Stochastic infection risk models for aircraft seat assignment considering passenger vaccination status and seat location

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q2 TRANSPORTATION Journal of Air Transport Management Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2024.102707
Ching-Hui Tang, Yi-Hsiang Hsu
{"title":"Stochastic infection risk models for aircraft seat assignment considering passenger vaccination status and seat location","authors":"Ching-Hui Tang,&nbsp;Yi-Hsiang Hsu","doi":"10.1016/j.jairtraman.2024.102707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We study optimal aircraft seat assignment for infectious diseases in view of the stochastic risk of infection for a passenger assigned to a seat. The stochastic risk is based on the passengers' vaccination status and the different risk probability distributions corresponding to seat locations at window, middle, or aisle. In addition, the influence of groups of passengers who prefer to be seated together on the risk of infection in the cabin is also analyzed. A stochastic programming technique is applied to develop both non-grouped and grouped scenario-based models. The objective is to minimize the risk of infection for the worst-case scenario, as formulated by the Min-Max objective approach. Numerical tests utilizing statistical data from 2369 flights in Taiwan were performed. The results show that the consideration of passengers’ vaccination status during seat assignment is useful, reducing the average risk of infection in the cabin by half. Grouped seat assignment does not seem to have a significant influence on the risk of infection, with an increase of only 1.28 and 1.25 times compared with non-grouped seat assignment. The recommendations are that more heavily vaccinated passengers be assigned to aisle seats, while passengers who have received fewer doses be assigned to window seats. In addition, considering the limited impact of group seating on the risk of infection, it may not be necessary for an airline to decline to accommodate such requests.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14925,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Air Transport Management","volume":"122 ","pages":"Article 102707"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Air Transport Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969699724001728","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We study optimal aircraft seat assignment for infectious diseases in view of the stochastic risk of infection for a passenger assigned to a seat. The stochastic risk is based on the passengers' vaccination status and the different risk probability distributions corresponding to seat locations at window, middle, or aisle. In addition, the influence of groups of passengers who prefer to be seated together on the risk of infection in the cabin is also analyzed. A stochastic programming technique is applied to develop both non-grouped and grouped scenario-based models. The objective is to minimize the risk of infection for the worst-case scenario, as formulated by the Min-Max objective approach. Numerical tests utilizing statistical data from 2369 flights in Taiwan were performed. The results show that the consideration of passengers’ vaccination status during seat assignment is useful, reducing the average risk of infection in the cabin by half. Grouped seat assignment does not seem to have a significant influence on the risk of infection, with an increase of only 1.28 and 1.25 times compared with non-grouped seat assignment. The recommendations are that more heavily vaccinated passengers be assigned to aisle seats, while passengers who have received fewer doses be assigned to window seats. In addition, considering the limited impact of group seating on the risk of infection, it may not be necessary for an airline to decline to accommodate such requests.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
考虑乘客疫苗接种状况和座位位置的飞机座位分配随机感染风险模型
我们研究的是针对传染病的最佳飞机座位分配,考虑的是分配到座位上的乘客的随机感染风险。随机风险基于乘客的疫苗接种情况以及与靠窗、中间或过道座位位置相对应的不同风险概率分布。此外,还分析了喜欢坐在一起的乘客群体对机舱内感染风险的影响。随机编程技术被用于开发非分组和分组情景模型。其目标是通过最小-最大目标法将最坏情况下的感染风险降至最低。利用台湾 2369 次航班的统计数据进行了数值测试。结果表明,在座位分配时考虑乘客的疫苗接种情况是有用的,可将机舱内的平均感染风险降低一半。分组分配座位似乎对感染风险影响不大,与不分组分配座位相比,只增加了 1.28 倍和 1.25 倍。建议将接种疫苗较多的乘客分配到靠走道的座位,而将接种疫苗较少的乘客分配到靠窗的座位。此外,考虑到分组座位对感染风险的影响有限,航空公司可能没有必要拒绝满足此类要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
11.70%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: The Journal of Air Transport Management (JATM) sets out to address, through high quality research articles and authoritative commentary, the major economic, management and policy issues facing the air transport industry today. It offers practitioners and academics an international and dynamic forum for analysis and discussion of these issues, linking research and practice and stimulating interaction between the two. The refereed papers in the journal cover all the major sectors of the industry (airlines, airports, air traffic management) as well as related areas such as tourism management and logistics. Papers are blind reviewed, normally by two referees, chosen for their specialist knowledge. The journal provides independent, original and rigorous analysis in the areas of: • Policy, regulation and law • Strategy • Operations • Marketing • Economics and finance • Sustainability
期刊最新文献
Stochastic infection risk models for aircraft seat assignment considering passenger vaccination status and seat location Addressing the impact of airport pricing, investment and operations on greenhouse gas emissions Editorial Board A privacy-preserving federated learning approach for airline upgrade optimization Exploring prediction accuracy for optimal taxi times in airport operations using various machine learning models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1