A Competition of Critics in Human Decision-Making.

Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.) Pub Date : 2021-08-12 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.5334/cpsy.64
Enkhzaya Enkhtaivan, Joel Nishimura, Cheng Ly, Amy L Cochran
{"title":"A Competition of Critics in Human Decision-Making.","authors":"Enkhzaya Enkhtaivan, Joel Nishimura, Cheng Ly, Amy L Cochran","doi":"10.5334/cpsy.64","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent experiments and theories of human decision-making suggest positive and negative errors are processed and encoded differently by serotonin and dopamine, with serotonin possibly serving to oppose dopamine and protect against risky decisions. We introduce a temporal difference (TD) model of human decision-making to account for these features. Our model involves two critics, an optimistic learning system and a pessimistic learning system, whose predictions are integrated in time to control how potential decisions compete to be selected. Our model predicts that human decision-making can be decomposed along two dimensions: the degree to which the individual is sensitive to (1) risk and (2) uncertainty. In addition, we demonstrate that the model can learn about the mean and standard deviation of rewards, and provide information about reaction time despite not modeling these variables directly. Lastly, we simulate a recent experiment to show how updates of the two learning systems could relate to dopamine and serotonin transients, thereby providing a mathematical formalism to serotonin's hypothesized role as an opponent to dopamine. This new model should be useful for future experiments on human decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":72664,"journal":{"name":"Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11104313/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/cpsy.64","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent experiments and theories of human decision-making suggest positive and negative errors are processed and encoded differently by serotonin and dopamine, with serotonin possibly serving to oppose dopamine and protect against risky decisions. We introduce a temporal difference (TD) model of human decision-making to account for these features. Our model involves two critics, an optimistic learning system and a pessimistic learning system, whose predictions are integrated in time to control how potential decisions compete to be selected. Our model predicts that human decision-making can be decomposed along two dimensions: the degree to which the individual is sensitive to (1) risk and (2) uncertainty. In addition, we demonstrate that the model can learn about the mean and standard deviation of rewards, and provide information about reaction time despite not modeling these variables directly. Lastly, we simulate a recent experiment to show how updates of the two learning systems could relate to dopamine and serotonin transients, thereby providing a mathematical formalism to serotonin's hypothesized role as an opponent to dopamine. This new model should be useful for future experiments on human decision-making.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人类决策中的批评家之争。
最近的实验和人类决策理论表明,血清素和多巴胺对积极和消极错误的处理和编码方式是不同的,血清素可能起到对抗多巴胺和防止风险决策的作用。我们引入了人类决策的时间差(TD)模型来解释这些特征。我们的模型涉及两个批评者,一个乐观的学习系统和一个悲观的学习系统,它们的预测在时间上进行整合,以控制潜在决策的竞争选择方式。我们的模型预测,人类决策可以从两个维度进行分解:个人对(1)风险和(2)不确定性的敏感程度。此外,我们还证明了该模型可以了解奖励的平均值和标准偏差,并提供有关反应时间的信息,尽管这些变量并不是直接建模的。最后,我们模拟了最近的一项实验,展示了两个学习系统的更新如何与多巴胺和血清素瞬态相关联,从而为血清素作为多巴胺对手的假设角色提供了一个数学形式主义。这一新模型将有助于未来的人类决策实验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
(Mal)adaptive Mentalizing in the Cognitive Hierarchy, and Its Link to Paranoia. Decision-Making, Pro-variance Biases and Mood-Related Traits. Enhancing Within-Person Estimation of Neurocognition and the Prediction of Externalizing Behaviors in Adolescents. Updating Prospective Self-Efficacy Beliefs About Cardiac Interoception in Anorexia Nervosa: An Experimental and Computational Study. Temporal Dynamics of Uncertainty Cause Anxiety and Avoidance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1