Validation of country-of-origin effects on crisis spillovers: A meta-analysis

IF 4.1 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS Public Relations Review Pub Date : 2024-05-15 DOI:10.1016/j.pubrev.2023.102419
Difan Guo , Jinghong Xu
{"title":"Validation of country-of-origin effects on crisis spillovers: A meta-analysis","authors":"Difan Guo ,&nbsp;Jinghong Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.pubrev.2023.102419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In today's globalized economy and highly interconnected media landscape, the impact of country-of-origin (COO) effects on crisis spillovers has attracted growing interest. However, the majority of the relevant studies are limited to case studies. A clear understanding of the relationship between COO effects and crisis spillovers has yet to be established. To address this gap, a meta-analysis of 24 causal pairs from 9 papers (n = 5746, combined n = 10942) was performed. The results indicate that COO effects can somewhat limit crisis spillovers. Specifically, the COO effect has a medium degree of mitigating effect on morality (r = 0.403) and competence crises (r = 0.240). When the COO is a developed country (r = 0.345), the COO effect can effectively mitigate crisis spillovers to a medium extent, while when the COO is a developing country (r = 0.180), the COO effect is small. Using organizational impressions (r = 0.357) rather than purchase intentions (r = 0.157) as a measurement instrument makes it easier to observe the dampening effect of COO on crisis spillovers. These findings enrich the theoretical framework of public relations and crisis management and provide strategies for business organizations to cope with spillovers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48263,"journal":{"name":"Public Relations Review","volume":"50 3","pages":"Article 102419"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Relations Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363811123001340","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In today's globalized economy and highly interconnected media landscape, the impact of country-of-origin (COO) effects on crisis spillovers has attracted growing interest. However, the majority of the relevant studies are limited to case studies. A clear understanding of the relationship between COO effects and crisis spillovers has yet to be established. To address this gap, a meta-analysis of 24 causal pairs from 9 papers (n = 5746, combined n = 10942) was performed. The results indicate that COO effects can somewhat limit crisis spillovers. Specifically, the COO effect has a medium degree of mitigating effect on morality (r = 0.403) and competence crises (r = 0.240). When the COO is a developed country (r = 0.345), the COO effect can effectively mitigate crisis spillovers to a medium extent, while when the COO is a developing country (r = 0.180), the COO effect is small. Using organizational impressions (r = 0.357) rather than purchase intentions (r = 0.157) as a measurement instrument makes it easier to observe the dampening effect of COO on crisis spillovers. These findings enrich the theoretical framework of public relations and crisis management and provide strategies for business organizations to cope with spillovers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
验证来源国对危机溢出效应的影响:荟萃分析
在经济全球化和媒体高度互联的今天,来源国效应(COO)对危机溢出效应的影响引起了越来越多的关注。然而,大多数相关研究仅限于案例研究。对原产国效应与危机溢出效应之间关系的清晰认识尚未建立。针对这一空白,我们对 9 篇论文(n = 5746,合并 n = 10942)中的 24 对因果关系进行了元分析。结果表明,COO效应在一定程度上限制了危机溢出效应。具体来说,首席运营官效应对道德危机(r = 0.403)和能力危机(r = 0.240)有中等程度的缓解作用。当 COO 为发达国家时(r = 0.345),COO 效应能在中等程度上有效缓解危机外溢,而当 COO 为发展中国家时(r = 0.180),COO 效应较小。使用组织印象(r = 0.357)而非购买意向(r = 0.157)作为测量工具,更容易观察到 COO 对危机溢出效应的抑制作用。这些发现丰富了公共关系和危机管理的理论框架,并为企业组织应对危机溢出效应提供了策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
19.00%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: The Public Relations Review is the oldest journal devoted to articles that examine public relations in depth, and commentaries by specialists in the field. Most of the articles are based on empirical research undertaken by professionals and academics in the field. In addition to research articles and commentaries, The Review publishes invited research in brief, and book reviews in the fields of public relations, mass communications, organizational communications, public opinion formations, social science research and evaluation, marketing, management and public policy formation.
期刊最新文献
Different shades of green deception. Greenwashing’s adverse effects on corporate image and credibility Measuring social movement engagement: A co-creational approach to public engagement and social capital Editorial Board Effects of AI versus human source attribution on trust and forgiveness in the identical corporate apology statement for a data breach scandal “Being a Burson Person is something special”: Burson-Marsteller’s influence in the Americanization of the public relations industry in Latin America (1980s – 2010s)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1