Comparison of an Unlabeled Probe High-Resolution Melting Analysis Assay (HRMA) for Factor V Leiden 1691 G/A Mutation to a Fluorogenic 5' Nuclease PCR Hydrolysis Assay.

IF 1.8 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1093/jalm/jfae039
Heping Han, Sally Lewis
{"title":"Comparison of an Unlabeled Probe High-Resolution Melting Analysis Assay (HRMA) for Factor V Leiden 1691 G/A Mutation to a Fluorogenic 5' Nuclease PCR Hydrolysis Assay.","authors":"Heping Han, Sally Lewis","doi":"10.1093/jalm/jfae039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The clinically significant Factor V Leiden (FVL) point mutation (1691 G/A) causes replacement of Arg with Gln (glutamine), preventing activated protein C from inactivating Factor V leading to a lengthened clotting process. Individuals with the Factor V Leiden mutations have an increased risk for venous thrombosis. The aim of this study is to compare an unlabeled probe high-resolution melting analysis (HRMA) assay for Factor V Leiden mutation to a TaqMan hydrolysis assay (fluorogenic 5' nuclease PCR hydrolysis assay). HRMA is a post-PCR, homogenous, closed-tube system for the detection of sequence variants. Post-PCR, the amplicons are heated gradually until the melting temperature is reached and the fluorescent dye unbinds from the amplicon and exhibits low fluorescence. A melt-curve analysis is generated that is characteristic of a particular sequence variant. Therefore, HRMA allows for comparison of one base changes in genetic sequences based on their differences in melting rate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Blood samples were collected in EDTA tubes and DNA extracted using the Roche MagNaPure. Reactions of both HRMA and TaqMan were carried out on 3 controls (1691 G/G, 1691 G/A, and 1691 G/G and G/A) and 20 samples.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The genotypes for 3 reference controls purchased from Coriell (F5 1691 G/G, FVL 1691 G/A, and Heterozygote 1691 G/G and G/A) were confirmed by both the HRMA and TaqMan FVL assays. All 20 samples were confirmed to be F5 1691 G/G by both HRMA and TaqMan assays.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Comparing the results of the unlabeled probe HRMA FVL assay with a real-time TaqMan probe end point genotyping assay resulted in 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity for both assays.</p>","PeriodicalId":46361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfae039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The clinically significant Factor V Leiden (FVL) point mutation (1691 G/A) causes replacement of Arg with Gln (glutamine), preventing activated protein C from inactivating Factor V leading to a lengthened clotting process. Individuals with the Factor V Leiden mutations have an increased risk for venous thrombosis. The aim of this study is to compare an unlabeled probe high-resolution melting analysis (HRMA) assay for Factor V Leiden mutation to a TaqMan hydrolysis assay (fluorogenic 5' nuclease PCR hydrolysis assay). HRMA is a post-PCR, homogenous, closed-tube system for the detection of sequence variants. Post-PCR, the amplicons are heated gradually until the melting temperature is reached and the fluorescent dye unbinds from the amplicon and exhibits low fluorescence. A melt-curve analysis is generated that is characteristic of a particular sequence variant. Therefore, HRMA allows for comparison of one base changes in genetic sequences based on their differences in melting rate.

Methods: Blood samples were collected in EDTA tubes and DNA extracted using the Roche MagNaPure. Reactions of both HRMA and TaqMan were carried out on 3 controls (1691 G/G, 1691 G/A, and 1691 G/G and G/A) and 20 samples.

Results: The genotypes for 3 reference controls purchased from Coriell (F5 1691 G/G, FVL 1691 G/A, and Heterozygote 1691 G/G and G/A) were confirmed by both the HRMA and TaqMan FVL assays. All 20 samples were confirmed to be F5 1691 G/G by both HRMA and TaqMan assays.

Conclusions: Comparing the results of the unlabeled probe HRMA FVL assay with a real-time TaqMan probe end point genotyping assay resulted in 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity for both assays.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
因子 V Leiden 1691 G/A 突变的无标记探针高分辨熔融分析测定 (HRMA) 与荧光 5' 核酸酶 PCR 水解测定的比较。
背景:具有临床意义的因子 V Leiden(FVL)点突变(1691 G/A)会导致 Arg 被 Gln(谷氨酰胺)取代,从而阻止活化蛋白 C 使因子 V 失活,导致凝血过程延长。因子 V Leiden 突变的个体罹患静脉血栓的风险会增加。本研究旨在将因子 V Leiden 突变的无标记探针高分辨熔解分析(HRMA)测定与 TaqMan 水解测定(荧光 5' 核酸酶 PCR 水解测定)进行比较。HRMA 是一种用于检测序列变异的聚合酶链反应后、均质、密闭试管系统。在 PCR 后,逐渐加热扩增子,直到达到熔融温度,荧光染料从扩增子上脱落并发出低荧光。熔融曲线分析结果是特定序列变异的特征。因此,HRMA 可以根据熔解率的差异比较基因序列中一个碱基的变化:方法:用 EDTA 管采集血样,用罗氏 MagNaPure 提取 DNA。对 3 个对照(1691 G/G、1691 G/A、1691 G/G 和 G/A)和 20 个样本进行 HRMA 和 TaqMan 反应:结果:通过 HRMA 和 TaqMan FVL 检测,确认了从 Coriell 购买的 3 个参考对照(F5 1691 G/G、FVL 1691 G/A 和杂合子 1691 G/G 和 G/A)的基因型。通过 HRMA 和 TaqMan 检测,所有 20 个样本都被确认为 F5 1691 G/G:结论:将未标记探针的HRMA FVL测定结果与实时TaqMan探针终点基因分型测定结果进行比较,两种测定的灵敏度均为100%,特异性均为100%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine
Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
137
期刊最新文献
Unraveling Uncertainty: The Impact of Biological and Analytical Variation on the Prediction Uncertainty of Categorical Prediction Models. Fundamental Uncertainty: Interplatform Inconsistency of FDA-Cleared Serological Tests. Commentary on Myocarditis or Myositis? Rising, Declining, and Rising of Critical Cardiac Troponin T Levels in a Patient Post Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy. Myocarditis or Myositis? Rising, Declining, and Rising of Critical Cardiac Troponin T Levels in a Patient Post Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy. Point-of-Care Testing Biosafety Decisions: An Investigation Summary Illustrating Current Decision-Making Process in Ontario, Canada.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1