The Role of Dominant Spiritual and Religious Coping Modality on Psychological Predictors Among Nursing Students.

IF 2 Q2 NURSING Journal of Holistic Nursing Pub Date : 2024-05-21 DOI:10.1177/08980101241255160
Mohammed Munther Al-Hammouri
{"title":"The Role of Dominant Spiritual and Religious Coping Modality on Psychological Predictors Among Nursing Students.","authors":"Mohammed Munther Al-Hammouri","doi":"10.1177/08980101241255160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> The current study aimed to examine the role of the dominant spiritual and religious coping modality on health-related variables and determinants, including stress overload, mindfulness, and impulsivity, among nursing students. <b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional design was used to achieve the study goal. The authors recruited 1199 nursing students. The results showed that the mean for positive spiritual and religious coping was higher compared to negative spiritual and religious coping. <b>Results:</b> In the current study, 73.3% of nursing students predominantly used positive spiritual and religious coping compared to 17.6% in the neutral group and 9.1% in the negative spiritual and religious coping group. Positive spiritual and religious coping was positively correlated with mindfulness and stress overload and negatively correlated with impulsivity. According to the ANOVA results, students with positive spiritual and religious coping tended to have a significantly higher stress overload, higher mindfulness, and lower impulsivity compared to the neutral and negative spiritual and coping groups. Negative spiritual and religious coping group significantly differed from the neutral groups only in terms of impulsivity. <b>Conclusion:</b> The current study's findings help nursing students by determining dominant spiritual and religious coping modalities and provide valuable information in directing counseling efforts. Results and implications were discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":51615,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Holistic Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Holistic Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08980101241255160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The current study aimed to examine the role of the dominant spiritual and religious coping modality on health-related variables and determinants, including stress overload, mindfulness, and impulsivity, among nursing students. Methods: A cross-sectional design was used to achieve the study goal. The authors recruited 1199 nursing students. The results showed that the mean for positive spiritual and religious coping was higher compared to negative spiritual and religious coping. Results: In the current study, 73.3% of nursing students predominantly used positive spiritual and religious coping compared to 17.6% in the neutral group and 9.1% in the negative spiritual and religious coping group. Positive spiritual and religious coping was positively correlated with mindfulness and stress overload and negatively correlated with impulsivity. According to the ANOVA results, students with positive spiritual and religious coping tended to have a significantly higher stress overload, higher mindfulness, and lower impulsivity compared to the neutral and negative spiritual and coping groups. Negative spiritual and religious coping group significantly differed from the neutral groups only in terms of impulsivity. Conclusion: The current study's findings help nursing students by determining dominant spiritual and religious coping modalities and provide valuable information in directing counseling efforts. Results and implications were discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主导精神和宗教应对方式对护理专业学生心理预测的作用。
目的:本研究旨在探讨主导的精神和宗教应对方式对护理专业学生健康相关变量和决定因素(包括压力超载、正念和冲动性)的作用。研究方法采用横断面设计来实现研究目标。作者招募了 1199 名护理专业学生。结果显示,积极的精神和宗教应对方式的平均值高于消极的精神和宗教应对方式。结果显示在本次研究中,73.3%的护理专业学生主要采用积极的精神和宗教应对方式,相比之下,中性组为 17.6%,消极的精神和宗教应对方式组为 9.1%。积极的精神和宗教应对与正念和压力超载呈正相关,与冲动呈负相关。方差分析结果显示,与中性和消极精神与宗教应对组相比,积极精神与宗教应对组的学生往往具有更高的压力超载、更高的正念和更低的冲动性。消极精神和宗教应对组仅在冲动性方面与中性组有显著差异。结论目前的研究结果有助于护理专业学生确定主要的精神和宗教应对方式,并为指导咨询工作提供有价值的信息。讨论了研究结果和意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Manuscripts are solicited that deal with the processes of knowledge development and application including research, concept analysis and theory development, practical applications of research and theory, clinical case studies and analysis, practice applications in general, educational approaches and evaluation, and aesthetic expressions of holistic knowledge. While the journal seeks to support work grounded in evidence, the editorial philosophy suggests that there are many diverse sources of “evidence” beyond the realm of what is called “empirical” and that many methods are appropriate for discovering evidence and generating knowledge.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Mindfulness Practices for Effectiveness of Stress and Burnout Reduction in Healthcare Staff. Innovative Complementary Cooling Intervention for Women's Multiple Sclerosis Symptoms: A Mixed-Methods Study. Corrigendum to "Forgiveness and Religiosity Among Nurses: A Correlational Descriptive Study". The Effect of Forgiveness and Resilience on Anxiety, Depression and Stress in Nursing Students. Effects of the Vitality Acupunch Exercise Program on Older Adults With Probable Sarcopenia: A Mixed Methods Pilot Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1