Different Tillage and Residue Management Practices Affect Soil Biological Activities and Microbial Culturable Diversity in Rice-Wheat Cropping System Under Reclaimed Sodic Soils

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.12911/22998993/183555
Priyanka Chandra, R. K. Fagodiya, Arvind Kumar Rai, P. Sheoran, Kailash Prajapat, Ajay Singh, Kamlesh Verma, Vijendra Kumar Verma, Rajender Kumar Yadav, A. K. Biswas
{"title":"Different Tillage and Residue Management Practices Affect Soil Biological Activities and Microbial Culturable Diversity in Rice-Wheat Cropping System Under Reclaimed Sodic Soils","authors":"Priyanka Chandra, R. K. Fagodiya, Arvind Kumar Rai, P. Sheoran, Kailash Prajapat, Ajay Singh, Kamlesh Verma, Vijendra Kumar Verma, Rajender Kumar Yadav, A. K. Biswas","doi":"10.12911/22998993/183555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Agricultural management practices alter soil characteristics and influence soil biological properties. Hence, a field trial was carried out to assess the 14-year long-term impact of tillage and residue management practices on soil biological activities and microbial population in a rice-wheat cropping system in two depths viz., 0–15 and 15–30 cm. Soil organic carbon levels differed significantly (p > 0.05) across various treatments. Microbial biomass car - bon, microbial quotient, and soil enzymatic activities were significantly greater (10–82%) in crop residue incorpo - ration/retention treatments. Zero tillage with residue retention (ZT+R) had the greatest bacterial, actinomycetes, and fungi population, followed by reduced tillage with residue incorporation (RT+R). The ZT+R treatment had the greatest value of K-strategist and r-strategist, and was equivalent to RT+R across both soil depths. When compared to conventional tillage (CT), zero tillage (ZT) increased wheat yield by 9%. However, compared to CT, rice and rice-wheat systems had lower grain yields, whereas crop residue increased wheat and rice-wheat system yields by 10% and 6%, respectively. The findings of this long-term study show that residue management and tillage practices can enhance soil biological attributes while also supporting microbial diversity.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":"4 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/183555","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agricultural management practices alter soil characteristics and influence soil biological properties. Hence, a field trial was carried out to assess the 14-year long-term impact of tillage and residue management practices on soil biological activities and microbial population in a rice-wheat cropping system in two depths viz., 0–15 and 15–30 cm. Soil organic carbon levels differed significantly (p > 0.05) across various treatments. Microbial biomass car - bon, microbial quotient, and soil enzymatic activities were significantly greater (10–82%) in crop residue incorpo - ration/retention treatments. Zero tillage with residue retention (ZT+R) had the greatest bacterial, actinomycetes, and fungi population, followed by reduced tillage with residue incorporation (RT+R). The ZT+R treatment had the greatest value of K-strategist and r-strategist, and was equivalent to RT+R across both soil depths. When compared to conventional tillage (CT), zero tillage (ZT) increased wheat yield by 9%. However, compared to CT, rice and rice-wheat systems had lower grain yields, whereas crop residue increased wheat and rice-wheat system yields by 10% and 6%, respectively. The findings of this long-term study show that residue management and tillage practices can enhance soil biological attributes while also supporting microbial diversity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同耕作和残留物管理方法对水稻-小麦种植系统中土壤生物活动和微生物可培养多样性的影响
农业管理方法会改变土壤特性并影响土壤生物特性。因此,我们进行了一项田间试验,以评估在 0-15 厘米和 15-30 厘米两个深度的水稻-小麦种植系统中,耕作和残留物管理方法对土壤生物活动和微生物数量的 14 年长期影响。不同处理的土壤有机碳水平差异显著(p > 0.05)。在农作物秸秆耕作/保留处理中,微生物生物量、微生物商数和土壤酶活性明显增加(10-82%)。零碎耕作加残留物保留(ZT+R)的细菌、放线菌和真菌数量最多,其次是减少耕作加残留物掺入(RT+R)。ZT+R 处理的 K-strategist 和 r-strategist 值最大,在两个土壤深度上与 RT+R 相当。与传统耕作(CT)相比,零耕作(ZT)使小麦增产 9%。然而,与传统耕作相比,水稻和稻麦系统的谷物产量较低,而作物残茬则使小麦和稻麦系统的产量分别提高了 10% 和 6%。这项长期研究的结果表明,秸秆管理和耕作方法可以提高土壤生物属性,同时还能支持微生物多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Diversity-Generating Skeletal Editing Transformations. Single-Electron-Transfer-Mediated Carbonylation Reactions. Strengthening Liquid Crystal Elastomer Muscles. Structural and Mechanistic Advances in the Chemistry of Methyl-Coenzyme M Reductase (MCR). Issue Publication Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1