Recreational Cannabis and Recriminalization in the “Emerald Triangle”

IF 2.2 4区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Sociological Inquiry Pub Date : 2024-05-14 DOI:10.1111/soin.12609
Philip R. Kavanaugh
{"title":"Recreational Cannabis and Recriminalization in the “Emerald Triangle”","authors":"Philip R. Kavanaugh","doi":"10.1111/soin.12609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cannabis had been illicitly cultivated for over half a century in the isolated tri‐county region of far northern California known in drugs lore as the “Emerald Triangle.” The regional industry gained legitimacy and experienced a significant boom in the 1990s when California legalized medical cannabis. In 2016, California legalized cannabis possession, use, and cultivation generally, and recreational sales for adults aged 21+ began in 2018. Drawing from 95 archived news reports published between 2018 and 2022 on California's move to legalize recreational cannabis as experienced in Humboldt County – the most populous in the region – I highlight how recreational legalization has invited opportunities for “soft” criminalization, while further legitimating the spectacle of police intervention into the illicit cannabis market. Soft criminalization has occurred via an onerous labyrinth of permitting laws that place untenable financial pressure on legacy cannabis growers. Entrenched forms of criminalization remain dependent on the trope of dangerous drug gangs, violence, and supposed ecological devastation.","PeriodicalId":47699,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Inquiry","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociological Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/soin.12609","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cannabis had been illicitly cultivated for over half a century in the isolated tri‐county region of far northern California known in drugs lore as the “Emerald Triangle.” The regional industry gained legitimacy and experienced a significant boom in the 1990s when California legalized medical cannabis. In 2016, California legalized cannabis possession, use, and cultivation generally, and recreational sales for adults aged 21+ began in 2018. Drawing from 95 archived news reports published between 2018 and 2022 on California's move to legalize recreational cannabis as experienced in Humboldt County – the most populous in the region – I highlight how recreational legalization has invited opportunities for “soft” criminalization, while further legitimating the spectacle of police intervention into the illicit cannabis market. Soft criminalization has occurred via an onerous labyrinth of permitting laws that place untenable financial pressure on legacy cannabis growers. Entrenched forms of criminalization remain dependent on the trope of dangerous drug gangs, violence, and supposed ecological devastation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
翡翠三角 "的大麻休闲和重新定罪
半个多世纪以来,在加利福尼亚州最北部与世隔绝的三郡地区,大麻一直被非法种植,该地区在毒品传说中被称为 "翡翠三角"。20 世纪 90 年代,加州将医用大麻合法化后,该地区的大麻产业获得了合法地位,并经历了显著的繁荣。2016 年,加利福尼亚州将大麻的持有、使用和种植普遍合法化,并于 2018 年开始对 21 岁以上的成年人进行娱乐性销售。我从 2018 年至 2022 年间发布的 95 篇存档新闻报道中汲取了洪堡县--该地区人口最多的县--所经历的加州娱乐用大麻合法化的举措,强调了娱乐用大麻合法化如何为 "软性 "定罪提供了机会,同时使警方干预非法大麻市场的场面进一步合法化。软性定罪是通过繁琐的许可法实现的,这些法律给传统的大麻种植者带来了难以承受的经济压力。根深蒂固的定罪形式仍然依赖于危险的贩毒团伙、暴力和所谓的生态破坏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Sociological Inquiry (SI) is committed to the exploration of the human condition in all of its social and cultural complexity. Its papers challenge us to look anew at traditional areas or identify novel areas for investigation. SI publishes both theoretical and empirical work as well as varied research methods in the study of social and cultural life.
期刊最新文献
Anticipatory Race‐Related Stress and Depressive Symptoms Among U.S. Black Women Attending a Historically Black University: Are Psychosocial Resources Stress Buffers? Working Time, Income Inequality, and Life Expectancy: A Longitudinal Analysis of US States, 2005–2018 “We May Look Like Cream‐of‐the‐Crop Kids, but it's Tough Here”: Elite Identity, Emotional Burden, and Ethical Transgressions Among Students at an Elite High School “Don't Touch!”: The Role of Cultural Knowledge in Low‐SES Parents' Perceptions of Museums Does Social Trust Travel? Comparing Resident and Non‐resident Citizens from a High‐Trusting Country
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1