The Arcus Experience: Bridging the Data Science Gap for Nurse Researchers.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING Nursing Research Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-10 DOI:10.1097/NNR.0000000000000748
Eloise L Flood, Lorene Schweig, Elizabeth B Froh, Warren D Frankenberger, Ruth M Lebet, Mei-Lin Chen-Lim, K Joy Payton, Margaret A McCabe
{"title":"The Arcus Experience: Bridging the Data Science Gap for Nurse Researchers.","authors":"Eloise L Flood, Lorene Schweig, Elizabeth B Froh, Warren D Frankenberger, Ruth M Lebet, Mei-Lin Chen-Lim, K Joy Payton, Margaret A McCabe","doi":"10.1097/NNR.0000000000000748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For years, nurse researchers have been called upon to engage with \"big data\" in the electronic health record (EHR) by leading studies focusing on nurse-centric patient outcomes and providing clinical analysis of potential outcome indicators. However, the current gap in nurses' data science education and training poses a significant barrier.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to evaluate the viability of conducting nurse-led, big-data research projects within a custom-designed computational laboratory and examine the support required by a team of researchers with little to no big-data experience.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four nurse-led research teams developed a research question reliant on existing EHR data. Each team was given its own virtual computational laboratory populated with raw data. A data science education team provided instruction in coding languages-primarily structured query language and R-and data science techniques to organize and analyze the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three research teams have completed studies, resulting in one manuscript currently undergoing peer review and two manuscripts in progress. The final team is performing data analysis. Five barriers and five facilitators to big-data projects were identified.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>As the data science learning curve is steep, organizations need to help bridge the gap between what is currently taught in doctoral nursing programs and what is required of clinical nurse researchers to successfully engage in big-data methods. In addition, clinical nurse researchers require protected research time and a data science infrastructure that supports novice efforts with education, mentorship, and computational laboratory resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":49723,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Research","volume":" ","pages":"406-412"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000748","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: For years, nurse researchers have been called upon to engage with "big data" in the electronic health record (EHR) by leading studies focusing on nurse-centric patient outcomes and providing clinical analysis of potential outcome indicators. However, the current gap in nurses' data science education and training poses a significant barrier.

Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the viability of conducting nurse-led, big-data research projects within a custom-designed computational laboratory and examine the support required by a team of researchers with little to no big-data experience.

Methods: Four nurse-led research teams developed a research question reliant on existing EHR data. Each team was given its own virtual computational laboratory populated with raw data. A data science education team provided instruction in coding languages-primarily structured query language and R-and data science techniques to organize and analyze the data.

Results: Three research teams have completed studies, resulting in one manuscript currently undergoing peer review and two manuscripts in progress. The final team is performing data analysis. Five barriers and five facilitators to big-data projects were identified.

Discussion: As the data science learning curve is steep, organizations need to help bridge the gap between what is currently taught in doctoral nursing programs and what is required of clinical nurse researchers to successfully engage in big-data methods. In addition, clinical nurse researchers require protected research time and a data science infrastructure that supports novice efforts with education, mentorship, and computational laboratory resources.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Arcus 经验:为护士研究人员缩小数据科学差距。
背景:多年来,护士研究人员一直被要求参与电子健康记录(EHR)中的 "大数据",领导以护士为中心的患者预后研究,并提供潜在预后指标的临床分析。然而,目前护士在数据科学教育和培训方面的差距构成了重大障碍:我们旨在评估在定制设计的计算实验室内开展由护士领导的大数据研究项目的可行性,并研究由几乎没有大数据经验的研究人员组成的团队所需的支持:方法:四个由护士领导的研究团队根据现有的电子病历数据提出了一个研究问题。每个团队都有自己的虚拟计算实验室,实验室里有原始数据。数据科学教育团队提供编码语言(主要是结构化查询语言和 R)以及数据科学技术方面的指导,以组织和分析数据:结果:三个研究小组完成了研究,其中一份手稿正在接受同行评审,两份手稿正在撰写中。最后一个团队正在进行数据分析。结果:三个研究小组完成了研究,其中一份手稿正在接受同行评审,两份手稿正在撰写中:由于数据科学的学习曲线非常陡峭,各组织需要帮助弥合目前护理博士课程的教学内容与临床护士研究人员成功参与大数据方法的要求之间的差距。此外,临床护士研究人员还需要受保护的研究时间和数据科学基础设施,以便通过教育、指导和计算实验室资源支持新手的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Research
Nursing Research 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
102
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Research is a peer-reviewed journal celebrating over 60 years as the most sought-after nursing resource; it offers more depth, more detail, and more of what today''s nurses demand. Nursing Research covers key issues, including health promotion, human responses to illness, acute care nursing research, symptom management, cost-effectiveness, vulnerable populations, health services, and community-based nursing studies. Each issue highlights the latest research techniques, quantitative and qualitative studies, and new state-of-the-art methodological strategies, including information not yet found in textbooks. Expert commentaries and briefs are also included. In addition to 6 issues per year, Nursing Research from time to time publishes supplemental content not found anywhere else.
期刊最新文献
Preparing PhD Students for Tenure-Track Faculty Positions. Cognitive Interventions in Heart Failure Segue to Thoughts on Symptom Science in Nursing Research. Health Implications of Black Identity Among Latinos: A Call for Afro-Latina Representation in Maternal Child Health Research. In Search of Nursing Science. Nursing Science and the Law.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1