Reputation and recency: How do aggressive short sellers assess ESG-Related Information?

IF 10.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Business Research Pub Date : 2024-05-21 DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114718
Stephen E. Christophe , Jim Hsieh , Hun Lee
{"title":"Reputation and recency: How do aggressive short sellers assess ESG-Related Information?","authors":"Stephen E. Christophe ,&nbsp;Jim Hsieh ,&nbsp;Hun Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We examine the effects of short- and long-term as well as positive and negative ESG reputation of companies on aggressive short selling. Our results suggest that aggressive short selling is most associated with recent and negative ESG-related news. These findings are consistent with the recency and negativity biases of reputation literature. When we separate the companies into positive and negative long-term ESG reputation, we find that aggressive short selling occurs most frequently in the subgroup of companies that possess a long-term, negative ESG reputation jointly with recent, negative ESG-related information. Interestingly, however, we do not find that the aggressive short selling of this subgroup is followed by significantly negative abnormal returns. Instead, we find significant negative abnormal returns following aggressive shorting of the subgroup with a long-term, positive ESG reputation coupled with recent, negative ESG-related information, which is consistent with the expectancy violation theory of reputation literature.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296324002224","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We examine the effects of short- and long-term as well as positive and negative ESG reputation of companies on aggressive short selling. Our results suggest that aggressive short selling is most associated with recent and negative ESG-related news. These findings are consistent with the recency and negativity biases of reputation literature. When we separate the companies into positive and negative long-term ESG reputation, we find that aggressive short selling occurs most frequently in the subgroup of companies that possess a long-term, negative ESG reputation jointly with recent, negative ESG-related information. Interestingly, however, we do not find that the aggressive short selling of this subgroup is followed by significantly negative abnormal returns. Instead, we find significant negative abnormal returns following aggressive shorting of the subgroup with a long-term, positive ESG reputation coupled with recent, negative ESG-related information, which is consistent with the expectancy violation theory of reputation literature.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
声誉和重复性:激进卖空者如何评估 ESG 相关信息?
我们研究了公司的短期和长期声誉以及正面和负面 ESG 声誉对激进卖空的影响。我们的研究结果表明,激进卖空与近期和负面的 ESG 相关新闻关系最大。这些发现与声誉文献中的近期和负面偏差相一致。当我们将公司分为长期负面 ESG 声誉和长期负面 ESG 声誉时,我们发现,在长期负面 ESG 声誉与近期负面 ESG 相关信息共同作用的公司子群中,激进卖空最为频繁。然而,有趣的是,我们并没有发现这个子群的激进卖空行为会带来显著的负异常回报。相反,我们发现,在激进卖空具有长期、积极的 ESG 声誉和近期、消极的 ESG 相关信息的亚组公司后,会出现显著的消极异常回报,这与声誉文献中的预期违反理论相一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
期刊最新文献
Energy Performance of Building Refurbishments: Predictive and Prescriptive AI-based Machine Learning Approaches Digital transformation along the supply chain: Spillover effects from vertical partnerships Bridging consumption and work: The effects of thoughts about different types of purchases on job-related motivations A meta-analytic investigation into the pay-it-forward phenomenon: The roles of individualism-collectivism and social distance The more, the better: The influence of overconfident CEOs on their firms’ digital orientation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1