Understanding passengers' intermodal travel behavior to improve air-rail service: A case study of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q2 TRANSPORTATION Journal of Air Transport Management Pub Date : 2024-05-21 DOI:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2024.102615
Lin Chen , Enjian Yao , Yang Yang , Long Pan , ShaSha Liu
{"title":"Understanding passengers' intermodal travel behavior to improve air-rail service: A case study of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration","authors":"Lin Chen ,&nbsp;Enjian Yao ,&nbsp;Yang Yang ,&nbsp;Long Pan ,&nbsp;ShaSha Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.jairtraman.2024.102615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Uneven utilization of airport clusters is a widespread problem, yet China is still planning to build more airports. Intermodal Passenger Transport Service (IPTS), the most typical of which is the Air-Rail Integration Service (ARIS), is one new way to solve this problem. Although some service products have been derived, intermodal travel services are still in their infancy due to problems such as long transfer time and inconvenient connectivity arising from the fact that those products fail to take into account the complexity of transfers between multiple hubs, resulting in a low penetration rate of intermodal services. Therefore, this study constructs a universal Hybrid Choice Model (HCM) framework that includes mode choice and city choice based on an online stated preference (SP) survey about multi-hub intermodal transportation in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration, and introduces travelers' concerns about travel security, comfort, convenience and reliability as attitudinal variables, which expands the research on IPTS. Then the willingness to pay (WTP) for travel service is evaluated to demonstrate intermodal travelers' preference for shorter transfer time, transferring in the metropolis, more reserve time for air than rail, and the impact mechanisms of luggage through-handling service and mutual recognition mechanism of security checks. Last but not least, through scenario testing, we find that the excessive concern for security and comfort among high-educated and high-income passengers with a low tolerance for transfer time will reduce the market share of air-rail. These findings can assist relevant departments and businesses in making more humane plans for intermodal travel and infrastructure construction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14925,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Air Transport Management","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 102615"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Air Transport Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969699724000802","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Uneven utilization of airport clusters is a widespread problem, yet China is still planning to build more airports. Intermodal Passenger Transport Service (IPTS), the most typical of which is the Air-Rail Integration Service (ARIS), is one new way to solve this problem. Although some service products have been derived, intermodal travel services are still in their infancy due to problems such as long transfer time and inconvenient connectivity arising from the fact that those products fail to take into account the complexity of transfers between multiple hubs, resulting in a low penetration rate of intermodal services. Therefore, this study constructs a universal Hybrid Choice Model (HCM) framework that includes mode choice and city choice based on an online stated preference (SP) survey about multi-hub intermodal transportation in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration, and introduces travelers' concerns about travel security, comfort, convenience and reliability as attitudinal variables, which expands the research on IPTS. Then the willingness to pay (WTP) for travel service is evaluated to demonstrate intermodal travelers' preference for shorter transfer time, transferring in the metropolis, more reserve time for air than rail, and the impact mechanisms of luggage through-handling service and mutual recognition mechanism of security checks. Last but not least, through scenario testing, we find that the excessive concern for security and comfort among high-educated and high-income passengers with a low tolerance for transfer time will reduce the market share of air-rail. These findings can assist relevant departments and businesses in making more humane plans for intermodal travel and infrastructure construction.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解乘客的多式联运出行行为,改善空铁联运服务:京津冀城市群案例研究
机场群利用率不均衡是一个普遍存在的问题,但中国仍在计划建设更多的机场。旅客联运服务(IPTS)是解决这一问题的新途径,其中最典型的是空铁联运服务(ARIS)。虽然目前已经衍生出了一些服务产品,但由于这些产品没有考虑到多枢纽之间换乘的复杂性,存在换乘时间长、衔接不便等问题,导致多式联运服务的普及率较低,目前仍处于起步阶段。因此,本研究基于对京津冀城市群多枢纽联运的在线陈述偏好(SP)调查,构建了一个包含模式选择和城市选择的通用混合选择模型(HCM)框架,并引入旅客对出行安全性、舒适性、便利性和可靠性的关注作为态度变量,拓展了对IPTS的研究。然后,对旅行服务的支付意愿(WTP)进行了评估,展示了多式联运旅客对缩短换乘时间、在大都市内换乘、航空比铁路更多的预留时间的偏好,以及行李直通服务和安检互认机制的影响机制。最后,通过情景测试,我们发现高学历、高收入旅客对安全性和舒适性的过度关注,以及对换乘时间的低容忍度,将降低空铁联运的市场份额。这些发现可以帮助相关部门和企业在多式联运和基础设施建设方面制定更加人性化的规划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
11.70%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: The Journal of Air Transport Management (JATM) sets out to address, through high quality research articles and authoritative commentary, the major economic, management and policy issues facing the air transport industry today. It offers practitioners and academics an international and dynamic forum for analysis and discussion of these issues, linking research and practice and stimulating interaction between the two. The refereed papers in the journal cover all the major sectors of the industry (airlines, airports, air traffic management) as well as related areas such as tourism management and logistics. Papers are blind reviewed, normally by two referees, chosen for their specialist knowledge. The journal provides independent, original and rigorous analysis in the areas of: • Policy, regulation and law • Strategy • Operations • Marketing • Economics and finance • Sustainability
期刊最新文献
Stochastic infection risk models for aircraft seat assignment considering passenger vaccination status and seat location Addressing the impact of airport pricing, investment and operations on greenhouse gas emissions Editorial Board A privacy-preserving federated learning approach for airline upgrade optimization Exploring prediction accuracy for optimal taxi times in airport operations using various machine learning models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1