Evaluation of commercial 18650 and 26700 sodium-ion cells and comparison with well-established lithium-ion cells

IF 5.4 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL Journal of Power Sources Advances Pub Date : 2024-05-17 DOI:10.1016/j.powera.2024.100148
Katharina Bischof , Vittorio Marangon , Michael Kasper , Aislim Aracil Regalado , Margret Wohlfahrt-Mehrens , Markus Hölzle , Dominic Bresser , Thomas Waldmann
{"title":"Evaluation of commercial 18650 and 26700 sodium-ion cells and comparison with well-established lithium-ion cells","authors":"Katharina Bischof ,&nbsp;Vittorio Marangon ,&nbsp;Michael Kasper ,&nbsp;Aislim Aracil Regalado ,&nbsp;Margret Wohlfahrt-Mehrens ,&nbsp;Markus Hölzle ,&nbsp;Dominic Bresser ,&nbsp;Thomas Waldmann","doi":"10.1016/j.powera.2024.100148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Recently, the first sodium-ion cells have been commercialized and have become available for consumers. Given, moreover, the exciting announcements by several producers of such battery cells, it is of great interest to analyze these first commercial cells in order to understand which materials are used and how these cells are designed. Herein, two types of commercially available sodium-ion battery cells (cylindrical 1.5 Ah 18650 and 3.5 Ah 26700 cells) are investigated regarding (i) their electrode chemistry, (ii) their thermal properties upon discharge as a function of the applied C rate, (iii) the available specific energy, and (iv) their cell impedance. The data are correlated with the electrode thickness and electrode area obtained from an <em>ex situ</em> (ante-mortem) analysis of the 18650 cells, and discussed in comparison with the performance metrics reported for commercial lithium-ion cells. This comparison reveals that the herein studied 18650 sodium-ion cells (hard carbon⎪⎪Na<sub>x</sub>Ni<sub>y</sub>Fe<sub>z</sub>Mn<sub>1-y-z</sub>O<sub>2</sub>) provide a comparable or even higher specific energy (∼128 Wh kg<sup>−1</sup>) than that of graphite⎪⎪LiFePO<sub>4</sub> lithium-ion cells.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34318,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Power Sources Advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666248524000143/pdfft?md5=c49f573427b834c7acc765be9fc797ac&pid=1-s2.0-S2666248524000143-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Power Sources Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666248524000143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recently, the first sodium-ion cells have been commercialized and have become available for consumers. Given, moreover, the exciting announcements by several producers of such battery cells, it is of great interest to analyze these first commercial cells in order to understand which materials are used and how these cells are designed. Herein, two types of commercially available sodium-ion battery cells (cylindrical 1.5 Ah 18650 and 3.5 Ah 26700 cells) are investigated regarding (i) their electrode chemistry, (ii) their thermal properties upon discharge as a function of the applied C rate, (iii) the available specific energy, and (iv) their cell impedance. The data are correlated with the electrode thickness and electrode area obtained from an ex situ (ante-mortem) analysis of the 18650 cells, and discussed in comparison with the performance metrics reported for commercial lithium-ion cells. This comparison reveals that the herein studied 18650 sodium-ion cells (hard carbon⎪⎪NaxNiyFezMn1-y-zO2) provide a comparable or even higher specific energy (∼128 Wh kg−1) than that of graphite⎪⎪LiFePO4 lithium-ion cells.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估商用 18650 和 26700 钠离子电池并与成熟的锂离子电池进行比较
最近,第一批钠离子电池实现了商业化,并开始向消费者供应。此外,鉴于几家生产商宣布推出此类电池,人们对分析这些首批商用电池非常感兴趣,以便了解这些电池使用了哪些材料以及是如何设计的。本文研究了两种市售钠离子电池(1.5 Ah 18650 和 3.5 Ah 26700 的圆柱形电池)的以下方面:(i) 其电极化学性质;(ii) 放电时的热特性与所应用的 C 率的函数关系;(iii) 可用比能量;(iv) 电池阻抗。这些数据与通过对 18650 电池进行原位(死前)分析获得的电极厚度和电极面积相关联,并与商用锂离子电池的性能指标进行了比较讨论。比较结果表明,本文研究的 18650 钠离子电池(硬碳⎪⎪NaxNiyFezMn1-y-zO2)的比能量(∼128 Wh kg-1)与石墨⎪⎪LiFePO4锂离子电池相当,甚至更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
64 days
期刊最新文献
The implementation of a voltage-based tunneling mechanism in aging models for lithium-ion batteries Electronic structure evolution upon lithiation: A Li K-edge study of silicon oxide anode through X-ray Raman spectroscopy Ionic liquids with sulfinyl-functionalized imide anion and their lithium electrolytes: (I) Physical and electrochemical properties Tri-sulfur radical trapping in lithium–sulfur batteries Establishing Li-acetylide (Li2C2) as functional element in solid-electrolyte interphases in lithium-ion batteries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1