{"title":"Review of carbon sequestration by alkaline industrial wastes: potential applications in landfill biogeochemical cover systems","authors":"Gaurav Verma, Krishna R. Reddy","doi":"10.1007/s10163-024-01975-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The surge in global industrialization has significantly increased greenhouse gas concentrations in the Earth's atmosphere, with carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) being the predominant contributor to about two-thirds of the greenhouse effect. Landfill gas (LFG), resulting from the biodegradation of municipal solid waste (MSW), mainly consists of methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) and CO<sub>2</sub>. To counteract uncontrolled CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from waste decomposition, an innovative, low-cost biogeochemical cover (BGCC) system for landfills utilizing biochar-amended soil and basic oxygen furnace (BOF) slag for CO<sub>2</sub> carbonation has been developed. Despite the effectiveness of BOF slag in CO<sub>2</sub> removal, its limited availability near landfill sites presents sustainability challenges, necessitating the search for viable alternatives within the BGCC system that can achieve efficient CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration through direct aqueous mineral carbonation. This review explores various carbon sequestration techniques, identifying potential alkaline industrial solid wastes as substitutes for BOF slag, and evaluates these materials—namely cement kiln dust (CKD), blast furnace (BF) slag, coal fly ash (CFA), and concrete waste—for their compatibility with the BGCC system. CKD is highlighted as having the highest carbonation potential based on its capacity for direct aqueous carbonation, with a comparative analysis revealing substantial differences in the carbonation capacities of the materials. Given the fine-grained nature of the selected materials, the review also emphasizes the need to integrate them into barrier soil layers or use them as standalone layers within the BGCC. In conclusion, this review accentuates the potential of alternative materials in achieving effective CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration within BGCC, thereby addressing the challenges related to the availability of BOF slag and promoting sustainable landfill management practices.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":643,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10163-024-01975-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The surge in global industrialization has significantly increased greenhouse gas concentrations in the Earth's atmosphere, with carbon dioxide (CO2) being the predominant contributor to about two-thirds of the greenhouse effect. Landfill gas (LFG), resulting from the biodegradation of municipal solid waste (MSW), mainly consists of methane (CH4) and CO2. To counteract uncontrolled CO2 emissions from waste decomposition, an innovative, low-cost biogeochemical cover (BGCC) system for landfills utilizing biochar-amended soil and basic oxygen furnace (BOF) slag for CO2 carbonation has been developed. Despite the effectiveness of BOF slag in CO2 removal, its limited availability near landfill sites presents sustainability challenges, necessitating the search for viable alternatives within the BGCC system that can achieve efficient CO2 sequestration through direct aqueous mineral carbonation. This review explores various carbon sequestration techniques, identifying potential alkaline industrial solid wastes as substitutes for BOF slag, and evaluates these materials—namely cement kiln dust (CKD), blast furnace (BF) slag, coal fly ash (CFA), and concrete waste—for their compatibility with the BGCC system. CKD is highlighted as having the highest carbonation potential based on its capacity for direct aqueous carbonation, with a comparative analysis revealing substantial differences in the carbonation capacities of the materials. Given the fine-grained nature of the selected materials, the review also emphasizes the need to integrate them into barrier soil layers or use them as standalone layers within the BGCC. In conclusion, this review accentuates the potential of alternative materials in achieving effective CO2 sequestration within BGCC, thereby addressing the challenges related to the availability of BOF slag and promoting sustainable landfill management practices.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management has a twofold focus: research in technical, political, and environmental problems of material cycles and waste management; and information that contributes to the development of an interdisciplinary science of material cycles and waste management. Its aim is to develop solutions and prescriptions for material cycles.
The journal publishes original articles, reviews, and invited papers from a wide range of disciplines related to material cycles and waste management.
The journal is published in cooperation with the Japan Society of Material Cycles and Waste Management (JSMCWM) and the Korea Society of Waste Management (KSWM).