WALKING WITH BLOOD FLOW RESTRICTION: A NOVEL METHOD TO IMPROVE PHYSICAL FITNESS IN OLDER ADULTS?

Mr Michael Beere, Dr Isaac Selva Raj, P. J. Peiffer, Professor Keith Hill, Dr Peter Edwards, Dr Belinda Brown, A. P. B. Scott
{"title":"WALKING WITH BLOOD FLOW RESTRICTION: A NOVEL METHOD TO IMPROVE PHYSICAL FITNESS IN OLDER ADULTS?","authors":"Mr Michael Beere, Dr Isaac Selva Raj, P. J. Peiffer, Professor Keith Hill, Dr Peter Edwards, Dr Belinda Brown, A. P. B. Scott","doi":"10.31189/2165-7629-13-s2.439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Alternative physical activity modalities and methods are needed to combat low adherence among older populations. Therefore, we are investigating whether blood flow restricted (BFR) walking improves measures of lower limb strength, and functional performance, compared to traditional walking in older adults.\n \n \n \n Healthy adults ≥60 years were randomised into BFR (n=5) or non-BFR (n=4) walking groups. Both groups walked outdoors, 3 days/week for 12 weeks starting at 4km/h and increasing walking speed by 0.5km/h every 4 weeks. The BFR group walked for 25min with BFR applied (60% arterial occlusion pressure) to the lower limbs in 2x 10mins bouts (separated by 5mins walking without occlusion). The non-BFR group walked for 50mins without occlusion, matching current best practice for low-moderate intensity physical activity. Participants were assessed at baseline and post-intervention (12 weeks) for knee extension maximal voluntary torque (MVTpeak) and functional capacity (four square step test [4SST], 5x sit-to-stand [STS], timed up and go [TUG], gait speed, and 6-minute walk test [6mWT]).\n \n \n \n There were no differences at baseline between groups (p>0.05). Both groups improved across all measures from baseline to post-intervention, with significant effects for time observed for: 4SST (7.92±1.2s – 6.83±1.39s; p=0.035), TUG (6.16±0.81s – 5.58±0.9s; p=0.04), STS (11.30±1.70s – 10.14±1.7s; p=0.032), but not for gait speed (3.98±0.69s – 3.71±0.69s; p=0.456), 6mWT (564.72±72.13m – 601.27±64.2m; p=0.129) and MVTpeak (112.33±25.8Nm – 120.55±23.5Nm; p=0.995). No group x time effect was observed from baseline to 12 weeks (p>0.05).\n \n \n \n The current results demonstrate significant improvements in functional measures (4SST, TUG, STS) from baseline to post-intervention, with no differences observed between groups. This indicates that low-intensity BFR walking may provide comparable physical fitness improvements to non-BFR walking while completing only 50% of the volume.\n","PeriodicalId":92070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical exercise physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical exercise physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31189/2165-7629-13-s2.439","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Alternative physical activity modalities and methods are needed to combat low adherence among older populations. Therefore, we are investigating whether blood flow restricted (BFR) walking improves measures of lower limb strength, and functional performance, compared to traditional walking in older adults. Healthy adults ≥60 years were randomised into BFR (n=5) or non-BFR (n=4) walking groups. Both groups walked outdoors, 3 days/week for 12 weeks starting at 4km/h and increasing walking speed by 0.5km/h every 4 weeks. The BFR group walked for 25min with BFR applied (60% arterial occlusion pressure) to the lower limbs in 2x 10mins bouts (separated by 5mins walking without occlusion). The non-BFR group walked for 50mins without occlusion, matching current best practice for low-moderate intensity physical activity. Participants were assessed at baseline and post-intervention (12 weeks) for knee extension maximal voluntary torque (MVTpeak) and functional capacity (four square step test [4SST], 5x sit-to-stand [STS], timed up and go [TUG], gait speed, and 6-minute walk test [6mWT]). There were no differences at baseline between groups (p>0.05). Both groups improved across all measures from baseline to post-intervention, with significant effects for time observed for: 4SST (7.92±1.2s – 6.83±1.39s; p=0.035), TUG (6.16±0.81s – 5.58±0.9s; p=0.04), STS (11.30±1.70s – 10.14±1.7s; p=0.032), but not for gait speed (3.98±0.69s – 3.71±0.69s; p=0.456), 6mWT (564.72±72.13m – 601.27±64.2m; p=0.129) and MVTpeak (112.33±25.8Nm – 120.55±23.5Nm; p=0.995). No group x time effect was observed from baseline to 12 weeks (p>0.05). The current results demonstrate significant improvements in functional measures (4SST, TUG, STS) from baseline to post-intervention, with no differences observed between groups. This indicates that low-intensity BFR walking may provide comparable physical fitness improvements to non-BFR walking while completing only 50% of the volume.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
限制血流的步行:提高老年人体能的新方法?
我们需要采用其他体育锻炼方式和方法来解决老年人坚持锻炼率低的问题。因此,我们正在研究与传统步行相比,血流受限(BFR)步行是否能改善老年人的下肢力量和功能表现。 年龄≥60 岁的健康成年人被随机分为血流受限步行组(5 人)和非血流受限步行组(4 人)。两组均在室外步行,每周 3 天,为期 12 周,从每小时 4 公里开始,每 4 周将步行速度提高 0.5 公里。BFR组在下肢施加BFR(60%动脉闭塞压力)的情况下步行25分钟,每10分钟为2次(间隔5分钟不闭塞步行)。非 BFR 组在不闭塞的情况下步行 50 分钟,符合当前低中等强度体育锻炼的最佳实践。参与者在基线和干预后(12 周)接受了膝关节伸展最大自主扭矩(MVTpeak)和功能能力(四平方步测试 [4SST]、5 倍坐立测试 [STS]、定时起立行走测试 [TUG]、步速和 6 分钟步行测试 [6mWT])的评估。 两组在基线上没有差异(P>0.05)。从基线到干预后,两组在所有测量指标上均有所改善,并在以下方面观察到显著的时间效应:4SST (7.92±1.2s - 6.83±1.39s;p=0.035)、TUG (6.16±0.81s - 5.58±0.9s;p=0.04)、STS (11.30±1.70s - 10.14±1.7s;p=0.032),但步态速度(3.98±0.69s-3.71±0.69s;p=0.456)、6mWT(564.72±72.13m-601.27±64.2m;p=0.129)和 MVTpeak(112.33±25.8Nm-120.55±23.5Nm;p=0.995)。从基线到 12 周,未观察到组别 x 时间效应(p>0.05)。 目前的结果表明,从基线到干预后,功能测量(4SST、TUG、STS)均有明显改善,组间无差异。这表明,低强度 BFR 步行可提供与非 BFR 步行相当的体能改善,同时只完成 50%的运动量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effects of 12 Months of Kettlebell Training on an Individual with Myasthenia Gravis Effective Manuscript Writing: A Learned Process Cardiorespiratory Effects of Tai Chi Versus Walking: Exploratory Data from the LEAP Trial Stroke, Step Count, and Alzheimer’s ECG Characteristics of Young High School Athletes in Northwest Florida
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1