ERAS following Gastrectomy for Octo- and Nonagenarians: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-21 DOI:10.1089/lap.2024.0058
James Tankel, Giancarlo Sticca, Anitha Kammili, Mehrnoush Dehghani, Rawan Sakalla, Nabeel Ahmed, Andrew Meng, Sara Najmeh, Jonathan Spicer, Jonathan Cools-Lartigue, Lorenzo Ferri, Carmen Mueller
{"title":"ERAS following Gastrectomy for Octo- and Nonagenarians: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.","authors":"James Tankel, Giancarlo Sticca, Anitha Kammili, Mehrnoush Dehghani, Rawan Sakalla, Nabeel Ahmed, Andrew Meng, Sara Najmeh, Jonathan Spicer, Jonathan Cools-Lartigue, Lorenzo Ferri, Carmen Mueller","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> The safety and efficacy of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) following elective gastrectomy for gastric cancer in patients >80 years of age are not well described. The aim of this study was to explore whether an ERAS protocol following gastrectomy in this age group can be safely implemented and reduce postoperative length of stay. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A retrospective, single-center analysis was performed. All patients >80 years of age with gastric cancer undergoing elective subtotal and total gastrectomy between January 2010 and December 2021 were identified. With the implementation of an ERAS protocol in January 2016, patients treated beforehand were allocated to Group A (pre-ERAS) and Group B (ERAS). The length of stay, incidence of postoperative complications and representation/readmission to the hospital were compared between the groups. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of the 221 patients identified, 56 met the inclusion criteria with 22 patients (39.3%) allocated to Group A and 34 patients (60.7%) to Group B. There were no differences with regard to the type of resection and surgical approach. Length of stay was shorter in Group B (5 days, range 2-27 versus 10 days, 3-109, <i>P</i> = .040). A trend toward more discharges by postoperative day 3 was noted among patients in Group B (7/34, 20.6% versus 2/22, 9.1%, <i>P</i> = .253). There were no differences in the incidence of postoperative complications or readmission hospital between the groups. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Among patients >80 years of age, ERAS following gastrectomy for cancer is associated with a reduced length of stay and can be safely implemented.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2024.0058","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The safety and efficacy of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) following elective gastrectomy for gastric cancer in patients >80 years of age are not well described. The aim of this study was to explore whether an ERAS protocol following gastrectomy in this age group can be safely implemented and reduce postoperative length of stay. Methods: A retrospective, single-center analysis was performed. All patients >80 years of age with gastric cancer undergoing elective subtotal and total gastrectomy between January 2010 and December 2021 were identified. With the implementation of an ERAS protocol in January 2016, patients treated beforehand were allocated to Group A (pre-ERAS) and Group B (ERAS). The length of stay, incidence of postoperative complications and representation/readmission to the hospital were compared between the groups. Results: Of the 221 patients identified, 56 met the inclusion criteria with 22 patients (39.3%) allocated to Group A and 34 patients (60.7%) to Group B. There were no differences with regard to the type of resection and surgical approach. Length of stay was shorter in Group B (5 days, range 2-27 versus 10 days, 3-109, P = .040). A trend toward more discharges by postoperative day 3 was noted among patients in Group B (7/34, 20.6% versus 2/22, 9.1%, P = .253). There were no differences in the incidence of postoperative complications or readmission hospital between the groups. Conclusion: Among patients >80 years of age, ERAS following gastrectomy for cancer is associated with a reduced length of stay and can be safely implemented.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
八旬和非八旬老人胃切除术后的 ERAS:单中心回顾性分析
背景:对于年龄大于 80 岁的胃癌患者,在选择性胃切除术后加强术后恢复(ERAS)的安全性和有效性还没有很好的描述。本研究旨在探讨该年龄组胃切除术后的 ERAS 方案能否安全实施并缩短术后住院时间。研究方法进行回顾性单中心分析。研究对象为 2010 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月间接受择期次全胃切除术和全胃切除术的所有年龄大于 80 岁的胃癌患者。随着2016年1月ERAS方案的实施,之前接受治疗的患者被分配到A组(ERAS前)和B组(ERAS)。比较了两组患者的住院时间、术后并发症发生率和代表率/再次入院率。结果:在确定的 221 名患者中,56 人符合纳入标准,22 人(39.3%)被分配到 A 组,34 人(60.7%)被分配到 B 组。B 组患者的住院时间更短(5 天,2-27 之间;10 天,3-109 之间,P = 040)。B 组患者术后第 3 天出院的人数有增加趋势(7/34,20.6% 对 2/22,9.1%,P = .253)。两组患者的术后并发症发生率和再入院率没有差异。结论在年龄大于 80 岁的癌症患者中,胃切除术后 ERAS 可缩短住院时间,并且可以安全实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques (JLAST) is the leading international peer-reviewed journal for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest thinking and advanced surgical technologies in laparoscopy, endoscopy, NOTES, and robotics. The Journal is ideally suited to surgeons who are early adopters of new technology and techniques. Recognizing that many new technologies and techniques have significant overlap with several surgical specialties, JLAST is the first journal to focus on these topics both in general and pediatric surgery, and includes other surgical subspecialties such as: urology, gynecologic surgery, thoracic surgery, and more.
期刊最新文献
The Effect of External Distractions on Simulated Laparoscopic Performance. Commentary: Innovations in the Management of Lung Cancer. Early Versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, after Percutaneous Gall Bladder Drainage, for Grade II Acute Cholecystitis TG18 in Patients with Concomitant Cardiopulmonary Disease. Initial Experience with Disposable Single-Use Cholangioscope During Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration. Telescopic Dissection as a Cost-Effective Alternative to Balloon Trocar for Preperitoneal Dissection in Total Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1