Review of carbon sequestration by alkaline industrial wastes: potential applications in landfill biogeochemical cover systems

IF 2.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management Pub Date : 2024-05-18 DOI:10.1007/s10163-024-01975-x
Gaurav Verma, Krishna R. Reddy
{"title":"Review of carbon sequestration by alkaline industrial wastes: potential applications in landfill biogeochemical cover systems","authors":"Gaurav Verma,&nbsp;Krishna R. Reddy","doi":"10.1007/s10163-024-01975-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The surge in global industrialization has significantly increased greenhouse gas concentrations in the Earth's atmosphere, with carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) being the predominant contributor to about two-thirds of the greenhouse effect. Landfill gas (LFG), resulting from the biodegradation of municipal solid waste (MSW), mainly consists of methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) and CO<sub>2</sub>. To counteract uncontrolled CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from waste decomposition, an innovative, low-cost biogeochemical cover (BGCC) system for landfills utilizing biochar-amended soil and basic oxygen furnace (BOF) slag for CO<sub>2</sub> carbonation has been developed. Despite the effectiveness of BOF slag in CO<sub>2</sub> removal, its limited availability near landfill sites presents sustainability challenges, necessitating the search for viable alternatives within the BGCC system that can achieve efficient CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration through direct aqueous mineral carbonation. This review explores various carbon sequestration techniques, identifying potential alkaline industrial solid wastes as substitutes for BOF slag, and evaluates these materials—namely cement kiln dust (CKD), blast furnace (BF) slag, coal fly ash (CFA), and concrete waste—for their compatibility with the BGCC system. CKD is highlighted as having the highest carbonation potential based on its capacity for direct aqueous carbonation, with a comparative analysis revealing substantial differences in the carbonation capacities of the materials. Given the fine-grained nature of the selected materials, the review also emphasizes the need to integrate them into barrier soil layers or use them as standalone layers within the BGCC. In conclusion, this review accentuates the potential of alternative materials in achieving effective CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration within BGCC, thereby addressing the challenges related to the availability of BOF slag and promoting sustainable landfill management practices.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":643,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10163-024-01975-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The surge in global industrialization has significantly increased greenhouse gas concentrations in the Earth's atmosphere, with carbon dioxide (CO2) being the predominant contributor to about two-thirds of the greenhouse effect. Landfill gas (LFG), resulting from the biodegradation of municipal solid waste (MSW), mainly consists of methane (CH4) and CO2. To counteract uncontrolled CO2 emissions from waste decomposition, an innovative, low-cost biogeochemical cover (BGCC) system for landfills utilizing biochar-amended soil and basic oxygen furnace (BOF) slag for CO2 carbonation has been developed. Despite the effectiveness of BOF slag in CO2 removal, its limited availability near landfill sites presents sustainability challenges, necessitating the search for viable alternatives within the BGCC system that can achieve efficient CO2 sequestration through direct aqueous mineral carbonation. This review explores various carbon sequestration techniques, identifying potential alkaline industrial solid wastes as substitutes for BOF slag, and evaluates these materials—namely cement kiln dust (CKD), blast furnace (BF) slag, coal fly ash (CFA), and concrete waste—for their compatibility with the BGCC system. CKD is highlighted as having the highest carbonation potential based on its capacity for direct aqueous carbonation, with a comparative analysis revealing substantial differences in the carbonation capacities of the materials. Given the fine-grained nature of the selected materials, the review also emphasizes the need to integrate them into barrier soil layers or use them as standalone layers within the BGCC. In conclusion, this review accentuates the potential of alternative materials in achieving effective CO2 sequestration within BGCC, thereby addressing the challenges related to the availability of BOF slag and promoting sustainable landfill management practices.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
碱性工业废物固碳研究综述:在垃圾填埋场生物地球化学覆盖系统中的潜在应用
全球工业化的迅猛发展大大增加了地球大气中的温室气体浓度,其中二氧化碳(CO2)占温室效应的三分之二。城市固体废物(MSW)生物降解产生的垃圾填埋气(LFG)主要由甲烷(CH4)和二氧化碳组成。为了抵消垃圾分解过程中不受控制的二氧化碳排放,人们开发了一种创新的低成本生物地球化学覆盖(BGCC)系统,利用生物炭改良土壤和碱性氧气炉(BOF)炉渣进行二氧化碳碳化,用于垃圾填埋场。尽管碱性氧气炉炉渣能有效去除二氧化碳,但其在垃圾填埋场附近的有限可用性带来了可持续发展的挑战,因此有必要在 BGCC 系统中寻找可行的替代品,通过直接水性矿物碳化实现高效的二氧化碳封存。本综述探讨了各种碳封存技术,确定了潜在的碱性工业固体废弃物,以替代高炉矿渣,并评估了这些材料(即水泥窑粉尘 (CKD)、高炉矿渣 (BF)、粉煤灰 (CFA) 和混凝土废弃物)与 BGCC 系统的兼容性。根据其直接水碳化能力,CKD 的碳化潜力最高,对比分析表明这些材料的碳化能力存在很大差异。鉴于所选材料的细粒度特性,本综述还强调需要将它们整合到隔离土层中,或将它们用作 BGCC 中的独立土层。总之,本综述强调了替代材料在实现 BGCC 内二氧化碳有效封存方面的潜力,从而解决了与转炉炉渣可用性相关的挑战,并促进了可持续填埋管理实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
16.10%
发文量
205
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management has a twofold focus: research in technical, political, and environmental problems of material cycles and waste management; and information that contributes to the development of an interdisciplinary science of material cycles and waste management. Its aim is to develop solutions and prescriptions for material cycles. The journal publishes original articles, reviews, and invited papers from a wide range of disciplines related to material cycles and waste management. The journal is published in cooperation with the Japan Society of Material Cycles and Waste Management (JSMCWM) and the Korea Society of Waste Management (KSWM).
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of circular economy practices for management of the reverse chain of electronic waste in Brazil Reaching China’s fertilizer reduction goals through nitrogen and phosphorus recovery: a substance flow analysis case study Students’ perceptions and inclination towards solid waste segregation for circular economy in Krobo municipalities of Ghana: awareness, willingness and potential determinants Study on the mechanisms of retardation of cement hydration by zinc and acceleration of hardening by sodium aluminate from crystallographic phase analysis Poultry litter ash potential as a replacement material in cementitious systems: a state-of-the-art review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1