Lin Wang, Rafael C Pulgrossi, Jaclyn Anderson, Ariadna Garcia, Everett H Meyer, James L Zehnder, Benjamin A Pinsky
Background: Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) is a common complication of allogenic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The aGVHD presymptomatic algorithm is comprised of 2 serum biomarkers, suppression of tumorigenicity 2 and regenerating islet-derived 3-alpha. This test was developed to predict severe aGVHD and 6-month nonrelapse mortality (NRM) in allogeneic HCT recipients.
Methods: The medical records of 223 patients tested with the aGVHD presymptomatic algorithm between January 2020 and June 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. Sensitivity and specificity for the prediction of severe aGVHD (grade III or IV) and 6-month NRM were determined. Logistic regression modeling was used to assess the odds ratios of risk factors for severe aGVHD and 6-month NRM. The likelihood ratio test was used to evaluate whether the addition of the aGVHD presymptomatic algorithm improved model fit.
Results: Severe aGVHD occurred in 8.5% of patients, and 6-month NRM was 7.2%. The aGVHD presymptomatic algorithm demonstrated a sensitivity of 21.1% (95% CI, 8.0%-43.9%) and specificity of 83.3% (95% CI, 77.6%-87.9%) for severe aGVHD and a sensitivity of 43.8% (95% CI, 23.1%-66.8%) and specificity of 85.0% (95% CI, 79.5%-89.3%) for 6-month NRM. The addition of results from the aGVHD presymptomatic algorithm to conventional risk factors did not improve prediction of aGVHD but improved prediction of 6-month NRM.
Conclusions: The aGVHD presymptomatic algorithm was suboptimal for routine clinical use. Further development of predictive aGVHD biomarkers may be required to aid in the management of allogeneic HCT recipients.
{"title":"Assessing the Clinical Performance of a Presymptomatic Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease Biomarker Test in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients.","authors":"Lin Wang, Rafael C Pulgrossi, Jaclyn Anderson, Ariadna Garcia, Everett H Meyer, James L Zehnder, Benjamin A Pinsky","doi":"10.1093/jalm/jfaf193","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfaf193","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) is a common complication of allogenic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The aGVHD presymptomatic algorithm is comprised of 2 serum biomarkers, suppression of tumorigenicity 2 and regenerating islet-derived 3-alpha. This test was developed to predict severe aGVHD and 6-month nonrelapse mortality (NRM) in allogeneic HCT recipients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The medical records of 223 patients tested with the aGVHD presymptomatic algorithm between January 2020 and June 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. Sensitivity and specificity for the prediction of severe aGVHD (grade III or IV) and 6-month NRM were determined. Logistic regression modeling was used to assess the odds ratios of risk factors for severe aGVHD and 6-month NRM. The likelihood ratio test was used to evaluate whether the addition of the aGVHD presymptomatic algorithm improved model fit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Severe aGVHD occurred in 8.5% of patients, and 6-month NRM was 7.2%. The aGVHD presymptomatic algorithm demonstrated a sensitivity of 21.1% (95% CI, 8.0%-43.9%) and specificity of 83.3% (95% CI, 77.6%-87.9%) for severe aGVHD and a sensitivity of 43.8% (95% CI, 23.1%-66.8%) and specificity of 85.0% (95% CI, 79.5%-89.3%) for 6-month NRM. The addition of results from the aGVHD presymptomatic algorithm to conventional risk factors did not improve prediction of aGVHD but improved prediction of 6-month NRM.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The aGVHD presymptomatic algorithm was suboptimal for routine clinical use. Further development of predictive aGVHD biomarkers may be required to aid in the management of allogeneic HCT recipients.</p>","PeriodicalId":46361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145960104","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Commentary on Investigating a Possible Cryptic Culprit in Hemolysis.","authors":"Jingcai Wang","doi":"10.1093/jalm/jfaf206","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfaf206","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145946624","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Health literacy and numeracy are broad terms that relate to a patient's understanding of their health information. While there is a substantial amount of research on this topic in a general sense as well as in relation to how deficiencies in these skills impact patients' understanding of laboratory results, little is known regarding the extent to which underlying factors, which are impacted by health literacy/numeracy, affect how patients interpret their results. This literature review attempts to shed light on the current literature on this more focused and narrow issue, including recommendations to address these barriers.
Content: To perform this review, the key terms "health literacy AND numeracy," "health literacy AND laboratory results," and "patient understanding of laboratory test results" were searched in the PubMed Central, Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases. After reviewing articles for inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 16 articles were included. Major themes from the articles utilized were (a) the impact of the laboratory, (b) factors that affect health literacy and numeracy of laboratory data, and (c) recommendations to improve patient understanding and comprehension of their test results.
Summary: Many factors affect patients' comprehension of laboratory data, such as access to this information, data presentation, and holistic influences. Recommendations for improving patient health numeracy of laboratory information are to improve how data is presented to patients and to increase access to supplemental resources via patient portals.
背景:健康素养和算术能力是与患者对其健康信息的理解有关的广义术语。虽然在一般意义上对这一主题进行了大量研究,并涉及这些技能的缺陷如何影响患者对实验室结果的理解,但鲜为人知的是,受卫生素养/计算能力影响的潜在因素在多大程度上影响了患者对结果的解释。这篇文献综述试图阐明当前关于这个更集中和狭隘的问题的文献,包括解决这些障碍的建议。内容:为了进行本综述,在PubMed Central、health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition和Cumulative Index To Nursing AND Allied health Literature (CINAHL)数据库中检索了关键词“健康素养和算术”、“健康素养和实验室结果”和“患者对实验室测试结果的理解”。在审查了纳入和排除标准的文章后,共纳入了16篇文章。所用文章的主要主题是(a)实验室的影响,(b)影响卫生知识和实验室数据计算能力的因素,以及(c)提高患者对其检测结果的理解和理解的建议。总结:许多因素影响患者对实验室数据的理解,如获取这些信息、数据呈现和整体影响。关于提高患者对实验室信息的健康计算能力的建议是,改进向患者提供数据的方式,并增加通过患者门户获取补充资源的机会。
{"title":"Health Literacy/Numeracy-Related Factors Affecting Interpretation of Medical Laboratory Values.","authors":"Rachel L Childs","doi":"10.1093/jalm/jfaf192","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfaf192","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health literacy and numeracy are broad terms that relate to a patient's understanding of their health information. While there is a substantial amount of research on this topic in a general sense as well as in relation to how deficiencies in these skills impact patients' understanding of laboratory results, little is known regarding the extent to which underlying factors, which are impacted by health literacy/numeracy, affect how patients interpret their results. This literature review attempts to shed light on the current literature on this more focused and narrow issue, including recommendations to address these barriers.</p><p><strong>Content: </strong>To perform this review, the key terms \"health literacy AND numeracy,\" \"health literacy AND laboratory results,\" and \"patient understanding of laboratory test results\" were searched in the PubMed Central, Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases. After reviewing articles for inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 16 articles were included. Major themes from the articles utilized were (a) the impact of the laboratory, (b) factors that affect health literacy and numeracy of laboratory data, and (c) recommendations to improve patient understanding and comprehension of their test results.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Many factors affect patients' comprehension of laboratory data, such as access to this information, data presentation, and holistic influences. Recommendations for improving patient health numeracy of laboratory information are to improve how data is presented to patients and to increase access to supplemental resources via patient portals.</p>","PeriodicalId":46361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145946629","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Investigating a Possible Cryptic Culprit in Hemolysis.","authors":"Raeshun T Glover, Valery J Kogler","doi":"10.1093/jalm/jfaf188","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfaf188","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145935495","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Nikita Mohapatra, Randy P Carney, Aijun Wang, Kristin N Grimsrud, Nam K Tran
Background: Rapid, accurate diagnosis in acute and emergent care remains a major challenge, with delays directly impacting patient outcomes. Extracellular vesicles (EVs), nanoscale membranous particles secreted by all cell types and found in virtually all biological fluids, have the potential to transform acute diagnostics as minimally invasive biomarkers. As key intercellular messengers and carriers of biological cargo, EVs reflect the physiological and pathological states of their parent cells. While EV research has largely focused on chronic diseases such as cancer and neurodegeneration, their role in acute pathologies remains under-investigated.
Content: This review describes the current landscape of EVs in laboratory medicine, with a focus on their potential for acute and emergent conditions, including sepsis, stroke, traumatic brain injury, and myocardial infarction. We examine advances in EV isolation and characterization techniques and discuss the unique challenges of implementing these approaches in a clinical setting. In particular, we highlight emerging technologies that aim to address existing barriers, including lack of standardization, long processing times, and limited clinical scalability.
Summary: By summarizing existing knowledge and identifying critical research gaps, this review intends to refocus attention toward EV applications for acute care. As EV-based diagnostics continue to advance, their successful integration into clinical work flows has the potential to significantly transform healthcare delivery, enabling real-time, personalized diagnostics and improving health outcomes across a wide range of settings.
{"title":"Extracellular Vesicles for Acute Care Testing: A Review of Potential Laboratory Applications.","authors":"Nikita Mohapatra, Randy P Carney, Aijun Wang, Kristin N Grimsrud, Nam K Tran","doi":"10.1093/jalm/jfaf200","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfaf200","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rapid, accurate diagnosis in acute and emergent care remains a major challenge, with delays directly impacting patient outcomes. Extracellular vesicles (EVs), nanoscale membranous particles secreted by all cell types and found in virtually all biological fluids, have the potential to transform acute diagnostics as minimally invasive biomarkers. As key intercellular messengers and carriers of biological cargo, EVs reflect the physiological and pathological states of their parent cells. While EV research has largely focused on chronic diseases such as cancer and neurodegeneration, their role in acute pathologies remains under-investigated.</p><p><strong>Content: </strong>This review describes the current landscape of EVs in laboratory medicine, with a focus on their potential for acute and emergent conditions, including sepsis, stroke, traumatic brain injury, and myocardial infarction. We examine advances in EV isolation and characterization techniques and discuss the unique challenges of implementing these approaches in a clinical setting. In particular, we highlight emerging technologies that aim to address existing barriers, including lack of standardization, long processing times, and limited clinical scalability.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>By summarizing existing knowledge and identifying critical research gaps, this review intends to refocus attention toward EV applications for acute care. As EV-based diagnostics continue to advance, their successful integration into clinical work flows has the potential to significantly transform healthcare delivery, enabling real-time, personalized diagnostics and improving health outcomes across a wide range of settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":46361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145918870","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Nga Yeung Tang, Carmen Gherasim, Lee Schroeder, Hsuan-Chieh Liao, Qian Sun
Background: Bicarbonate concentration is widely used to assess acid-base disorders in patients, and the concentration can be directly measured or calculated. When discrepant results between measured bicarbonate (mHCO3-) and calculated bicarbonate (cHCO3-) are observed, it can lead to confusion among clinicians and potential for misdiagnosis. Here we assessed the agreement between cHCO3- from the Radiometer blood gas analyzer and mHCO3- from 3 different chemistry instruments.
Methods: Three institutions that measure bicarbonate using chemistry analyzers from 3 different manufacturers and derive bicarbonate on Radiometer blood gas analyzers participated in this study. De-identified patient data include plasma mHCO3- and blood gas cHCO3- results (arterial and venous) collected within +/- 20 min. Correlations and biases were determined.
Results: Deming regression analysis showed good correlations between cHCO3- and mHCO3-. Bland-Altman analysis revealed the greatest bias between Radiometer and Abbott Architect (-2.63 mmol/L), followed by Siemens Advia (0.49 mmol/L) and Beckman AU680 (-0.45 mmol/L).
Conclusions: This is the first study to compare cHCO3- from the Radiometer blood gas analyzer against mHCO3- results from multiple chemistry analyzers. Our results suggest that the Radiometer blood gas analyzer, Siemens Advia, and Beckman AU680 agree well with each other. However, bicarbonate results may be negatively biased when measured on the Abbott Architect compared with the other methods.
{"title":"Assessment of Instrument-Specific Variation between Measured and Calculated Bicarbonate.","authors":"Nga Yeung Tang, Carmen Gherasim, Lee Schroeder, Hsuan-Chieh Liao, Qian Sun","doi":"10.1093/jalm/jfaf201","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfaf201","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bicarbonate concentration is widely used to assess acid-base disorders in patients, and the concentration can be directly measured or calculated. When discrepant results between measured bicarbonate (mHCO3-) and calculated bicarbonate (cHCO3-) are observed, it can lead to confusion among clinicians and potential for misdiagnosis. Here we assessed the agreement between cHCO3- from the Radiometer blood gas analyzer and mHCO3- from 3 different chemistry instruments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three institutions that measure bicarbonate using chemistry analyzers from 3 different manufacturers and derive bicarbonate on Radiometer blood gas analyzers participated in this study. De-identified patient data include plasma mHCO3- and blood gas cHCO3- results (arterial and venous) collected within +/- 20 min. Correlations and biases were determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Deming regression analysis showed good correlations between cHCO3- and mHCO3-. Bland-Altman analysis revealed the greatest bias between Radiometer and Abbott Architect (-2.63 mmol/L), followed by Siemens Advia (0.49 mmol/L) and Beckman AU680 (-0.45 mmol/L).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first study to compare cHCO3- from the Radiometer blood gas analyzer against mHCO3- results from multiple chemistry analyzers. Our results suggest that the Radiometer blood gas analyzer, Siemens Advia, and Beckman AU680 agree well with each other. However, bicarbonate results may be negatively biased when measured on the Abbott Architect compared with the other methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":46361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145918912","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ersilia Bifulco, Kai Triebner, Francisco Gómez Real, Bénédicte Leynaert, Steinar Hustad
Background: Determination of steroid hormones by mass spectrometry (MS) offers several advantages over immunoassays. Modern MS instruments have high selectivity and sensitivity and permit measurements of several compounds at picomolar concentrations in one sample volume, which is advantageous when conducting biobank studies.
Methods: We developed a LC-MS/MS method for the determination of 17β-estradiol, 17α-ethinylestradiol, estrone, estrone 3-sulfate, estriol, progesterone, testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, aldosterone, cortisone, and cortisol in 300 μL human serum. Samples were subjected to robotized protein precipitation with acetonitrile and liquid-liquid extraction with ethyl acetate/heptane, and the aqueous and organic phases were used to determine conjugated and unconjugated steroids, respectively. The steroids were separated from isobars and compounds with similar mass (M + 2) on a C18 reversed phase column. Ammonium hydroxide was infused post-column to enhance ionization, and ions were measured in multiple reaction monitoring negative and positive mode.
Results: The lower limits of quantification for 17β-estradiol and estrone were 3.6 (0.98 pg/mL) and 2.1 pmol/L (0.57 pg/mL), respectively. For medium concentrations of steroid hormones, total CVs were in the range 2.3% to 10.5%, and accuracies were 97% to 109%. The method was validated in terms of linearity (r2 ≥ 0.9779) and assay recovery (83%-114%), and certified control sera were analyzed. Steroid profiles were obtained in 921 women with a mean age of 56 years (range 44-66 years) from the European Community Respiratory Health Survey.
Conclusions: We developed a selective and sensitive LC-MS/MS method for 11 steroids in human serum. It is suitable for biobank studies.
{"title":"A Sensitive Method for Quantitative Profiling of Estrogens, Progesterone, Androgens, and Corticosteroids in Human Serum by LC-MS/MS.","authors":"Ersilia Bifulco, Kai Triebner, Francisco Gómez Real, Bénédicte Leynaert, Steinar Hustad","doi":"10.1093/jalm/jfaf198","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfaf198","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Determination of steroid hormones by mass spectrometry (MS) offers several advantages over immunoassays. Modern MS instruments have high selectivity and sensitivity and permit measurements of several compounds at picomolar concentrations in one sample volume, which is advantageous when conducting biobank studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a LC-MS/MS method for the determination of 17β-estradiol, 17α-ethinylestradiol, estrone, estrone 3-sulfate, estriol, progesterone, testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, aldosterone, cortisone, and cortisol in 300 μL human serum. Samples were subjected to robotized protein precipitation with acetonitrile and liquid-liquid extraction with ethyl acetate/heptane, and the aqueous and organic phases were used to determine conjugated and unconjugated steroids, respectively. The steroids were separated from isobars and compounds with similar mass (M + 2) on a C18 reversed phase column. Ammonium hydroxide was infused post-column to enhance ionization, and ions were measured in multiple reaction monitoring negative and positive mode.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The lower limits of quantification for 17β-estradiol and estrone were 3.6 (0.98 pg/mL) and 2.1 pmol/L (0.57 pg/mL), respectively. For medium concentrations of steroid hormones, total CVs were in the range 2.3% to 10.5%, and accuracies were 97% to 109%. The method was validated in terms of linearity (r2 ≥ 0.9779) and assay recovery (83%-114%), and certified control sera were analyzed. Steroid profiles were obtained in 921 women with a mean age of 56 years (range 44-66 years) from the European Community Respiratory Health Survey.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We developed a selective and sensitive LC-MS/MS method for 11 steroids in human serum. It is suitable for biobank studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":46361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145918860","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Tyler Cooke, Craig R Soderquist, Mahesh M Mansukhani, Susan J Hsiao
Background: JAK2, CALR, and MPL mutations are defining features of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). Molecular testing for variants in these genes is standard of care in the diagnosis of MPNs. A high reimbursement denial rate led to review of ordering practices and test utilization to identify potential areas for optimization, education, or triage to improve laboratory stewardship.
Methods: MPN panel orders placed between January 1, 2023 and December 31, 2023 were analyzed by ordering provider, complete blood count (CBC) values, demographics, test results, and International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD10) code. Laboratory staff manually review orders prior to testing. Clinical appropriateness was defined as unexplained cytosis or atypical thrombosis.
Results: Orders for 257 unique patients were included for analysis. Most orders were placed by hematology/oncology providers (79.0%). Of orders, 72.8% had a cytosis-related ICD10 code, and 11.7% a thrombosis-related ICD10 code. MPN panel results were negative in 76.3% of patients and positive (pathogenic mutations in JAK2/CALR/MPL) in 13.2%. A χ2 test did not show a statistically significant association between ICD10 category and positive results. Of patients with positive results, 79.4% had thrombocytosis on CBC, but 70.6% had normal or low hemoglobin.
Conclusions: Orders for our institution's MPN panel are generally appropriate and placed correctly. Our findings do not support additional interventions or clinical decision support, utilizing features such as the patient's CBC values or ICD10 codes, as likely to be of significant benefit. The limited reimbursement remains challenging, but we will continue to engage stakeholders to advocate for continued access.
{"title":"Ordering Practices and Utilization of a Next-Generation Sequencing Panel for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.","authors":"Tyler Cooke, Craig R Soderquist, Mahesh M Mansukhani, Susan J Hsiao","doi":"10.1093/jalm/jfaf197","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfaf197","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>JAK2, CALR, and MPL mutations are defining features of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). Molecular testing for variants in these genes is standard of care in the diagnosis of MPNs. A high reimbursement denial rate led to review of ordering practices and test utilization to identify potential areas for optimization, education, or triage to improve laboratory stewardship.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MPN panel orders placed between January 1, 2023 and December 31, 2023 were analyzed by ordering provider, complete blood count (CBC) values, demographics, test results, and International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD10) code. Laboratory staff manually review orders prior to testing. Clinical appropriateness was defined as unexplained cytosis or atypical thrombosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Orders for 257 unique patients were included for analysis. Most orders were placed by hematology/oncology providers (79.0%). Of orders, 72.8% had a cytosis-related ICD10 code, and 11.7% a thrombosis-related ICD10 code. MPN panel results were negative in 76.3% of patients and positive (pathogenic mutations in JAK2/CALR/MPL) in 13.2%. A χ2 test did not show a statistically significant association between ICD10 category and positive results. Of patients with positive results, 79.4% had thrombocytosis on CBC, but 70.6% had normal or low hemoglobin.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Orders for our institution's MPN panel are generally appropriate and placed correctly. Our findings do not support additional interventions or clinical decision support, utilizing features such as the patient's CBC values or ICD10 codes, as likely to be of significant benefit. The limited reimbursement remains challenging, but we will continue to engage stakeholders to advocate for continued access.</p>","PeriodicalId":46361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145918878","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Rebekah Goldblatt, Florencia Monge, Cory Hansen, Melissa M Budelier
Background: Tacrolimus therapeutic drug monitoring is a routine and critical assay for managing transplant patients. Tacrolimus can be measured from whole blood samples via liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) or immunoassay (IA). LC-MS/MS provides accurate parent drug quantification with minimal metabolite interference but requires expensive analyzers, highly trained staff, and is often a very manual process. Immunoassays offer faster, simpler workflows, but historically have been prone to significant cross-reaction with the drug's metabolites or other therapeutic drugs, leading to a falsely elevated result. Newer immunoassays show promising improvements in specificity.
Methods: Using 73 residual patient samples, we compared our in-house LC-MS/MS tacrolimus assay to the Roche Elecsys® tacrolimus electrochemiluminescence immunoassay on the cobas® e801 analyzer. Comparative analysis was done with Deming regression and Bland-Altman comparison. Linearity, within-individual imprecision, and total imprecision post immunoassay implementation were also evaluated, along with changes and improvements to workflow and turnaround times (TAT).
Results: The Roche Elecsys tacrolimus assay correlated well with our LC-MS/MS method (Deming regression equation: y = 1.004x + 0.4848). The bias was 0.52 ng/mL (an average of 8.1%) as determined by Bland-Altman comparison. When switching to the immunoassay we observed a 42%-51% improvement in TAT across the median, 75th percentile, and 90th percentile.
Conclusions: We observed excellent correlation between the Roche Elecsys tacrolimus assay on an e801 analyzer vs our in-house LC-MS/MS assay, with good precision and linearity across reportable ranges. Changing from mass spectrometry to tacrolimus immunoassay substantially improved our TAT and workflow.
{"title":"Tacrolimus Assay Comparison: Analytical and Operational Considerations for Immunoassay vs Mass Spectrometry Testing in a High Volume Clinical Laboratory.","authors":"Rebekah Goldblatt, Florencia Monge, Cory Hansen, Melissa M Budelier","doi":"10.1093/jalm/jfaf199","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfaf199","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tacrolimus therapeutic drug monitoring is a routine and critical assay for managing transplant patients. Tacrolimus can be measured from whole blood samples via liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) or immunoassay (IA). LC-MS/MS provides accurate parent drug quantification with minimal metabolite interference but requires expensive analyzers, highly trained staff, and is often a very manual process. Immunoassays offer faster, simpler workflows, but historically have been prone to significant cross-reaction with the drug's metabolites or other therapeutic drugs, leading to a falsely elevated result. Newer immunoassays show promising improvements in specificity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using 73 residual patient samples, we compared our in-house LC-MS/MS tacrolimus assay to the Roche Elecsys® tacrolimus electrochemiluminescence immunoassay on the cobas® e801 analyzer. Comparative analysis was done with Deming regression and Bland-Altman comparison. Linearity, within-individual imprecision, and total imprecision post immunoassay implementation were also evaluated, along with changes and improvements to workflow and turnaround times (TAT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Roche Elecsys tacrolimus assay correlated well with our LC-MS/MS method (Deming regression equation: y = 1.004x + 0.4848). The bias was 0.52 ng/mL (an average of 8.1%) as determined by Bland-Altman comparison. When switching to the immunoassay we observed a 42%-51% improvement in TAT across the median, 75th percentile, and 90th percentile.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We observed excellent correlation between the Roche Elecsys tacrolimus assay on an e801 analyzer vs our in-house LC-MS/MS assay, with good precision and linearity across reportable ranges. Changing from mass spectrometry to tacrolimus immunoassay substantially improved our TAT and workflow.</p>","PeriodicalId":46361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145918924","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Maurizio Pasi, Ilaria Giardini, Eleonora Buscaglia, Azzurra Schicchi, Carlo A Locatelli, Andrea Giampreti, Mariapina Gallo, Riccardo Albertini, Pietro Papa, Antonella Valli
Background: The rise of synthetic cathinones (SC), and in particular 3,4-MDPHP (3,4-methylenedioxy-α-pyrrolidinohexanophenone), is a concerning health threat. This paper represents the most extensive case series on 3,4-MDPHP suspected intoxications to date, offering a detailed analysis of its impact.
Methods: This study presents the analytical findings for 108 hospitalized patients who tested positive for 3,4-MDPHP, out of a total of 465 subjects admitted for suspected new psychoactive substances (NPS) intoxication. Analyses were performed by GC-MS and LC-MS/MS. The potential cross-reactivity of 3,4-MDPHP with the Syva EMIT II Plus urine ecstasy immunoassay is also investigated.
Results: 3,4-MDPHP was detected in 56% of NPS positive cases. A wide range of 3,4-MDPHP concentrations was observed in both blood (1-257 ng/mL) and urine (2-32 250 ng/mL). 3,4-MDPHP was the sole detected substance in 73.1% of cases, while 26.9% involved co-consumption with other drugs of abuse, primarily cocaine. Investigations about 3,4-MDPHP cross-reactivity with Syva EMIT II Plus urine ecstasy demonstrated that unmodified 3,4-MDPHP does not trigger a positive result, but its metabolites seem to be involved in a positive cross-reaction.
Conclusion: This study confirms the high prevalence (108/465) of 3,4-MDPHP in NPS related intoxication cases in our cohort. It is essential for clinical laboratories and emergency departments to be aware of the potential cross-reactivity in ecstasy immunoassay, as this may lead to significant diagnostic errors and misinterpretation of results.
背景:合成卡西酮(SC)的兴起,特别是3,4- mdphp(3,4-亚甲二氧基-α-吡咯烷二己烯酮),是一个令人担忧的健康威胁。本文代表了迄今为止最广泛的3,4- mdphp疑似中毒病例系列,并提供了其影响的详细分析。方法:在465例疑似新型精神活性物质(NPS)中毒住院患者中,108例3,4- mdphp检测呈阳性。采用GC-MS和LC-MS/MS进行分析。我们还研究了3,4- mdphp与Syva EMIT II Plus尿狂喜免疫分析法的潜在交叉反应性。结果:56%的NPS阳性病例检出3,4- mdphp。在血液(1-257 ng/mL)和尿液(2-32 250 ng/mL)中均观察到3,4- mdphp浓度的大范围变化。在73.1%的病例中,3,4- mdphp是唯一检测到的物质,而26.9%的病例涉及与其他滥用药物(主要是可卡因)共同使用。对3,4- mdphp与Syva EMIT II Plus尿液摇头丸的交叉反应性的研究表明,未经修饰的3,4- mdphp不会引发阳性结果,但其代谢物似乎参与了阳性交叉反应。结论:本研究证实了我们队列中NPS相关中毒病例中3,4- mdphp的高患病率(108/465)。临床实验室和急诊科必须意识到摇头丸免疫测定中潜在的交叉反应性,因为这可能导致重大的诊断错误和对结果的误解。
{"title":"Prevalence of 3,4-Methylenedioxy-α-Pyrrolidinohexanophenone (3,4-MDPHP) in 465 Suspected Intoxication Cases and Cross-Reactivity Evaluation in an Ecstasy Immunoassay.","authors":"Maurizio Pasi, Ilaria Giardini, Eleonora Buscaglia, Azzurra Schicchi, Carlo A Locatelli, Andrea Giampreti, Mariapina Gallo, Riccardo Albertini, Pietro Papa, Antonella Valli","doi":"10.1093/jalm/jfaf165","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jalm/jfaf165","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The rise of synthetic cathinones (SC), and in particular 3,4-MDPHP (3,4-methylenedioxy-α-pyrrolidinohexanophenone), is a concerning health threat. This paper represents the most extensive case series on 3,4-MDPHP suspected intoxications to date, offering a detailed analysis of its impact.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study presents the analytical findings for 108 hospitalized patients who tested positive for 3,4-MDPHP, out of a total of 465 subjects admitted for suspected new psychoactive substances (NPS) intoxication. Analyses were performed by GC-MS and LC-MS/MS. The potential cross-reactivity of 3,4-MDPHP with the Syva EMIT II Plus urine ecstasy immunoassay is also investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>3,4-MDPHP was detected in 56% of NPS positive cases. A wide range of 3,4-MDPHP concentrations was observed in both blood (1-257 ng/mL) and urine (2-32 250 ng/mL). 3,4-MDPHP was the sole detected substance in 73.1% of cases, while 26.9% involved co-consumption with other drugs of abuse, primarily cocaine. Investigations about 3,4-MDPHP cross-reactivity with Syva EMIT II Plus urine ecstasy demonstrated that unmodified 3,4-MDPHP does not trigger a positive result, but its metabolites seem to be involved in a positive cross-reaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study confirms the high prevalence (108/465) of 3,4-MDPHP in NPS related intoxication cases in our cohort. It is essential for clinical laboratories and emergency departments to be aware of the potential cross-reactivity in ecstasy immunoassay, as this may lead to significant diagnostic errors and misinterpretation of results.</p>","PeriodicalId":46361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"61-72"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145507639","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}