Shared mobility - Novel insights on mode substitution patterns, trip and user characteristics

Gustav Bösehans , Margaret Carol Bell , Dilum Dissanayake
{"title":"Shared mobility - Novel insights on mode substitution patterns, trip and user characteristics","authors":"Gustav Bösehans ,&nbsp;Margaret Carol Bell ,&nbsp;Dilum Dissanayake","doi":"10.1016/j.jcmr.2024.100029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With a growing number of shared mobility options, choosing not to own a car may become a new norm in the future. Shared mobility offers users a flexible range of low or zero-emission alternatives, potentially reducing the use of private cars, as well as noise and air pollution. However, to date, there is little evidence of shared mobility acting as an alternative to private car use. Indeed, recent research suggests that shared vehicles not only substitute trips by private car, but also trips by active travel and public transport, thus not resulting in emission savings. Therefore, as part of the eHUBS project focusing on shared electric mobility hubs, the mode substitution patterns of 602 self-reported shared mobility users across Europe were investigated. More specifically, respondents of an online survey were asked to recall their last trip using shared mobility and to report on both their chosen and substituted travel mode in addition to common trip characteristics including trip distance and frequency. Chosen shared modes considered were both conventional or electric alternatives including cars, bicycles, cargobikes, and scooters. Overall, the results suggested that shared vehicles were about as or more likely to substitute public transport, cycling and walking, as private car trips, thus providing a mixed picture with respect to their potential contribution to reducing private car use and associated carbon emissions. Local authorities and policy makers are urged to actively continue to improve active travel facilities and to be proactive in better integration of shared mobility and public transport services.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100771,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cycling and Micromobility Research","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 100029"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950105924000202/pdfft?md5=3a07afc6aab3c09d0640e668ee6948e3&pid=1-s2.0-S2950105924000202-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cycling and Micromobility Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950105924000202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With a growing number of shared mobility options, choosing not to own a car may become a new norm in the future. Shared mobility offers users a flexible range of low or zero-emission alternatives, potentially reducing the use of private cars, as well as noise and air pollution. However, to date, there is little evidence of shared mobility acting as an alternative to private car use. Indeed, recent research suggests that shared vehicles not only substitute trips by private car, but also trips by active travel and public transport, thus not resulting in emission savings. Therefore, as part of the eHUBS project focusing on shared electric mobility hubs, the mode substitution patterns of 602 self-reported shared mobility users across Europe were investigated. More specifically, respondents of an online survey were asked to recall their last trip using shared mobility and to report on both their chosen and substituted travel mode in addition to common trip characteristics including trip distance and frequency. Chosen shared modes considered were both conventional or electric alternatives including cars, bicycles, cargobikes, and scooters. Overall, the results suggested that shared vehicles were about as or more likely to substitute public transport, cycling and walking, as private car trips, thus providing a mixed picture with respect to their potential contribution to reducing private car use and associated carbon emissions. Local authorities and policy makers are urged to actively continue to improve active travel facilities and to be proactive in better integration of shared mobility and public transport services.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共享交通--关于交通方式替代模式、出行和用户特征的新见解
随着共享出行方式的日益增多,选择不拥有汽车可能成为未来的新常态。共享交通为用户提供了一系列灵活的低排放或零排放替代方案,有可能减少私家车的使用,并减少噪音和空气污染。然而,迄今为止,几乎没有证据表明共享交通可以替代私家车的使用。事实上,最近的研究表明,共享汽车不仅能替代私家车出行,还能替代主动出行和公共交通出行,因此并不能减少排放。因此,作为以共享电动交通枢纽为重点的 eHUBS 项目的一部分,我们对欧洲 602 名自我报告的共享交通用户的出行方式替代模式进行了调查。更具体地说,在线调查的受访者被要求回忆其最后一次使用共享交通出行的情况,并报告其选择和替代的出行方式,以及包括出行距离和频率在内的常见出行特征。受访者选择的共享出行方式既有传统的,也有电动的,包括汽车、自行车、轻便摩托车和滑板车。总体而言,研究结果表明,共享汽车替代公共交通、自行车和步行的可能性与替代私家车出行的可能性相当或更大,因此,共享汽车对减少私家车使用和相关碳排放的潜在贡献喜忧参半。我们敦促地方当局和政策制定者继续积极改善积极出行设施,并主动更好地整合共享出行和公共交通服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Designing an E-Bike City: An automated process for network-wide multimodal road space reallocation Scooting into place: How comfort on different infrastructure types influences shared e-scooter trip making A deep reinforcement learning solution to help reduce the cost in waiting time of securing a traffic light for cyclists Bike users’ route choice behaviour: Expectations from electric bikes versus reality in Greater Helsinki Overtaking on rural roads – Cyclists' and motorists' perspectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1