Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Stress Distribution and Displacement of the Maxilla Following Surgically Assisted Rapid Maxillary Expansion with Tooth- and Bone-Borne Devices.
{"title":"Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Stress Distribution and Displacement of the Maxilla Following Surgically Assisted Rapid Maxillary Expansion with Tooth- and Bone-Borne Devices.","authors":"Mohsen Dalband, Jamal Kashani, Hadi Hashemzehi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the displacement and stress distribution during surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion under different surgical conditions with tooth- and bone-borne devices.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Three-dimensional (3D) finite element model of a maxilla was constructed and an expansion force of 100 N was applied to the left and right molars and premolars with tooth-borne devices and the left and right of mid-palatal sutures at the first molar level with bone-borne devices. Five computer-aided design (CAD) models were simulated as follows and surgical procedures were used: G1: control group (without surgery); G2: Le Fort I osteotomy; G3: Le Fort I osteotomy and para-median osteotomy; G4: Le Fort I osteotomy and pterygomaxillary separation; and G5: Le Fort I osteotomy, para-median osteotomy, and pterygomaxillary separation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Maxillary displacement showed a gradual increase from G1 to G5 in all three planes of space, indicating that Le Fort I osteotomy combined with para-median osteotomy and pterygomaxillary separation produced the greatest displacement of the maxilla with both bone- and tooth-borne devices. Surgical relief and bone-borne devices resulted in significantly reduced stress on anchored teeth.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combination of Le Fort I and para-median osteotomy with pterygomaxillary separation seems to be an effective procedure for increasing maxillary expansion, and excessive stress side effects are lowered around the anchored teeth with the use of bone-borne devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":517441,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dentistry (Tehran, Iran)","volume":"12 4","pages":"298-306"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4662768/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dentistry (Tehran, Iran)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the displacement and stress distribution during surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion under different surgical conditions with tooth- and bone-borne devices.
Materials and methods: Three-dimensional (3D) finite element model of a maxilla was constructed and an expansion force of 100 N was applied to the left and right molars and premolars with tooth-borne devices and the left and right of mid-palatal sutures at the first molar level with bone-borne devices. Five computer-aided design (CAD) models were simulated as follows and surgical procedures were used: G1: control group (without surgery); G2: Le Fort I osteotomy; G3: Le Fort I osteotomy and para-median osteotomy; G4: Le Fort I osteotomy and pterygomaxillary separation; and G5: Le Fort I osteotomy, para-median osteotomy, and pterygomaxillary separation.
Results: Maxillary displacement showed a gradual increase from G1 to G5 in all three planes of space, indicating that Le Fort I osteotomy combined with para-median osteotomy and pterygomaxillary separation produced the greatest displacement of the maxilla with both bone- and tooth-borne devices. Surgical relief and bone-borne devices resulted in significantly reduced stress on anchored teeth.
Conclusion: Combination of Le Fort I and para-median osteotomy with pterygomaxillary separation seems to be an effective procedure for increasing maxillary expansion, and excessive stress side effects are lowered around the anchored teeth with the use of bone-borne devices.
研究目的本研究旨在探讨在不同手术条件下,使用牙载和骨载装置进行手术辅助快速上颌骨扩张时的位移和应力分布:构建了上颌骨的三维(3D)有限元模型,并使用牙载装置对左右臼齿和前臼齿施加 100 N 的扩张力,使用骨载装置对第一臼齿水平的腭中缝左右两侧施加 100 N 的扩张力。模拟了以下五个计算机辅助设计(CAD)模型,并使用了手术程序:G1:对照组(未进行手术);G2:Le Fort I 截骨术;G3:Le Fort I 截骨术:G3:Le Fort I截骨术和中线旁截骨术;G4:Le Fort I截骨术和翼颌分离术;G5:Le Fort I截骨术、中线旁截骨术和翼颌分离术:结果:在所有三个空间平面上,上颌骨移位从G1到G5呈逐渐增加趋势,这表明Le Fort I截骨术结合中线旁截骨术和翼颌分离术在骨性和牙性装置上产生的上颌骨移位最大。结论:Le Fort I截骨术与副中线截骨术和翼颌分离术的结合使用,在骨性和牙性装置中产生的上颌骨移位最大:结论:将 Le Fort I 和副中线截骨术与翼颌分离术相结合似乎是增加上颌骨扩张的有效手术,使用骨性装置可降低固定牙齿周围的过度应力副作用。