The corporate digital responsibility (CDR) calculus: How and why organizations reconcile digital and ethical trade-offs for growth

IF 3.1 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS Organizational Dynamics Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2024.101056
Nicole Hartley , Werner Kunz , James Tarbit
{"title":"The corporate digital responsibility (CDR) calculus: How and why organizations reconcile digital and ethical trade-offs for growth","authors":"Nicole Hartley ,&nbsp;Werner Kunz ,&nbsp;James Tarbit","doi":"10.1016/j.orgdyn.2024.101056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this digital age, organizations are increasingly reliant on technology to drive business growth and innovation. With this reliance, comes an impetus for firms to responsibly and ethically manage their digital assets and data. In response, Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR) has been espoused as a means by which firms can address the competing demands of digital innovation and transformation and ethical responsibility. Ultimately, good CDR practices have the potential to safeguard not only firms, but the various stakeholders they interact with across their digital ecosystems. However, it is recognized that the resource investment required to do so, can come at a significant cost. The CDR Calculus has been developed to assist organizations in evaluating the risks and benefits associated with digital and data practices and to determine whether they align with the organization’s CDR objectives. This paper provides a roadmap of how firms can take steps to establish a culture of CDR practice in light of these tensions. We also recognize that external regulation is required, if not needed, to enforce and cement positive CDR practices as firms respond to growing digital demands.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48061,"journal":{"name":"Organizational Dynamics","volume":"53 2","pages":"Article 101056"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090261624000299/pdfft?md5=184f9cf73761d5861f6b3cb0f06ea8b0&pid=1-s2.0-S0090261624000299-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organizational Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090261624000299","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this digital age, organizations are increasingly reliant on technology to drive business growth and innovation. With this reliance, comes an impetus for firms to responsibly and ethically manage their digital assets and data. In response, Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR) has been espoused as a means by which firms can address the competing demands of digital innovation and transformation and ethical responsibility. Ultimately, good CDR practices have the potential to safeguard not only firms, but the various stakeholders they interact with across their digital ecosystems. However, it is recognized that the resource investment required to do so, can come at a significant cost. The CDR Calculus has been developed to assist organizations in evaluating the risks and benefits associated with digital and data practices and to determine whether they align with the organization’s CDR objectives. This paper provides a roadmap of how firms can take steps to establish a culture of CDR practice in light of these tensions. We also recognize that external regulation is required, if not needed, to enforce and cement positive CDR practices as firms respond to growing digital demands.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
企业数字责任 (CDR) 计算:企业如何以及为何协调数字与道德之间的权衡,以实现增长
在这个数字时代,企业越来越依赖技术来推动业务增长和创新。伴随着这种依赖,企业需要以负责任和合乎道德的方式管理其数字资产和数据。为此,企业数字责任(CDR)被推崇为企业应对数字创新和转型与道德责任之间竞争需求的一种手段。归根结底,良好的 CDR 实践不仅有可能保护企业,还能保护企业在数字生态系统中与之互动的各利益相关方。不过,我们也认识到,为此所需的资源投入可能会付出巨大代价。CDR 计算法的开发旨在帮助企业评估与数字和数据实践相关的风险和收益,并确定它们是否符合企业的 CDR 目标。本文提供了一个路线图,说明企业如何采取措施,根据这些矛盾建立 CDR 实践文化。我们还认识到,在企业应对日益增长的数字化需求时,外部监管即使不是必需的,也是必要的,以执行和巩固积极的 CDR 实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Organizational Dynamics domain is primarily organizational behavior and development and secondarily, HRM and strategic management. The objective is to link leading-edge thought and research with management practice. Organizational Dynamics publishes articles that embody both theoretical and practical content, showing how research findings can help deal more effectively with the dynamics of organizational life.
期刊最新文献
Trio of human, old and new copilots: Collaborative accountability of human, manuals/standards, and artificial intelligence (AI) Positive mindset: PsyCap’s roles in PERMA+4 and positive organizational psychology, behavior, and scholarship 2.0 Design thinking: Executing your organization's commitment to customer centricity Editorial Board Often wrong, never in doubt: Mitigating leadership overconfidence in decision-making
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1