Regulating mobile health research in Canada: Public trust and public participation

M.H. Zawati , M. Lang
{"title":"Regulating mobile health research in Canada: Public trust and public participation","authors":"M.H. Zawati ,&nbsp;M. Lang","doi":"10.1016/j.jemep.2024.100988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Smartphone applications provide unique opportunities for health research. Prospective participants may be recruited, give consent, and may share personal health information with researchers with unparalleled efficiency. Mobile health apps thus have the potential to profoundly alter the way health research is conducted, thereby contributing to more effective and more equitably distributed clinical interventions. But the regulation of this kind of research is uncertain. The absence of regulatory guidance may limit mobile health's promise.</p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>The mobile health research landscape in Canada is considered in the context of the existing regulatory framework, academic literature, and current applications.</p></div><div><h3>Results/discussion</h3><p>This paper outlines regulatory issues in the Canadian context, suggesting three key issues to which researchers and regulators ought to be attentive to ensure public trust: consent, return of results, and privacy and security.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion/perspectives</h3><p>Further consideration of regulatory and ethical issues is needed if mobile health will earn the public's trust and promote public participation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37707,"journal":{"name":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","volume":"32 ","pages":"Article 100988"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352552524000239/pdfft?md5=a8ebdab94b3b99a92c8e45fb58888d85&pid=1-s2.0-S2352552524000239-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352552524000239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Smartphone applications provide unique opportunities for health research. Prospective participants may be recruited, give consent, and may share personal health information with researchers with unparalleled efficiency. Mobile health apps thus have the potential to profoundly alter the way health research is conducted, thereby contributing to more effective and more equitably distributed clinical interventions. But the regulation of this kind of research is uncertain. The absence of regulatory guidance may limit mobile health's promise.

Methodology

The mobile health research landscape in Canada is considered in the context of the existing regulatory framework, academic literature, and current applications.

Results/discussion

This paper outlines regulatory issues in the Canadian context, suggesting three key issues to which researchers and regulators ought to be attentive to ensure public trust: consent, return of results, and privacy and security.

Conclusion/perspectives

Further consideration of regulatory and ethical issues is needed if mobile health will earn the public's trust and promote public participation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
规范加拿大的移动健康研究:公众信任和公众参与
背景智能手机应用程序为健康研究提供了独特的机会。研究人员可以以无与伦比的效率招募潜在参与者,征得他们的同意,并与他们分享个人健康信息。因此,手机健康应用程序有可能深刻改变健康研究的方式,从而有助于更有效、更公平地分配临床干预措施。但对这类研究的监管还不确定。结果/讨论本文概述了加拿大的监管问题,提出了研究人员和监管人员为确保公众信任而应关注的三个关键问题:同意、结果返还以及隐私和安全。结论/展望如果移动医疗要赢得公众信任并促进公众参与,就需要进一步考虑监管和伦理问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ethics, Medicine and Public Health
Ethics, Medicine and Public Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
107
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: This review aims to compare approaches to medical ethics and bioethics in two forms, Anglo-Saxon (Ethics, Medicine and Public Health) and French (Ethique, Médecine et Politiques Publiques). Thus, in their native languages, the authors will present research on the legitimacy of the practice and appreciation of the consequences of acts towards patients as compared to the limits acceptable by the community, as illustrated by the democratic debate.
期刊最新文献
No reward without responsibility: Focus on peer review reports The human body and the body elements—Conditions for their use in genetics under the French bioethics law and beyond A retrospective cohort study on lung cancer screening methods in Japan and the US The Kussmaul sign in Michelangelo Buonarroti (1475–1564) Ethical reflections on healthy aging
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1