Cluster methods in function better selection

M. Mijanović
{"title":"Cluster methods in function better selection","authors":"M. Mijanović","doi":"10.15406/mojsm.2024.07.00161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cluster analysis methods, also known as taxonomic methods, are intended for grouping objects and subjects according to certain characteristics, attributes and properties. Cluster analysis looks at relevant objects and attributes, classifying them into two or more independent groups. Cluster analysis supplemented with discriminant analysis is used in confirmatory and fundamental research. In numerous statistical-methodological procedures, these methods are applied when setting up and testing various hypotheses. Grouping methods are particularly useful in the process of different selections with the aim of forming coherent groups, which may or may not necessarily be statistically different. There are several models of clustering (grouping), always with one goal, which is greater proximity (similarity) of an entity belonging to a group compared to an entity belonging to another group. Two basic grouping models are recognizable, Hierarchical and Non-Hierarchical. Both models have the same goal, which is the formation of several independent homogeneous groups from one common group of entities. The hierarchical approach does not define the number of clusters in advance (a priori), in contrast to the Non-Hierarchical Model which defines in advance number of clusters. The grouping model is chosen depending on the specific problem and the set goal of grouping. In the process, several different models are often applied, and then one is chosen as in this research. It is important to point out that the theoretical number of clusters (groups) is often not realistically applicable in practice. Using the example of this research, it was proven that the first grouping was not a good solution. Through the subsequent, second and third iteration, as well as the application of additional discriminative methods, three optimal clusters were determined in the population of girls and boys. Satisfactory optimal grouping was obtained on the basis of gender criteria and achieved results on psycho-motor tests.","PeriodicalId":93216,"journal":{"name":"MOJ sports medicine","volume":"53 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MOJ sports medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/mojsm.2024.07.00161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cluster analysis methods, also known as taxonomic methods, are intended for grouping objects and subjects according to certain characteristics, attributes and properties. Cluster analysis looks at relevant objects and attributes, classifying them into two or more independent groups. Cluster analysis supplemented with discriminant analysis is used in confirmatory and fundamental research. In numerous statistical-methodological procedures, these methods are applied when setting up and testing various hypotheses. Grouping methods are particularly useful in the process of different selections with the aim of forming coherent groups, which may or may not necessarily be statistically different. There are several models of clustering (grouping), always with one goal, which is greater proximity (similarity) of an entity belonging to a group compared to an entity belonging to another group. Two basic grouping models are recognizable, Hierarchical and Non-Hierarchical. Both models have the same goal, which is the formation of several independent homogeneous groups from one common group of entities. The hierarchical approach does not define the number of clusters in advance (a priori), in contrast to the Non-Hierarchical Model which defines in advance number of clusters. The grouping model is chosen depending on the specific problem and the set goal of grouping. In the process, several different models are often applied, and then one is chosen as in this research. It is important to point out that the theoretical number of clusters (groups) is often not realistically applicable in practice. Using the example of this research, it was proven that the first grouping was not a good solution. Through the subsequent, second and third iteration, as well as the application of additional discriminative methods, three optimal clusters were determined in the population of girls and boys. Satisfactory optimal grouping was obtained on the basis of gender criteria and achieved results on psycho-motor tests.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
更好地选择功能的聚类方法
聚类分析方法又称分类学方法,旨在根据某些特征、属性和性质对对象和主体进行分组。聚类分析研究相关对象和属性,将其分为两个或多个独立的组。聚类分析辅以判别分析,可用于确证研究和基础研究。在许多统计方法程序中,这些方法都用于建立和检验各种假设。聚类方法在不同的选择过程中特别有用,其目的是形成一致的群体,这些群体在统计上可能有差异,也可能没有差异。有几种聚类(分组)模型,它们都有一个目标,即与属于另一个组的实体相比,属于一个组的实体更加接近(相似)。有两种基本的聚类模式:分层模式和非分层模式。这两种模式的目标都是一样的,即从一个共同的实体组中形成几个独立的同质组。分层方法并不预先(先验地)确定分组的数量,而非分层模式则预先确定分组的数量。分组模型的选择取决于具体问题和分组的既定目标。在这一过程中,通常会应用几种不同的模型,然后像本研究一样选择其中一种。需要指出的是,理论上的聚类(组)数量在实践中往往并不适用。以本研究为例,事实证明第一个分组并不是一个好的解决方案。通过随后的第二次和第三次迭代,以及应用其他判别方法,在男女生群体中确定了三个最佳聚类。在性别标准和心理运动测试结果的基础上,获得了令人满意的最佳分组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Psychogenic non-epileptic seizure-an entity on the borderzones of neurology, psychiatry and clinical psychology: a case report with review of literature Education in movement to counteract sedentariness in preschoolers How old is too old to fight in boxing? Cardiological emergency and acute myocardial infarction: physician and physiotherapist perceptions of immediate care, use of prehospital ECGS and patient referrals Cluster methods in function better selection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1