Underreporting or Failed Notification? Global Botulism Reporting, 2000-2022.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Health Security Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-20 DOI:10.1089/hs.2023.0081
Tristan P Learoyd
{"title":"Underreporting or Failed Notification? Global Botulism Reporting, 2000-2022.","authors":"Tristan P Learoyd","doi":"10.1089/hs.2023.0081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Botulism is a rare, potentially fatal illness caused by botulinum toxins produced by <i>Clostridium</i> bacteria. There are no coordinated worldwide reporting mechanisms for botulism cases and therefore few reliable case frequency estimates. This study aimed to establish an international benchmark for case frequency to determine estimated global rates of underreporting of botulism cases. To this end, a comprehensive, multilingual search of major global and national databases, including gray data and government sources, was performed. Data from case series were pooled, standardized against United Nations midyear population estimates, and analyzed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests to identify normally distributed data series. National incidence rates of normally distributed series were compared with that of the United States, which was considered the gold standard due to its extensive data reported for 2004-2018. A total of 6,932 botulism cases from 59 nations were identified in the literature, with a global case fatality rate of 1.37%. The national mean incidence rate ranged from 0.00 to 8.04 cases per million people, with an international mean incidence rate of 0.62 cases per million people. At the continent level, incidence rates tended toward normal distributions, although few countries outside of North America and Europe exhibited normal distributions. Based on comparisons with the US standard, an estimated 88.71% of botulism cases worldwide were unreported in 2016. Better awareness of botulism among healthcare professionals, coordinated global reporting mechanisms, and research on additional contributing factors to underreporting would enable better understanding of global case frequency, thereby potentially reducing the global incidence of botulism and improving outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12955,"journal":{"name":"Health Security","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Security","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/hs.2023.0081","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Botulism is a rare, potentially fatal illness caused by botulinum toxins produced by Clostridium bacteria. There are no coordinated worldwide reporting mechanisms for botulism cases and therefore few reliable case frequency estimates. This study aimed to establish an international benchmark for case frequency to determine estimated global rates of underreporting of botulism cases. To this end, a comprehensive, multilingual search of major global and national databases, including gray data and government sources, was performed. Data from case series were pooled, standardized against United Nations midyear population estimates, and analyzed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests to identify normally distributed data series. National incidence rates of normally distributed series were compared with that of the United States, which was considered the gold standard due to its extensive data reported for 2004-2018. A total of 6,932 botulism cases from 59 nations were identified in the literature, with a global case fatality rate of 1.37%. The national mean incidence rate ranged from 0.00 to 8.04 cases per million people, with an international mean incidence rate of 0.62 cases per million people. At the continent level, incidence rates tended toward normal distributions, although few countries outside of North America and Europe exhibited normal distributions. Based on comparisons with the US standard, an estimated 88.71% of botulism cases worldwide were unreported in 2016. Better awareness of botulism among healthcare professionals, coordinated global reporting mechanisms, and research on additional contributing factors to underreporting would enable better understanding of global case frequency, thereby potentially reducing the global incidence of botulism and improving outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
报告不足还是通报失败?2000-2022年全球肉毒杆菌报告情况。
肉毒中毒是一种罕见的、可能致命的疾病,由梭状芽孢杆菌产生的肉毒毒素引起。肉毒中毒病例没有协调的全球报告机制,因此很少有可靠的病例频率估计。这项研究旨在建立一个病例频率的国际基准,以确定肉毒中毒病例的全球漏报率。为此,研究人员对全球和各国的主要数据库(包括灰色数据和政府资料来源)进行了全面、多语种的搜索。对病例系列数据进行汇总,根据联合国年中人口估计值进行标准化处理,并使用 Kolmogorov-Smirnov 检验进行分析,以确定正态分布的数据系列。将正态分布序列的全国发病率与美国的发病率进行比较,美国因其 2004-2018 年的大量数据被视为黄金标准。文献共发现了59个国家的6932例肉毒中毒病例,全球病死率为1.37%。全国平均发病率为每百万人0.00例至8.04例,国际平均发病率为每百万人0.62例。从各大洲来看,发病率呈正态分布,但北美和欧洲以外的国家很少呈现正态分布。根据与美国标准的比较,2016年全球估计有88.71%的肉毒中毒病例未报告。提高医护专业人员对肉毒中毒的认识、协调全球报告机制以及研究导致报告不足的其他因素,将有助于更好地了解全球病例发生率,从而有可能降低肉毒中毒的全球发病率并改善治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Security
Health Security PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
6.10%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: Health Security is a peer-reviewed journal providing research and essential guidance for the protection of people’s health before and after epidemics or disasters and for ensuring that communities are resilient to major challenges. The Journal explores the issues posed by disease outbreaks and epidemics; natural disasters; biological, chemical, and nuclear accidents or deliberate threats; foodborne outbreaks; and other health emergencies. It offers important insight into how to develop the systems needed to meet these challenges. Taking an interdisciplinary approach, Health Security covers research, innovations, methods, challenges, and ethical and legal dilemmas facing scientific, military, and health organizations. The Journal is a key resource for practitioners in these fields, policymakers, scientific experts, and government officials.
期刊最新文献
The Need for a New Approach to MCI Readiness in the Era of Emergency Department and Hospital Crowding. Pandemic Exercises: Lessons for a New Era in Pandemic Preparedness. Advancing Systematic Change in the National Disaster Medical System (NDMS): Early Implementation of the US Department of Defense NDMS Pilot Program. Frontline Leadership: Nurses in Special Pathogens Preparedness and Response. The Importance of Networks and Relationships: Leveraging the Biocontainment Unit Leadership Workgroup for Special Pathogen Outbreak Response.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1