Effect of genetic and sex effect on genomic prediction for horn development in Nellore cattle

IF 1.8 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Livestock Science Pub Date : 2024-05-03 DOI:10.1016/j.livsci.2024.105478
Larissa Bordin Temp , Ludmilla Costa Brunes , Letícia Silva Pereira , Sabrina Thaise Amorim , Cláudio Ulhôa Magnabosco , Raysildo Barbosa Lobo , Ovidio Carlos de Brito , Ricardo Viacava , Fernando Baldi
{"title":"Effect of genetic and sex effect on genomic prediction for horn development in Nellore cattle","authors":"Larissa Bordin Temp ,&nbsp;Ludmilla Costa Brunes ,&nbsp;Letícia Silva Pereira ,&nbsp;Sabrina Thaise Amorim ,&nbsp;Cláudio Ulhôa Magnabosco ,&nbsp;Raysildo Barbosa Lobo ,&nbsp;Ovidio Carlos de Brito ,&nbsp;Ricardo Viacava ,&nbsp;Fernando Baldi","doi":"10.1016/j.livsci.2024.105478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study aimed to evaluate the influence of phenotypic classification of horn development, animal sex effect, and non-autosomal SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) markers on the genetic parameters and genomic prediction ability for horn development in Nellore cattle using the single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction method. The polled phenotype was evaluated in two (presence and absence of horns), three (scurs and polled offspring from a horned parent, and the polled and horned animals), and four (absence of horn, polled born to a parent with horn, scurs, and presence of horn) phenotypic categories. A total of 12 statistical models were evaluated. The variance components were estimated using the THRGIBBS1F90 software, and a threshold animal model was used for genomic prediction analyses with the single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) procedure. Accuracy, bias, and dispersion parameters were evaluated based on the linear regression (LR) method. The highest heritability (0.84) was obtained when the polled character was evaluated as a binary trait. The lowest heritability estimates (0.44 to 0.45) for horn development were obtained when the phenotype was classified into three categories. For the same horn development classification method, the heritability estimates were similar regardless of the genomic evaluated models and fixed effects included in the model. For models considering four and three phenotypic categories for horn development, the inclusion of the sex effect as a fixed effect within the CG did not improve the accuracy, bias, and dispersion of genomic predictions for horn development. Analyzing the trait with binary expression, the highest prediction accuracy was observed when the effect of sex was not included in the CG and without the SNPs in the sex chromosomes. These models displayed the highest dispersion, pointing out the low robustness of genomic prediction. In addition, models that use less than four categories to classify the horn development phenotype, with no discrimination between polled and homozygous polled displayed lower prediction ability. The inclusion of non-autosomal SNPs in the analyses for the models considering four phenotypic categories leads to an improvement in prediction accuracy in 5,26 %, bias, and dispersion reduction, 37 % and 4,55 %, respectively, compared with models that only considered autosomal SNPs. The selection using genomic information for the polled trait is feasible, and it is an alternative to obtaining polled Nellore animals. The binary coding of horn development is an unsuitable oversimplification of polled phenotype, and probably, the genetic background of horn development is more complex than previously proposed. The most adequate prediction model to evaluate the horn development in Nellore cattle was considering four phenotypic categories and including non-autosomal SNP in the analyses for genomic prediction purposes of naturally genetically polled animals. Genetic dehorning can be adopted on a large scale as a low-cost and non-invasive approach to increase the frequency of hornless animals using genomic information and mating strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18152,"journal":{"name":"Livestock Science","volume":"284 ","pages":"Article 105478"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Livestock Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871141324000854","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the influence of phenotypic classification of horn development, animal sex effect, and non-autosomal SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) markers on the genetic parameters and genomic prediction ability for horn development in Nellore cattle using the single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction method. The polled phenotype was evaluated in two (presence and absence of horns), three (scurs and polled offspring from a horned parent, and the polled and horned animals), and four (absence of horn, polled born to a parent with horn, scurs, and presence of horn) phenotypic categories. A total of 12 statistical models were evaluated. The variance components were estimated using the THRGIBBS1F90 software, and a threshold animal model was used for genomic prediction analyses with the single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) procedure. Accuracy, bias, and dispersion parameters were evaluated based on the linear regression (LR) method. The highest heritability (0.84) was obtained when the polled character was evaluated as a binary trait. The lowest heritability estimates (0.44 to 0.45) for horn development were obtained when the phenotype was classified into three categories. For the same horn development classification method, the heritability estimates were similar regardless of the genomic evaluated models and fixed effects included in the model. For models considering four and three phenotypic categories for horn development, the inclusion of the sex effect as a fixed effect within the CG did not improve the accuracy, bias, and dispersion of genomic predictions for horn development. Analyzing the trait with binary expression, the highest prediction accuracy was observed when the effect of sex was not included in the CG and without the SNPs in the sex chromosomes. These models displayed the highest dispersion, pointing out the low robustness of genomic prediction. In addition, models that use less than four categories to classify the horn development phenotype, with no discrimination between polled and homozygous polled displayed lower prediction ability. The inclusion of non-autosomal SNPs in the analyses for the models considering four phenotypic categories leads to an improvement in prediction accuracy in 5,26 %, bias, and dispersion reduction, 37 % and 4,55 %, respectively, compared with models that only considered autosomal SNPs. The selection using genomic information for the polled trait is feasible, and it is an alternative to obtaining polled Nellore animals. The binary coding of horn development is an unsuitable oversimplification of polled phenotype, and probably, the genetic background of horn development is more complex than previously proposed. The most adequate prediction model to evaluate the horn development in Nellore cattle was considering four phenotypic categories and including non-autosomal SNP in the analyses for genomic prediction purposes of naturally genetically polled animals. Genetic dehorning can be adopted on a large scale as a low-cost and non-invasive approach to increase the frequency of hornless animals using genomic information and mating strategies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
遗传和性别效应对内洛尔牛角发育基因组预测的影响
本研究旨在利用单步基因组最佳线性无偏预测法,评估牛角发育的表型分类、动物性别效应和非常染色体 SNP(单核苷酸多态性)标记对内洛尔牛角发育的遗传参数和基因组预测能力的影响。对花粉表型进行了两类(有角和无角)、三类(有角亲本的后代有鳞和花粉,以及花粉和有角动物)和四类(无角、有角亲本所生的花粉、有鳞和有角)表型评估。共评估了 12 个统计模型。使用 THRGIBBS1F90 软件估算了方差分量,并使用单步基因组 BLUP(ssGBLUP)程序对阈值动物模型进行了基因组预测分析。根据线性回归(LR)方法评估了准确性、偏差和分散参数。当将花粉特征作为二元性状进行评估时,遗传率最高(0.84)。将表型分为三类时,牛角发育的遗传率估计值最低(0.44 至 0.45)。对于相同的角发育分类方法,无论基因组评估模型和模型中包含的固定效应如何,遗传力估计值都是相似的。对于角发育表型分为四类和三类的模型,将性别效应作为固定效应包含在基因组中并不能提高角发育基因组预测的准确性、偏差和分散性。在分析二元表达的性状时,如果在基因组中不包含性别效应,也不包含性染色体上的 SNPs,则预测准确率最高。这些模型的离散度最高,表明基因组预测的稳健性较低。此外,使用少于四个类别对牛角发育表型进行分类、不区分花粉和同卵花粉的模型预测能力较低。与只考虑常染色体 SNP 的模型相比,将非常染色体 SNP 纳入考虑四个表型类别的模型的分析中,预测准确率提高了 5.26%,偏差和离散度分别降低了 37% 和 4.55%。利用基因组信息对花粉性状进行选择是可行的,也是获得花粉内洛尔动物的一种替代方法。牛角发育的二元编码是对花粉表型的过度简化,可能牛角发育的遗传背景比之前提出的更为复杂。评估内洛尔牛角发育的最适当预测模型是考虑四个表型类别,并将非常染色体 SNP 纳入分析,以实现对天然遗传花粉牛的基因组预测。遗传去角法可作为一种低成本、非侵入性的方法大规模采用,利用基因组信息和交配策略提高无角动物的频率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Livestock Science
Livestock Science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
237
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Livestock Science promotes the sound development of the livestock sector by publishing original, peer-reviewed research and review articles covering all aspects of this broad field. The journal welcomes submissions on the avant-garde areas of animal genetics, breeding, growth, reproduction, nutrition, physiology, and behaviour in addition to genetic resources, welfare, ethics, health, management and production systems. The high-quality content of this journal reflects the truly international nature of this broad area of research.
期刊最新文献
What is the impact of neutral detergent fibre digestibility on productive performance of beef cattle fed tropical forages? Characterization and mitigation measures for carbon dioxide, methane, and ammonia emissions in dairy barns Genetic markers associated with beef quality: A review Whole genome resequencing analysis elucidate genetic features and signature of selection in binhu buffaloes Enhancing growth performance and health of coloured-broiler chickens with signal grass meal (Brachiaria decumbens) supplementation under tropical conditions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1