-1.01;P = 0.077)。按 VIR 和 VSF 队列进行的分层亚组分析也显示,VQE 成绩对首次通过 VCE 考试没有显著的预测作用(分别为 P = .190 和 P = .094)。这一发现突出表明,有必要确定其他衡量受训者能力的指标,以显示受训者是否为委员会认证考试做好了准备。此外,这可能反映了两种考试之间评估不同能力的能力,VQE 侧重于医学知识,而 VCE 侧重于临床判断和人际沟通技能,从而扩大了对毕业医学教育认证委员会核心能力的评估范围,确保认证的血管外科医生同时具备必要的知识和判断力,以保持本专业的高质量标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Regarding “Intravascular Ultrasound Use in Peripheral Arterial and Deep Venous Interventions: Multidisciplinary Expert Opinion from SCAI/AVF/AVLS/SIR/SVM/SVS” An Assessment of Racial Diversity in Vascular Surgery Educational Resources The use of artificial intelligence in three-dimensional imaging modalities and diabetic foot disease – a systematic review Room for improvement in patient compliance during peripheral vascular interventions Reply
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1