Utero-cervical angle to predict the risk of spontaneous preterm birth: a review of literature.

IF 1.6 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Minerva obstetrics and gynecology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-21 DOI:10.23736/S2724-606X.24.05433-2
Alice Giorno, Sara Mari, Enrico M Rispoli, Lucio M Cipullo, Luigi Manzo, Gabriele Saccone, Antonio Raffone, Antonio Mollo
{"title":"Utero-cervical angle to predict the risk of spontaneous preterm birth: a review of literature.","authors":"Alice Giorno, Sara Mari, Enrico M Rispoli, Lucio M Cipullo, Luigi Manzo, Gabriele Saccone, Antonio Raffone, Antonio Mollo","doi":"10.23736/S2724-606X.24.05433-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this paper was to evaluate the predictive role of the uterocervical angle (UCA) in spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of the literature was performed including all studies reporting the association between UCA and sPTB. Searches were performed with the use of a combination of keywords: \"cervical length,\" \"uterocervical angle,\" and \"preterm birth\" from inception of each database to March 2022. The statistical evaluations were carried out using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis version 3 (Biostat Inc. USA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen studies all conducted on the second trimester UCA as well as its association with sPTB were included in this study. In all studies the measurements of cervical length (CL) and UCA were performer in the second trimester, except in one that in the third trimester. In most studies the CL is greater than 30 mm and the UCA is greater than 110 °. In seven studies women with symptoms were considered while in 8 studies the women were asymptomatic.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is too early for it to reach a firm conclusion on UCA utilization in clinical settings. A higher UCA measurement (greater than 150°) is an important risk factor for deliveries before 37 weeks' gestation. It provides a higher diagnostic performance in high risk patients than the CL measurement. However, the most relevant ultrasound parameter for the prediction of delivery within the next few data in women with preterm delivery remains the cervical length. There is a need to consider both markers and create protocols so that the values obtained with UCA and those with CL can make a real contribution to decisions to be made rather than using only CL.</p>","PeriodicalId":18572,"journal":{"name":"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"370-375"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-606X.24.05433-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this paper was to evaluate the predictive role of the uterocervical angle (UCA) in spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB).

Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed including all studies reporting the association between UCA and sPTB. Searches were performed with the use of a combination of keywords: "cervical length," "uterocervical angle," and "preterm birth" from inception of each database to March 2022. The statistical evaluations were carried out using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis version 3 (Biostat Inc. USA).

Results: Sixteen studies all conducted on the second trimester UCA as well as its association with sPTB were included in this study. In all studies the measurements of cervical length (CL) and UCA were performer in the second trimester, except in one that in the third trimester. In most studies the CL is greater than 30 mm and the UCA is greater than 110 °. In seven studies women with symptoms were considered while in 8 studies the women were asymptomatic.

Conclusions: It is too early for it to reach a firm conclusion on UCA utilization in clinical settings. A higher UCA measurement (greater than 150°) is an important risk factor for deliveries before 37 weeks' gestation. It provides a higher diagnostic performance in high risk patients than the CL measurement. However, the most relevant ultrasound parameter for the prediction of delivery within the next few data in women with preterm delivery remains the cervical length. There is a need to consider both markers and create protocols so that the values obtained with UCA and those with CL can make a real contribution to decisions to be made rather than using only CL.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测自然早产风险的子宫颈角:文献综述。
背景:本文旨在评估子宫颈角(UCA)对自发性早产的预测作用:本文旨在评估子宫颈角(UCA)对自发性早产(sPTB)的预测作用:方法:对文献进行了系统性回顾,包括所有报道 UCA 与自发性早产(sPTB)相关性的研究。检索时使用了多种关键词:"宫颈长度"、"子宫颈角 "和 "早产"。统计评估采用综合荟萃分析第 3 版(美国生物统计公司):本研究共纳入了 16 项研究,这些研究均针对孕期后三个月的 UCA 及其与母婴传播疾病的关系。在所有研究中,宫颈长度(CL)和 UCA 的测量都是在妊娠后三个月进行的,只有一项研究是在妊娠后三个月进行的。在大多数研究中,CL 大于 30 毫米,UCA 大于 110°。有 7 项研究考虑了有症状的妇女,而有 8 项研究考虑了无症状的妇女:结论:现在就对 UCA 在临床中的应用下定论还为时尚早。较高的 UCA 测量值(大于 150°)是妊娠 37 周前分娩的一个重要风险因素。与 CL 测量值相比,它对高风险患者的诊断性能更高。然而,预测早产妇女在接下来的几个数据内分娩的最相关超声参数仍然是宫颈长度。有必要同时考虑这两个指标并制定方案,以便通过 UCA 和 CL 获得的数值能真正有助于做出决定,而不是仅仅使用 CL。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva obstetrics and gynecology
Minerva obstetrics and gynecology OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
191
期刊最新文献
Use of the Knutson's paste for the treatment of perineal wound dehiscence after vaginal delivery: a single-center clinical experience. Endometriosis and risk factors in pregnancy, labor and delivery: a case-control study. Recipients' age, fresh embryo and blastocyst-stage embryo transfer as favorable factors in a transnational oocyte donation program. The role of colposcopy in HPV vaccination era. The predictive role of uterocervical angle in labor outcomes: a narrative review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1