Do multi-channel use and online engagement matter for critical literacy and information verification behaviors? Comprehensive comparisons of six generations from before 1954 (war generation) to generation Z (after 1997)

IF 8.9 1区 教育学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computers & Education Pub Date : 2024-05-19 DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105078
Soyoung Park , Jiwon Kim
{"title":"Do multi-channel use and online engagement matter for critical literacy and information verification behaviors? Comprehensive comparisons of six generations from before 1954 (war generation) to generation Z (after 1997)","authors":"Soyoung Park ,&nbsp;Jiwon Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The prevalence of multi-channel information consumption, which involves the simultaneous engagement with multiple information sources across various platforms, underscores the urgent need for research on its effects as it profoundly influences how individuals seek, evaluate, and interact with information, ultimately shaping their information-related choices and behaviors. Using an innovative empirical method to extract a set of latent groups based on individuals' multi-channel practices, the study examined the role of channel plurality relative to how people evaluate and consume information online. Importantly, this research examined how conditions of the critical literacy and practices can be configured to benefit six distinct generational groups, ranging from the youngest generation group (1990s) to the oldest generation (1950s). Based on results of a nationally representative survey (<em>N</em> = 10,032), the current research demonstrated how individuals’ channel plurality contributes to their critical literacy and information verification behaviors. Finally, this study identified differences in information practices manifested in six generational groups. In the end, this study bridged two streams of research, new media literacy and the digital divide, and discussed how different educational and regulatory approaches can be made to encourage critical information consumption in an increasingly digitized network environment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10568,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Education","volume":"218 ","pages":"Article 105078"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131524000927","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The prevalence of multi-channel information consumption, which involves the simultaneous engagement with multiple information sources across various platforms, underscores the urgent need for research on its effects as it profoundly influences how individuals seek, evaluate, and interact with information, ultimately shaping their information-related choices and behaviors. Using an innovative empirical method to extract a set of latent groups based on individuals' multi-channel practices, the study examined the role of channel plurality relative to how people evaluate and consume information online. Importantly, this research examined how conditions of the critical literacy and practices can be configured to benefit six distinct generational groups, ranging from the youngest generation group (1990s) to the oldest generation (1950s). Based on results of a nationally representative survey (N = 10,032), the current research demonstrated how individuals’ channel plurality contributes to their critical literacy and information verification behaviors. Finally, this study identified differences in information practices manifested in six generational groups. In the end, this study bridged two streams of research, new media literacy and the digital divide, and discussed how different educational and regulatory approaches can be made to encourage critical information consumption in an increasingly digitized network environment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多渠道使用和在线参与对关键素养和信息验证行为有影响吗?从 1954 年之前(战争年代)到 Z 世代(1997 年之后)六代人的综合比较
多渠道信息消费是指在各种平台上同时接触多种信息来源,它的盛行凸显了对其影响进行研究的迫切性,因为它深刻地影响了个人如何寻求、评估信息并与之互动,最终塑造了他们与信息相关的选择和行为。本研究采用创新的实证方法,根据个人的多渠道实践提取出一组潜在群体,研究了渠道多元化在人们如何评估和消费网络信息方面的作用。重要的是,这项研究考察了如何配置关键素养和实践条件,使从最年轻的一代(20 世纪 90 年代)到最年长的一代(20 世纪 50 年代)等六个不同的世代群体受益。根据一项具有全国代表性的调查结果(N = 10,032),目前的研究表明了个人渠道的多元化是如何促进其批判性素养和信息验证行为的。最后,本研究发现了六个世代群体在信息实践方面的差异。最后,本研究在新媒体素养和数字鸿沟这两个研究领域之间架起了一座桥梁,并讨论了在日益数字化的网络环境中,如何采取不同的教育和监管方法来鼓励批判性信息消费。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Education
Computers & Education 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
27.10
自引率
5.80%
发文量
204
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Computers & Education seeks to advance understanding of how digital technology can improve education by publishing high-quality research that expands both theory and practice. The journal welcomes research papers exploring the pedagogical applications of digital technology, with a focus broad enough to appeal to the wider education community.
期刊最新文献
Personalization in educational gamification: Learners with different trait competitiveness benefit differently from rankings on leaderboards Reducing interpretative ambiguity in an educational environment with ChatGPT Editorial Board “Storytelling and educational robotics: A scoping review (2004–2024)” Advancing a Practical Inquiry Model with multi-perspective role-playing to foster critical thinking behavior in e-book reading
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1