Use of autologous platelet-rich plasma for skin graft preservation: an experimental comparative study.

IF 1.4 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE International Journal of Burns and Trauma Pub Date : 2024-04-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.62347/MLIW4300
Sarka Odlozilova, Jiri Paral, Igor Slaninka, Jan Zajak, Michal Lesko, Tomas Geryk, Lucie Gerykova, Miroslav Sirovy
{"title":"Use of autologous platelet-rich plasma for skin graft preservation: an experimental comparative study.","authors":"Sarka Odlozilova, Jiri Paral, Igor Slaninka, Jan Zajak, Michal Lesko, Tomas Geryk, Lucie Gerykova, Miroslav Sirovy","doi":"10.62347/MLIW4300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this experimental study, we aimed to determine whether platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a suitable preservative for dermo-epidermal grafts. An additional objective was to investigate how long grafts can be stored without biological degradation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared pig skin graft preservation using PRP versus saline solution and crystalloid Custodiol<sup>®</sup>, which is used for hypothermic preservation of organs for transplantation. Grafts (10 × 10 mm) were placed on gauze impregnated with one of the tested solutions, and stored for 3, 7, 11, and 15 days at a constant temperature of 4°C. We evaluated a total of 240 pig skin samples: 120 by histopathology and 120 by fluorescence optical microscopy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, Custodiol<sup>®</sup> solution appeared to be the best medium for preservation of dermo-epidermal grafts, with beneficial properties manifested on days 7 and 11. Although we expected PRP to be a better preservative than saline, this was not confirmed by our results, as we found no significant difference between these two media. In fact, by day 3, the histopathological results were better with standard saline solution than with PRP. On day 15, with each tested solution, some samples showed histological changes that are incompatible with graft viability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, Custodiol<sup>®</sup> appears to be the best medium for dermo-epidermal graft preservation. Moreover, the present findings suggest a maximum graft storage time of 11 days in all of the tested solutions. We do not recommend using grafts stored for 15 days, due to isolated signs of graft biodegradation with all solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":45488,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Burns and Trauma","volume":"14 2","pages":"38-47"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11101996/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Burns and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/MLIW4300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In this experimental study, we aimed to determine whether platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a suitable preservative for dermo-epidermal grafts. An additional objective was to investigate how long grafts can be stored without biological degradation.

Methods: We compared pig skin graft preservation using PRP versus saline solution and crystalloid Custodiol®, which is used for hypothermic preservation of organs for transplantation. Grafts (10 × 10 mm) were placed on gauze impregnated with one of the tested solutions, and stored for 3, 7, 11, and 15 days at a constant temperature of 4°C. We evaluated a total of 240 pig skin samples: 120 by histopathology and 120 by fluorescence optical microscopy.

Results: Overall, Custodiol® solution appeared to be the best medium for preservation of dermo-epidermal grafts, with beneficial properties manifested on days 7 and 11. Although we expected PRP to be a better preservative than saline, this was not confirmed by our results, as we found no significant difference between these two media. In fact, by day 3, the histopathological results were better with standard saline solution than with PRP. On day 15, with each tested solution, some samples showed histological changes that are incompatible with graft viability.

Conclusion: Overall, Custodiol® appears to be the best medium for dermo-epidermal graft preservation. Moreover, the present findings suggest a maximum graft storage time of 11 days in all of the tested solutions. We do not recommend using grafts stored for 15 days, due to isolated signs of graft biodegradation with all solutions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用自体富血小板血浆进行皮肤移植保存:一项实验性比较研究。
研究目的在这项实验研究中,我们旨在确定富血小板血浆(PRP)是否是真皮表皮移植的合适防腐剂。另一个目的是研究移植物可以保存多长时间而不会发生生物降解:我们比较了使用 PRP 和生理盐水以及用于移植器官低温保存的晶体 Custodiol® 对猪皮肤移植物的保存效果。将移植物(10 × 10 毫米)放在浸渍了其中一种测试溶液的纱布上,在 4°C 恒温条件下分别保存 3、7、11 和 15 天。我们总共评估了 240 份猪皮肤样本:其中 120 份采用组织病理学方法,120 份采用荧光光学显微镜方法:总的来说,Custodiol® 溶液似乎是保存真皮表皮移植的最佳介质,其有益特性在第 7 天和第 11 天表现出来。虽然我们预计 PRP 比生理盐水具有更好的防腐效果,但结果并没有证实这一点,因为我们发现这两种介质之间没有显著差异。事实上,在第 3 天,使用标准生理盐水的组织病理学结果比使用 PRP 更好。第 15 天,在每种测试溶液中,一些样本都出现了与移植物存活率不符的组织病理学变化:总的来说,Custodiol® 似乎是保存真皮表皮移植的最佳介质。此外,目前的研究结果表明,在所有测试溶液中,移植物的最长保存时间为 11 天。我们不建议使用保存 15 天的移植物,因为在所有溶液中都会出现移植物生物降解的个别迹象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
12.50%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Concurrent avulsion of posterior cruciate ligament and semimembranosus: a case-based discussion and literature review. Autologous non-vascularized fibula with compression plating in the management of aseptic complex non-union of long bones. Combined awake videolaryngo-bronchoscopy intubation with HFNC preoxygenation for predicted difficult airway in a patient with post-burn mentosternal scar contracture. Comparative outcome of ultrasound guided vs. fluoroscopy guided hydrodilatation in adhesive capsulitis: a prospective study. Evaluation of pain associated with the application of burn dressings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1