Gender and Mentorship in Military Medicine: A Survey Study.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Military Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1093/milmed/usae261
Rebekah Cole, Kaitlin Zurbrugg, Yen Lee, Ting Dong, Jessica Bunin, Guinevere Granite, Amber Barak, Sherri L Rudinsky
{"title":"Gender and Mentorship in Military Medicine: A Survey Study.","authors":"Rebekah Cole, Kaitlin Zurbrugg, Yen Lee, Ting Dong, Jessica Bunin, Guinevere Granite, Amber Barak, Sherri L Rudinsky","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usae261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mentorship is essential for professional development and advancement within the military. In civilian medicine, the intersection between gender and mentorship holds important implications for research opportunities, academic success, and career progression. However, the intersection of gender and mentorship has not yet been explored within the field of military medicine. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to investigate the role of gender in mentorship within the field of military medicine.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We investigated gender and mentorship within military medicine by developing and distributing a 16-item Likert survey to active-duty military physicians. We used the Chi-squared test of independence and the independent samples t-test to examine the role of gender in mentorship among the 16 questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The male respondents reported more same-gender mentors than females (male [M]: 61.9% vs. female [F]: 33.0%), whereas the female respondents had significantly more mentors of the opposite gender than males (M: 12.4% vs. F: 47.3%). A higher proportion of males indicated no preference compared to females. Conversely, a significant preference for a same-sex mentor was expressed by female respondents compared to male respondents (M: 5.2% vs. F: 30.1%). In contrast, female respondents considered having a mentor more important than their male counterparts (t(206) = -2.26, P = .012, F: 3.86 vs. M: 3.57). Both male and female respondents had significantly more female mentees ($\\chi _{\\left( 1 \\right)}^2$ = 12.92, P < .001, Cramer's V = 0.254).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While the female participants in our study preferred female mentors, the male participants had more same-gender mentors than the female participants. In addition, more females reported that they did not have the time to be mentored. Our results, therefore, suggest that training males to be better mentors to females and providing accessible mentorship training to females may promote equitable career development within military medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":18638,"journal":{"name":"Military Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Military Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usae261","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Mentorship is essential for professional development and advancement within the military. In civilian medicine, the intersection between gender and mentorship holds important implications for research opportunities, academic success, and career progression. However, the intersection of gender and mentorship has not yet been explored within the field of military medicine. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to investigate the role of gender in mentorship within the field of military medicine.

Materials and methods: We investigated gender and mentorship within military medicine by developing and distributing a 16-item Likert survey to active-duty military physicians. We used the Chi-squared test of independence and the independent samples t-test to examine the role of gender in mentorship among the 16 questions.

Results: The male respondents reported more same-gender mentors than females (male [M]: 61.9% vs. female [F]: 33.0%), whereas the female respondents had significantly more mentors of the opposite gender than males (M: 12.4% vs. F: 47.3%). A higher proportion of males indicated no preference compared to females. Conversely, a significant preference for a same-sex mentor was expressed by female respondents compared to male respondents (M: 5.2% vs. F: 30.1%). In contrast, female respondents considered having a mentor more important than their male counterparts (t(206) = -2.26, P = .012, F: 3.86 vs. M: 3.57). Both male and female respondents had significantly more female mentees ($\chi _{\left( 1 \right)}^2$ = 12.92, P < .001, Cramer's V = 0.254).

Conclusions: While the female participants in our study preferred female mentors, the male participants had more same-gender mentors than the female participants. In addition, more females reported that they did not have the time to be mentored. Our results, therefore, suggest that training males to be better mentors to females and providing accessible mentorship training to females may promote equitable career development within military medicine.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
军事医学中的性别与导师制度:调查研究。
导言:在军队中,导师制对专业发展和晋升至关重要。在民用医学领域,性别与导师制之间的交叉对研究机会、学术成功和职业发展具有重要影响。然而,在军事医学领域,性别与导师制之间的交集尚未得到探讨。因此,本研究旨在调查性别在军事医学领域导师制中的作用:我们制定并向现役军医分发了一份包含 16 个项目的李克特调查问卷,以此调查军事医学领域中的性别与导师关系。我们使用卡方检验(Chi-squared test of independence)和独立样本 t 检验(independent samples t-test)来研究 16 个问题中性别在导师关系中的作用:结果:男性受访者报告的同性导师多于女性(男性[M]:61.9% 对女性[F]:33.0%),而女性受访者报告的异性导师明显多于男性(男性[M]:12.4% 对女性[F]:47.3%)。与女性相比,男性表示没有偏好的比例更高。相反,与男性受访者相比,女性受访者对同性导师有明显偏好(男:5.2%;女:30.1%)。相比之下,女性受访者认为导师比男性受访者更重要(t(206) = -2.26,P = .012,女方:3.86 对男方:3.57)。男性和女性受访者都有明显更多的女性被指导者($\chi _{\left( 1 \right)}^2$=12.92,P 结论:虽然我们研究中的女性参与者更喜欢女性导师,但男性参与者拥有的同性导师要多于女性参与者。此外,更多女性表示她们没有时间接受指导。因此,我们的研究结果表明,培训男性成为女性更好的导师,并为女性提供方便的导师培训,可以促进军事医学领域的公平职业发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Military Medicine
Military Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
393
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Military Medicine is the official international journal of AMSUS. Articles published in the journal are peer-reviewed scientific papers, case reports, and editorials. The journal also publishes letters to the editor. The objective of the journal is to promote awareness of federal medicine by providing a forum for responsible discussion of common ideas and problems relevant to federal healthcare. Its mission is: To increase healthcare education by providing scientific and other information to its readers; to facilitate communication; and to offer a prestige publication for members’ writings.
期刊最新文献
Fatigue and Sleep-related Impairment as Predictors of the Effect of Nonpharmacological Therapies for Active duty Service Members With Chronic Pain: A Secondary Analysis of a Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial. Challenges to School Success Among Children in U.S. Military Families. Combat-Relevant Anesthesia Fellowships Help Sustain the Army's Multidomain Medical Force. Preparing Military Interprofessional Health Care Teams for Effective Collaboration. Synopsis of the 2023 U.S. Department of VA and U.S. DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Pregnancy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1