Small-class effects on science achievement in secondary education

IF 2.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Studies in Educational Evaluation Pub Date : 2024-05-18 DOI:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101368
Ting Shen
{"title":"Small-class effects on science achievement in secondary education","authors":"Ting Shen","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Small classes may affect students’ science achievement, but research evidence for small-class effects on science achievement in secondary education has been scarce. To fill this literature gap, this study examines small-class effects on 15-year-old students’ science achievement using the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2015 data from 26 countries including 24 European countries plus U.S. and Canada. To reduce confounding factors and estimation bias, propensity score analysis was conducted to control significant differences between students in small versus non-small classes on important observed covariates. Results indicate that the effects of small classes on science achievement were statistically significant and negative in 9 countries (e.g., Germany) whereas in other 17 countries small-class effects were non-significant. Fixed-effects meta-analysis was utilized to combine effect sizes, and findings reveal that the effects of small classes were significant and negative, suggesting that students in non-small classes had higher science achievement, but the overall effect size was small.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 101368"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X24000476","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Small classes may affect students’ science achievement, but research evidence for small-class effects on science achievement in secondary education has been scarce. To fill this literature gap, this study examines small-class effects on 15-year-old students’ science achievement using the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2015 data from 26 countries including 24 European countries plus U.S. and Canada. To reduce confounding factors and estimation bias, propensity score analysis was conducted to control significant differences between students in small versus non-small classes on important observed covariates. Results indicate that the effects of small classes on science achievement were statistically significant and negative in 9 countries (e.g., Germany) whereas in other 17 countries small-class effects were non-significant. Fixed-effects meta-analysis was utilized to combine effect sizes, and findings reveal that the effects of small classes were significant and negative, suggesting that students in non-small classes had higher science achievement, but the overall effect size was small.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小班对中学科学成绩的影响
小班教学可能会影响学生的科学成绩,但有关小班教学对中学科学成绩影响的研究证据却很少。为了填补这一文献空白,本研究利用国际学生评估项目(PISA)2015 年的数据,考察了小班对 15 岁学生科学成绩的影响,这些数据来自 26 个国家,包括 24 个欧洲国家以及美国和加拿大。为减少混杂因素和估计偏差,研究采用了倾向得分分析法,以控制小班与非小班学生在重要观测协变量上的显著差异。结果表明,在 9 个国家(如德国),小班对科学成绩的影响在统计学上是显著的负向影响,而在其他 17 个国家,小班的影响并不显著。利用固定效应荟萃分析来合并效应大小,结果显示小班效应显著且为负,表明非小班学生的科学成绩更高,但总体效应大小较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
90
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Studies in Educational Evaluation publishes original reports of evaluation studies. Four types of articles are published by the journal: (a) Empirical evaluation studies representing evaluation practice in educational systems around the world; (b) Theoretical reflections and empirical studies related to issues involved in the evaluation of educational programs, educational institutions, educational personnel and student assessment; (c) Articles summarizing the state-of-the-art concerning specific topics in evaluation in general or in a particular country or group of countries; (d) Book reviews and brief abstracts of evaluation studies.
期刊最新文献
Preservice teachers’ pedagogical and psychological knowledge: Structure and learning opportunities The effects of peer feedback provision and reception on lower-proficiency EFL learners’ writing development Assessment as learning: Evidence based on meta-analysis and quantitative ethnography research Teaching quality and student achievement inequalities in low- and middle-income countries: A hierarchical linear model analysis Do children speaking indigenous and regional languages benefit equally from updated curricula? A report on a longitudinal quasi-experimental pilot study in Central Asia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1