Impact of water quality and operational factors on microcystin removal by powdered activated carbon

Matthew T. Alexander, Thomas E. Waters, Morgan McNeely, Thomas F. Speth, Nicholas R. Dugan
{"title":"Impact of water quality and operational factors on microcystin removal by powdered activated carbon","authors":"Matthew T. Alexander,&nbsp;Thomas E. Waters,&nbsp;Morgan McNeely,&nbsp;Thomas F. Speth,&nbsp;Nicholas R. Dugan","doi":"10.1002/aws2.1372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>The feasibility of using a 2<sup>6-1</sup> fractional factorial design to screen the relative importance of six water quality and operational factors in the removal of microcystin-LR (MC-LR) by powdered activated carbon (PAC) was evaluated through jar testing. The factors were: PAC type, PAC dose, total organic carbon (TOC) concentration, turbidity, alum dose, and timing of PAC versus coagulant application. Follow-up tests were performed to examine the interaction of PAC dose and TOC concentrations. All MC-LR analyses were performed by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS). The top three effect magnitudes were the same by ELISA and LC/MS/MS:PAC dose &gt; PAC type &gt; PAC application time. Correlation coefficients between removals estimated by ELISA and LC/MS/MS were &gt;0.9 (<i>p</i> « .05). With both methods, the effects of PAC type and dose were found to be markedly larger than the other factors. The follow-up tests indicated a greater impact of PAC dose at higher natural organic matter concentrations. Factorial designs are not commonly used to plan drinking water jar test experiments. The results generated in this study were plausible with respect to the existing body of adsorption knowledge, thus helping to demonstrate the feasibility of the factorial approach.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":101301,"journal":{"name":"AWWA water science","volume":"6 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AWWA water science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aws2.1372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The feasibility of using a 26-1 fractional factorial design to screen the relative importance of six water quality and operational factors in the removal of microcystin-LR (MC-LR) by powdered activated carbon (PAC) was evaluated through jar testing. The factors were: PAC type, PAC dose, total organic carbon (TOC) concentration, turbidity, alum dose, and timing of PAC versus coagulant application. Follow-up tests were performed to examine the interaction of PAC dose and TOC concentrations. All MC-LR analyses were performed by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS). The top three effect magnitudes were the same by ELISA and LC/MS/MS:PAC dose > PAC type > PAC application time. Correlation coefficients between removals estimated by ELISA and LC/MS/MS were >0.9 (p « .05). With both methods, the effects of PAC type and dose were found to be markedly larger than the other factors. The follow-up tests indicated a greater impact of PAC dose at higher natural organic matter concentrations. Factorial designs are not commonly used to plan drinking water jar test experiments. The results generated in this study were plausible with respect to the existing body of adsorption knowledge, thus helping to demonstrate the feasibility of the factorial approach.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
水质和操作因素对粉末活性炭去除微囊藻毒素的影响
通过罐式试验评估了采用 26-1 分因子设计筛选粉末活性炭(PAC)去除微囊藻毒素-LR(MC-LR)的六个水质和操作因素的相对重要性的可行性。这些因素是PAC 类型、PAC 剂量、总有机碳 (TOC) 浓度、浊度、明矾剂量以及 PAC 与混凝剂的施用时间。还进行了后续测试,以检验 PAC 剂量和 TOC 浓度之间的相互作用。所有 MC-LR 分析均采用酶联免疫吸附测定法 (ELISA) 和液相色谱-串联质谱法 (LC/MS/MS)。通过酶联免疫吸附测定法和液相色谱/串联质谱法,前三个效应量级相同:PAC 剂量> PAC 类型> PAC 施用时间。ELISA 和 LC/MS/MS 估算的清除率之间的相关系数为 0.9(p " .05)。通过这两种方法发现,PAC 类型和剂量的影响明显大于其他因素。后续测试表明,在天然有机物浓度较高时,PAC 剂量的影响更大。因子设计并不常用于规划饮用水罐测试实验。从现有的吸附知识来看,本研究得出的结果是可信的,因此有助于证明因子法的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lithium in drinking water: Review of chemistry, analytical methods, and treatment technologies A pilot-scale study of potable reuse impacts on surface water treatment 2015 United States Public Health Service optimal fluoride level adherence and operation among adjusting water systems in 40 states: 2016–2021 Drinking water buffer intensity simulator (BIS): Development and practical simulations The role of genus Bacillus in biodegradation of microcystins: Implications for the removal of cyanotoxins from tropical freshwaters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1