An economic indicator of the orbital debris environment

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jsse.2024.04.014
{"title":"An economic indicator of the orbital debris environment","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jsse.2024.04.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The continued growth of orbital debris increases potential losses faced by commercial operators in Earth's orbits. Yet, there is no commonly accepted measure that describes the orbital debris environment from an <em>economic</em> perspective. This study begins to fill that gap by developing an Orbital Debris Economic Loss Index (ODELI) that measures and tracks the changes in the expected negative economic impact of orbital debris on satellite operators, both in aggregate and in specific orbits. Such information is valuable to the stakeholders, such as policymakers, commercial operators, and the public, in communicating valuable information about the economic state of the orbital debris environment.</div><div>We illustrate the calculation of the index utilizing the data from 2012 to 2022. The analysis is based on the publicly available data and the Meteoroid and Space Debris Terrestrial Environment Reference (MASTER) orbital debris environment model. Our analysis suggests that the aggregate expected economic damage to Earth's orbits is increasing at a slower rate than the growth rate of the number of satellites or trackable pieces of debris objects. The slower rate of growth in ODELI indices from 2012 to 2022 is explained by a decrease in the average mass of satellites, a reduction in the real cost of placing satellites in orbit, and a commercial preference to launch satellites into orbits with lower debris density.</div><div>The estimates of annual expected economic losses from debris collisions increased from $86 million to $107 million from 2012 to 2022, and the losses are concentrated in the low-Earth orbit (LEO). However, LEO had the smallest rate of increase in ODELI compared to other orbits. Medium-Earth orbit (MEO), which has the smallest contribution to the combined expected economic losses from debris on the Earth's orbits, experienced the fastest rate of increase in ODELI during the same period.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468896724000600","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The continued growth of orbital debris increases potential losses faced by commercial operators in Earth's orbits. Yet, there is no commonly accepted measure that describes the orbital debris environment from an economic perspective. This study begins to fill that gap by developing an Orbital Debris Economic Loss Index (ODELI) that measures and tracks the changes in the expected negative economic impact of orbital debris on satellite operators, both in aggregate and in specific orbits. Such information is valuable to the stakeholders, such as policymakers, commercial operators, and the public, in communicating valuable information about the economic state of the orbital debris environment.
We illustrate the calculation of the index utilizing the data from 2012 to 2022. The analysis is based on the publicly available data and the Meteoroid and Space Debris Terrestrial Environment Reference (MASTER) orbital debris environment model. Our analysis suggests that the aggregate expected economic damage to Earth's orbits is increasing at a slower rate than the growth rate of the number of satellites or trackable pieces of debris objects. The slower rate of growth in ODELI indices from 2012 to 2022 is explained by a decrease in the average mass of satellites, a reduction in the real cost of placing satellites in orbit, and a commercial preference to launch satellites into orbits with lower debris density.
The estimates of annual expected economic losses from debris collisions increased from $86 million to $107 million from 2012 to 2022, and the losses are concentrated in the low-Earth orbit (LEO). However, LEO had the smallest rate of increase in ODELI compared to other orbits. Medium-Earth orbit (MEO), which has the smallest contribution to the combined expected economic losses from debris on the Earth's orbits, experienced the fastest rate of increase in ODELI during the same period.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
轨道碎片环境的经济指标
轨道碎片的持续增长增加了地球轨道上商业运营商面临的潜在损失。然而,目前还没有公认的从经济角度描述轨道碎片环境的衡量标准。本研究通过开发轨道碎片经济损失指数(ODELI)开始填补这一空白,该指数可测量和跟踪轨道碎片对卫星运营商的预期负面经济影响的变化,包括总体影响和特定轨道影响。这些信息对于政策制定者、商业运营商和公众等利益相关者来说非常有价值,可以传递有关轨道碎片环境经济状况的宝贵信息。我们利用 2012 年至 2022 年的数据对指数的计算进行了说明。分析基于公开数据和流星体和空间碎片地面环境参考(MASTER)轨道碎片环境模型。我们的分析表明,对地球轨道的总体预期经济损失的增长速度低于卫星或可跟踪碎片物体数量的增长速度。2012 年至 2022 年,ODELI 指数的增长速度较慢,原因是卫星的平均质量下降,将卫星送入轨道的实际成本降低,以及商业上倾向于将卫星发射到碎片密度较低的轨道。不过,与其他轨道相比,低地轨道的 ODELI 增长率最小。中地轨道(MEO)在地球轨道碎片造成的综合预期经济损失中占比最小,但同期的ODELI增长速度最快。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Intentions to move abroad among medical students: a cross-sectional study to investigate determinants and opinions. The change process questionnaire (CPQ): A psychometric validation. Prevalence and predictors of hand hygiene compliance in clinical, surgical and intensive care unit wards: results of a second cross-sectional study at the Umberto I teaching hospital of Rome. The prevention of medication errors in the home care setting: a scoping review. Differential Costs of Raising Grandchildren on Older Mother-Adult Child Relations in Black and White Families.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1