Mowing increased community stability in semiarid grasslands more than either fencing or grazing

IF 4.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecological Applications Pub Date : 2024-05-21 DOI:10.1002/eap.2985
Tianqi Zhao, Rongzhen Suo, Aklilu W. Alemu, Jiahua Zheng, Feng Zhang, Alan D. Iwaasa, Jianying Guo, Mengli Zhao, Bin Zhang
{"title":"Mowing increased community stability in semiarid grasslands more than either fencing or grazing","authors":"Tianqi Zhao,&nbsp;Rongzhen Suo,&nbsp;Aklilu W. Alemu,&nbsp;Jiahua Zheng,&nbsp;Feng Zhang,&nbsp;Alan D. Iwaasa,&nbsp;Jianying Guo,&nbsp;Mengli Zhao,&nbsp;Bin Zhang","doi":"10.1002/eap.2985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A substantial body of empirical evidence suggests that anthropogenic disturbance can affect the structure and function of grassland ecosystems. Despite this, few studies have elucidated the mechanisms through which grazing and mowing, the two most widespread land management practices, affect the stability of natural grassland communities. In this study, we draw upon 9 years of field data from natural grasslands in northern China to investigate the effects of gazing and mowing on community stability, specifically focusing on community aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP) and dominance, which are two major biodiversity mechanisms known to characterize community fluctuations. We found that both grazing and mowing reduced ANPP in comparison to areas enclosed by fencing. Grazing reduced community stability by increasing the likelihood of single-species dominance and decreasing the relative proportion of nondominant species. In contrast, mowing reduced the productivity of the dominant species but increased the productivity of nondominant species. As a consequence, mowing improved the overall community stability by increasing the stability of nondominant species. Our study provides novel insight into understanding of the relationship between community species fluctuation-stability, with implications for ecological research and ecosystem management in natural grasslands.</p>","PeriodicalId":55168,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Applications","volume":"34 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Applications","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.2985","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A substantial body of empirical evidence suggests that anthropogenic disturbance can affect the structure and function of grassland ecosystems. Despite this, few studies have elucidated the mechanisms through which grazing and mowing, the two most widespread land management practices, affect the stability of natural grassland communities. In this study, we draw upon 9 years of field data from natural grasslands in northern China to investigate the effects of gazing and mowing on community stability, specifically focusing on community aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP) and dominance, which are two major biodiversity mechanisms known to characterize community fluctuations. We found that both grazing and mowing reduced ANPP in comparison to areas enclosed by fencing. Grazing reduced community stability by increasing the likelihood of single-species dominance and decreasing the relative proportion of nondominant species. In contrast, mowing reduced the productivity of the dominant species but increased the productivity of nondominant species. As a consequence, mowing improved the overall community stability by increasing the stability of nondominant species. Our study provides novel insight into understanding of the relationship between community species fluctuation-stability, with implications for ecological research and ecosystem management in natural grasslands.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
割草比围栏或放牧更能提高半干旱草地群落的稳定性。
大量经验证据表明,人为干扰会影响草原生态系统的结构和功能。尽管如此,很少有研究阐明放牧和割草这两种最普遍的土地管理方式影响天然草地群落稳定性的机制。在本研究中,我们利用来自中国北方天然草地的 9 年野外数据,研究了放牧和刈割对群落稳定性的影响,特别关注群落地上净初级生产力(ANPP)和优势度,这是已知的群落波动的两大生物多样性机制。我们发现,与用围栏围起来的区域相比,放牧和除草都降低了净初级生产力。放牧增加了单一物种优势的可能性,降低了非优势物种的相对比例,从而降低了群落的稳定性。相反,割草降低了优势物种的生产力,但提高了非优势物种的生产力。因此,除草提高了非优势物种的稳定性,从而改善了群落的整体稳定性。我们的研究为理解群落物种波动与稳定性之间的关系提供了新的视角,对天然草地的生态研究和生态系统管理具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Applications
Ecological Applications 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
2.00%
发文量
268
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The pages of Ecological Applications are open to research and discussion papers that integrate ecological science and concepts with their application and implications. Of special interest are papers that develop the basic scientific principles on which environmental decision-making should rest, and those that discuss the application of ecological concepts to environmental problem solving, policy, and management. Papers that deal explicitly with policy matters are welcome. Interdisciplinary approaches are encouraged, as are short communications on emerging environmental challenges.
期刊最新文献
Integrating landscape ecology into generic surveillance plans for bark‐ and wood‐boring beetles Disentangling the effects of multifunctional forestry practices on the abundances of birds and their invertebrate prey Disentangling the contributions of density dependence and independence to population growth rates Plant interactions, climate, and the reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) interdependently shape vegetation in northern Finland. Trait-based approaches to restoration ecology: Synthesizing insights from diverse systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1