{"title":"Does user activity promote gambling-related content on Twitter/X?","authors":"Marcos Lerma, Rory A. Pfund, James P. Whelan","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2024.108297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Social media has provided gambling operators with access to millions of individuals and novel ways to promote gambling. Research has suggested that exposure to gambling advertisements on social media platforms is associated with increased gambling in individuals at-risk for problem gambling. These findings bring into question whether social media platforms are sensitive to differences in user account activity (e.g., tweets, likes, accounts visited) when displaying promoted advertisements and gambling-related content. To assess for these differences, four Twitter/X accounts were created and assigned to send out tweets containing pro-gambling or safe-gambling messages. Additionally, each account was assigned to interact with Twitter/X profiles associated with gambling operators or responsible gambling. Accounts were assessed daily for promoted advertisement traffic and gambling-related content from January to March 2022. The study included three phases that implemented changes in privacy settings, websites visited, and gambling-related tweets observed. To assess for between-phase differences, Tau-<em>U</em> analyses were performed using R. Gambling-related content observed was dependent on assigned account activity. Accounts that interacted with gambling operators’ profiles were only displayed pro-gambling content. Conversely, accounts that interacted with responsible gambling profiles were only displayed safe-gambling content. No promoted gambling advertisements were observed throughout the study. Findings suggest that Twitter/X is sensitive to differences in account activity, and user activity may influence gambling content displayed on Twitter/X. Nevertheless, gambling operators should adopt a conservative approach on social media to ensure protection of consumers. Consumers should be given autonomy to engage with gambling content without being drawn in involuntarily.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563224001651","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Social media has provided gambling operators with access to millions of individuals and novel ways to promote gambling. Research has suggested that exposure to gambling advertisements on social media platforms is associated with increased gambling in individuals at-risk for problem gambling. These findings bring into question whether social media platforms are sensitive to differences in user account activity (e.g., tweets, likes, accounts visited) when displaying promoted advertisements and gambling-related content. To assess for these differences, four Twitter/X accounts were created and assigned to send out tweets containing pro-gambling or safe-gambling messages. Additionally, each account was assigned to interact with Twitter/X profiles associated with gambling operators or responsible gambling. Accounts were assessed daily for promoted advertisement traffic and gambling-related content from January to March 2022. The study included three phases that implemented changes in privacy settings, websites visited, and gambling-related tweets observed. To assess for between-phase differences, Tau-U analyses were performed using R. Gambling-related content observed was dependent on assigned account activity. Accounts that interacted with gambling operators’ profiles were only displayed pro-gambling content. Conversely, accounts that interacted with responsible gambling profiles were only displayed safe-gambling content. No promoted gambling advertisements were observed throughout the study. Findings suggest that Twitter/X is sensitive to differences in account activity, and user activity may influence gambling content displayed on Twitter/X. Nevertheless, gambling operators should adopt a conservative approach on social media to ensure protection of consumers. Consumers should be given autonomy to engage with gambling content without being drawn in involuntarily.
期刊介绍:
Computers in Human Behavior is a scholarly journal that explores the psychological aspects of computer use. It covers original theoretical works, research reports, literature reviews, and software and book reviews. The journal examines both the use of computers in psychology, psychiatry, and related fields, and the psychological impact of computer use on individuals, groups, and society. Articles discuss topics such as professional practice, training, research, human development, learning, cognition, personality, and social interactions. It focuses on human interactions with computers, considering the computer as a medium through which human behaviors are shaped and expressed. Professionals interested in the psychological aspects of computer use will find this journal valuable, even with limited knowledge of computers.