Nature, urban, or treadmill: How walking environment impacts state body satisfaction and appreciation and the role of body sanctification

IF 5.2 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Body Image Pub Date : 2024-05-22 DOI:10.1016/j.bodyim.2024.101711
Jennifer A. Harriger, Janet P. Trammell, Elizabeth J. Krumrei-Mancuso
{"title":"Nature, urban, or treadmill: How walking environment impacts state body satisfaction and appreciation and the role of body sanctification","authors":"Jennifer A. Harriger,&nbsp;Janet P. Trammell,&nbsp;Elizabeth J. Krumrei-Mancuso","doi":"10.1016/j.bodyim.2024.101711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study examined the effects of walking environments on state body satisfaction and state body appreciation and the potential moderating role of body sanctification. Participants included 189 undergraduates from a private Christian University in the Southwestern US, randomly assigned to walk for 20-minutes in a natural, outdoors built, or indoors built environment. Participants completed measures of state body satisfaction and state body appreciation prior to and immediately following the walk. Those who walked in nature experienced increased state body satisfaction but not state body appreciation compared to those who walked in an indoor built environment. Theistic sanctification of the body was associated with greater state body appreciation and moderated the relationship between walking location and body appreciation. Participants who sanctified their bodies to a greater extent experienced increases in body appreciation when walking in a natural environment compared to an indoor built environment relative to those who were lower in body sanctification. Nontheistic sanctification of the body was associated with higher state body satisfaction and state body appreciation but did not moderate links between walking location and these outcomes. Overall, walking in nature is beneficial to body satisfaction and theistic sanctification of the body may bolster these effects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48312,"journal":{"name":"Body Image","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Body Image","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1740144524000330","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined the effects of walking environments on state body satisfaction and state body appreciation and the potential moderating role of body sanctification. Participants included 189 undergraduates from a private Christian University in the Southwestern US, randomly assigned to walk for 20-minutes in a natural, outdoors built, or indoors built environment. Participants completed measures of state body satisfaction and state body appreciation prior to and immediately following the walk. Those who walked in nature experienced increased state body satisfaction but not state body appreciation compared to those who walked in an indoor built environment. Theistic sanctification of the body was associated with greater state body appreciation and moderated the relationship between walking location and body appreciation. Participants who sanctified their bodies to a greater extent experienced increases in body appreciation when walking in a natural environment compared to an indoor built environment relative to those who were lower in body sanctification. Nontheistic sanctification of the body was associated with higher state body satisfaction and state body appreciation but did not moderate links between walking location and these outcomes. Overall, walking in nature is beneficial to body satisfaction and theistic sanctification of the body may bolster these effects.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自然、城市或跑步机:行走环境如何影响身体状态的满意度和欣赏度,以及身体圣化的作用
本研究探讨了步行环境对身体状态满意度和身体状态欣赏度的影响,以及身体圣化的潜在调节作用。参与者包括来自美国西南部一所私立基督教大学的 189 名本科生,他们被随机分配在自然环境、室外建筑环境或室内建筑环境中步行 20 分钟。参与者在步行前和步行后立即完成身体状态满意度和身体状态欣赏度的测量。与在室内建筑环境中行走的人相比,在自然环境中行走的人身体状态满意度有所提高,但身体状态欣赏度没有提高。对身体的有神论圣化与更高的身体状态欣赏有关,并调节了散步地点与身体欣赏之间的关系。与那些身体神圣化程度较低的人相比,那些身体神圣化程度较高的参与者在自然环境中行走时,身体欣赏程度会比在室内建筑环境中行走时更高。非神论的身体神圣化与较高的身体状态满意度和身体状态欣赏度有关,但并不影响行走地点与这些结果之间的联系。总的来说,在大自然中行走有利于提高身体满意度,而有神论的身体圣化可能会增强这些效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Body Image
Body Image Multiple-
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
28.80%
发文量
174
期刊介绍: Body Image is an international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality, scientific articles on body image and human physical appearance. Body Image is a multi-faceted concept that refers to persons perceptions and attitudes about their own body, particularly but not exclusively its appearance. The journal invites contributions from a broad range of disciplines-psychological science, other social and behavioral sciences, and medical and health sciences. The journal publishes original research articles, brief research reports, theoretical and review papers, and science-based practitioner reports of interest. Dissertation abstracts are also published online, and the journal gives an annual award for the best doctoral dissertation in this field.
期刊最新文献
Does TikTok contribute to eating disorders? A comparison of the TikTok algorithms belonging to individuals with eating disorders versus healthy controls Reported higher general early-life bullying victimization is uniquely associated with more eating pathology and poor psychosocial well-being in Chinese sexual minority men “Make sure that everybody feels there is a space for them”: Understanding and promoting appearance inclusivity at university. State gender variability and body satisfaction among sexual minority men Body image facets as predictors of muscularity-oriented disordered eating in women: Findings from a prospective study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1