Pinpointing the causal influences of stomatal anatomy and behavior on minimum, operational, and maximum leaf surface conductance.

IF 6.5 1区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES Plant Physiology Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1093/plphys/kiae292
Marissa E Ochoa, Christian Henry, Grace P John, Camila D Medeiros, Ruihua Pan, Christine Scoffoni, Thomas N Buckley, Lawren Sack
{"title":"Pinpointing the causal influences of stomatal anatomy and behavior on minimum, operational, and maximum leaf surface conductance.","authors":"Marissa E Ochoa, Christian Henry, Grace P John, Camila D Medeiros, Ruihua Pan, Christine Scoffoni, Thomas N Buckley, Lawren Sack","doi":"10.1093/plphys/kiae292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Leaf surface conductance to water vapor and CO2 across the epidermis (gleaf) strongly determines the rates of gas exchange. Thus, clarifying the drivers of gleaf has important implications for resolving the mechanisms of photosynthetic productivity and leaf and plant responses and tolerance to drought. It is well recognized that gleaf is a function of the conductances of the stomata (gs) and of the epidermis + cuticle (gec). Yet, controversies have arisen around the relative roles of stomatal density (d) and size (s), fractional stomatal opening (α; aperture relative to maximum), and gec in determining gleaf. Resolving the importance of these drivers is critical across the range of leaf surface conductances, from strong stomatal closure under drought (gleaf,min), to typical opening for photosynthesis (gleaf,op), to maximum achievable opening (gleaf,max). We derived equations and analyzed a compiled database of published and measured data for approximately 200 species and genotypes. On average, within and across species, higher gleaf,min was determined 10 times more strongly by α and gec than by d and negligibly by s; higher gleaf,op was determined approximately equally by α (47%) and by stomatal anatomy (45% by d and 8% by s), and negligibly by gec; and higher gleaf,max was determined entirely by d. These findings clarify how diversity in stomatal functioning arises from multiple structural and physiological causes with importance shifting with context. The rising importance of d relative to α, from gleaf,min to gleaf,op, enables even species with low gleaf,min, which can retain leaves through drought, to possess high d and thereby achieve rapid gas exchange in periods of high water availability.</p>","PeriodicalId":20101,"journal":{"name":"Plant Physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/plphys/kiae292","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Leaf surface conductance to water vapor and CO2 across the epidermis (gleaf) strongly determines the rates of gas exchange. Thus, clarifying the drivers of gleaf has important implications for resolving the mechanisms of photosynthetic productivity and leaf and plant responses and tolerance to drought. It is well recognized that gleaf is a function of the conductances of the stomata (gs) and of the epidermis + cuticle (gec). Yet, controversies have arisen around the relative roles of stomatal density (d) and size (s), fractional stomatal opening (α; aperture relative to maximum), and gec in determining gleaf. Resolving the importance of these drivers is critical across the range of leaf surface conductances, from strong stomatal closure under drought (gleaf,min), to typical opening for photosynthesis (gleaf,op), to maximum achievable opening (gleaf,max). We derived equations and analyzed a compiled database of published and measured data for approximately 200 species and genotypes. On average, within and across species, higher gleaf,min was determined 10 times more strongly by α and gec than by d and negligibly by s; higher gleaf,op was determined approximately equally by α (47%) and by stomatal anatomy (45% by d and 8% by s), and negligibly by gec; and higher gleaf,max was determined entirely by d. These findings clarify how diversity in stomatal functioning arises from multiple structural and physiological causes with importance shifting with context. The rising importance of d relative to α, from gleaf,min to gleaf,op, enables even species with low gleaf,min, which can retain leaves through drought, to possess high d and thereby achieve rapid gas exchange in periods of high water availability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
准确定位气孔解剖和行为对最小、有效和最大叶面传导的因果影响。
叶片表皮对水蒸气和二氧化碳的传导(叶面传导)在很大程度上决定了气体交换的速率。因此,弄清叶面的驱动因素对于解决光合生产力、叶片和植物对干旱的反应和耐受机制具有重要意义。众所周知,气叶是气孔传导(gs)和表皮+角质层传导(gec)的函数。然而,围绕气孔密度(d)和大小(s)、气孔开孔率(α;相对于最大开孔率的孔径)和气孔导度(gec)在决定叶面积方面的相对作用却出现了争议。从干旱时的气孔强烈关闭(gleaf,最小)到光合作用时的典型开放(gleaf,开),再到可实现的最大开放(gleaf,最大),在叶面传导率范围内,解决这些驱动因素的重要性至关重要。我们推导出方程,并分析了一个已公布和测量的数据库,其中包含约 200 个物种和基因型的数据。平均而言,在不同物种内部和不同物种之间,α 和 gec 对较高的气孔叶面积(min)的决定作用是 d 的十倍,而 s 的作用可忽略不计;α 对较高的气孔叶面积(op)的决定作用(47%)与气孔解剖学的决定作用(45% 由 d 决定,8% 由 s 决定)大致相当,而 gec 的作用可忽略不计;而较高的气孔叶面积(max)则完全由 d 决定。相对于 α,d 的重要性从 gleaf, min 到 gleaf, op 不断上升,这使得即使是 gleaf, min 较低的物种(它们可以在干旱中保留叶片)也能拥有较高的 d,从而在高水分供应期实现快速气体交换。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Plant Physiology
Plant Physiology 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Plant Physiology® is a distinguished and highly respected journal with a rich history dating back to its establishment in 1926. It stands as a leading international publication in the field of plant biology, covering a comprehensive range of topics from the molecular and structural aspects of plant life to systems biology and ecophysiology. Recognized as the most highly cited journal in plant sciences, Plant Physiology® is a testament to its commitment to excellence and the dissemination of groundbreaking research. As the official publication of the American Society of Plant Biologists, Plant Physiology® upholds rigorous peer-review standards, ensuring that the scientific community receives the highest quality research. The journal releases 12 issues annually, providing a steady stream of new findings and insights to its readership.
期刊最新文献
Transcription factor PagWRKY33 regulates gibberellin signaling and immune receptor pathways in Populus. AlGrow: a graphical interface for easy, fast and accurate area and growth analysis of heterogeneously colored targets. Epigenetic control of T-DNA during transgenesis and pathogenesis. Metabolic Flux Analysis to Increase Oil in Seeds. Mutation of GLR2 confers enhanced glufosinate resistance and salt tolerance in rice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1