The prognostic role of circulating tumor DNA across breast cancer molecular subtypes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Nana Guo , Qingxin Zhou , Meng Zhang , Xiaowei Chen , Baoqi Zeng , Shanshan Wu , Hongmei Zeng , Mopei Wang , Fei Ma , Feng Sun
{"title":"The prognostic role of circulating tumor DNA across breast cancer molecular subtypes: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Nana Guo ,&nbsp;Qingxin Zhou ,&nbsp;Meng Zhang ,&nbsp;Xiaowei Chen ,&nbsp;Baoqi Zeng ,&nbsp;Shanshan Wu ,&nbsp;Hongmei Zeng ,&nbsp;Mopei Wang ,&nbsp;Fei Ma ,&nbsp;Feng Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.jncc.2024.04.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is increasingly being used as a potential prognostic biomarker in cancer patients. We aimed to assess the prognostic value of ctDNA in different subtypes of breast cancer patients throughout the whole treatment cycle.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and clinical trials.gov databases were searched from January 2016 to May 2022. The following search terms were used: ctDNA OR circulating tumor DNA AND breast cancer OR breast carcinoma. Only studies written in English were included. The following pre-specified criteria should be met for inclusion: (i) original articles, conference abstracts, etc.; (ii) patients with breast cancer; (iii) ctDNA measurement; and (iv) clinical outcome data such as recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). The random-effects model was preferred considering the potential heterogeneity across studies. The main outcomes are ctDNA detection rate and postoperative long-term outcomes (RFS and OS).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 24 studies were screened. At every measurement time, the ctDNA detection rate of the HR+ subgroup was similar to that of the HR- subgroup (<em>P</em> = 0.075; <em>P</em> = 0.458; <em>P</em> = 0.744; and <em>P</em> = 0.578), and the ctDNA detection rate of the HER2+ subgroup was similar to that of the HER2- subgroup (<em>P</em> = 0.805; <em>P</em> = 0.271; <em>P</em> = 0.807; and <em>P</em> = 0.703). In the HR+ subgroup, RFS and OS of ctDNA positive patients were similar to those of ctDNA negative patients (<em>P</em> = 0.589 and <em>P</em> = 0.110), while RFS and OS of the ctDNA positive group was significantly shorter than those of the ctDNA negative patients in the HR- subgroup (HR = 4.03, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001; HR = 3.21, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). According to HER grouping, the results were the same as above. In the triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) subgroup, the RFS and OS of ctDNA-positive patients was significantly shorter than of the ctDNA negative patients before and after surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>ctDNA was more predictive of recurrence-free survival and overall survival in the HR- subgroup than in the HR+ subgroup, and the same result was showed in the HER2- subgroup <em>vs</em>. HER2+ subgroup. The prognosis of the TNBC subtype is closely related to ctDNA before and after surgery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73987,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Center","volume":"4 2","pages":"Pages 153-161"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667005424000267/pdfft?md5=fd31fa5ddae7c55667f1411404631dd6&pid=1-s2.0-S2667005424000267-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Cancer Center","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667005424000267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is increasingly being used as a potential prognostic biomarker in cancer patients. We aimed to assess the prognostic value of ctDNA in different subtypes of breast cancer patients throughout the whole treatment cycle.

Materials and methods

PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and clinical trials.gov databases were searched from January 2016 to May 2022. The following search terms were used: ctDNA OR circulating tumor DNA AND breast cancer OR breast carcinoma. Only studies written in English were included. The following pre-specified criteria should be met for inclusion: (i) original articles, conference abstracts, etc.; (ii) patients with breast cancer; (iii) ctDNA measurement; and (iv) clinical outcome data such as recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). The random-effects model was preferred considering the potential heterogeneity across studies. The main outcomes are ctDNA detection rate and postoperative long-term outcomes (RFS and OS).

Results

A total of 24 studies were screened. At every measurement time, the ctDNA detection rate of the HR+ subgroup was similar to that of the HR- subgroup (P = 0.075; P = 0.458; P = 0.744; and P = 0.578), and the ctDNA detection rate of the HER2+ subgroup was similar to that of the HER2- subgroup (P = 0.805; P = 0.271; P = 0.807; and P = 0.703). In the HR+ subgroup, RFS and OS of ctDNA positive patients were similar to those of ctDNA negative patients (P = 0.589 and P = 0.110), while RFS and OS of the ctDNA positive group was significantly shorter than those of the ctDNA negative patients in the HR- subgroup (HR = 4.03, P < 0.001; HR = 3.21, P < 0.001). According to HER grouping, the results were the same as above. In the triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) subgroup, the RFS and OS of ctDNA-positive patients was significantly shorter than of the ctDNA negative patients before and after surgery.

Conclusions

ctDNA was more predictive of recurrence-free survival and overall survival in the HR- subgroup than in the HR+ subgroup, and the same result was showed in the HER2- subgroup vs. HER2+ subgroup. The prognosis of the TNBC subtype is closely related to ctDNA before and after surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乳腺癌分子亚型中循环肿瘤 DNA 的预后作用:系统回顾和荟萃分析
目的循环肿瘤 DNA(ctDNA)越来越多地被用作癌症患者潜在的预后生物标志物。我们旨在评估ctDNA在不同亚型乳腺癌患者整个治疗周期中的预后价值。材料和方法检索了2016年1月至2022年5月期间的PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、Cochrane Library、Scopus和clinical trials.gov数据库。使用的检索词如下:ctDNA OR 循环肿瘤 DNA AND 乳腺癌 OR 乳腺癌。仅纳入以英语撰写的研究。纳入研究应符合以下预设标准:(i) 原创文章、会议摘要等;(ii) 乳腺癌患者;(iii) ctDNA 测量;(iv) 无复发生存期(RFS)和总生存期(OS)等临床结果数据。考虑到各研究之间可能存在异质性,因此首选随机效应模型。主要结果为ctDNA检出率和术后长期结果(RFS和OS)。在每个测量时间,HR+亚组的ctDNA检出率与HR-亚组相似(P = 0.075;P = 0.458;P = 0.744;P = 0.578),HER2+亚组的ctDNA检出率与HER2-亚组相似(P = 0.805;P = 0.271;P = 0.807;P = 0.703)。在HR+亚组中,ctDNA阳性患者的RFS和OS与ctDNA阴性患者相似(P = 0.589和P = 0.110),而在HR-亚组中,ctDNA阳性组的RFS和OS明显短于ctDNA阴性患者(HR = 4.03,P <0.001;HR = 3.21,P <0.001)。根据 HER 分组,结果与上述相同。在三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)亚组中,ctDNA阳性患者手术前后的RFS和OS明显短于ctDNA阴性患者。TNBC亚型的预后与手术前后的ctDNA密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
70 days
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Cancer survival statistics in China 2019–2021: a multicenter, population-based study Associations between blood glucose and early- and late-onset colorectal cancer: evidence from two prospective cohorts and Mendelian randomization analyses Primary liver cancer organoids and their application to research and therapy DCS, a novel classifier system based on disulfidptosis reveals tumor microenvironment heterogeneity and guides frontline therapy for clear cell renal carcinoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1