SCOUT® Radar Localization at Time of Breast Biopsy.

IF 2 Q3 ONCOLOGY Journal of Breast Imaging Pub Date : 2024-07-30 DOI:10.1093/jbi/wbae024
Brittany Z Dashevsky, Mohamed S Muneer, Meng Hao, Tie Liang, Irene L Wapnir, Steven P Poplack
{"title":"SCOUT® Radar Localization at Time of Breast Biopsy.","authors":"Brittany Z Dashevsky, Mohamed S Muneer, Meng Hao, Tie Liang, Irene L Wapnir, Steven P Poplack","doi":"10.1093/jbi/wbae024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluate surgical utilization of SCOUT reflectors placed at breast biopsy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consent was waived for this retrospective IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant study. Breast biopsy examinations that reported the term \"SCOUT\" between January 2021 and June 2022 were identified using an institutional search engine. Cases were included if a SCOUT reflector was placed at time of breast biopsy and excluded if lesion pathology was already known. Analysis was performed at the lesion level. A multivariate-regression analysis evaluated 6 variables with potential impact on SCOUT utilization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred twenty-one lesions in 112 patients met inclusion criteria. Biopsy yielded 93% (113/121) malignant, 3% (4/121) elevated risk, 2% (2/121) benign-discordant, and 2% (2/121) benign-concordant results. Two cases lost to follow-up were excluded. SCOUT reflectors were utilized for lumpectomy (58%, 69/119 lesions) and excisional biopsy (6%, 7/119 lesions). SCOUTs were not utilized due to mastectomy (23%, 27/119), subsequent wire localization (2%, 2/119), and nonsurgical cases (12%, 14/119). Reflector placement utilization was 52% higher for findings less than 3.5 cm in size (P <.001), 33% higher in patients without prior treated breast cancer (P = .012), and 19% higher in patients with no suspicious ipsilateral lymph node (P = .048).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SCOUT reflector placement at time of biopsy was utilized for surgery 64% (76/119) of the time, although most (98%, 119/121) biopsies were malignant, elevated risk, or benign-discordant. Factors increasing reflector utilization include smaller lesion size, no suspicious ipsilateral lymph node, and no prior treated breast cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":43134,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Breast Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Breast Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbi/wbae024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Evaluate surgical utilization of SCOUT reflectors placed at breast biopsy.

Methods: Consent was waived for this retrospective IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant study. Breast biopsy examinations that reported the term "SCOUT" between January 2021 and June 2022 were identified using an institutional search engine. Cases were included if a SCOUT reflector was placed at time of breast biopsy and excluded if lesion pathology was already known. Analysis was performed at the lesion level. A multivariate-regression analysis evaluated 6 variables with potential impact on SCOUT utilization.

Results: One hundred twenty-one lesions in 112 patients met inclusion criteria. Biopsy yielded 93% (113/121) malignant, 3% (4/121) elevated risk, 2% (2/121) benign-discordant, and 2% (2/121) benign-concordant results. Two cases lost to follow-up were excluded. SCOUT reflectors were utilized for lumpectomy (58%, 69/119 lesions) and excisional biopsy (6%, 7/119 lesions). SCOUTs were not utilized due to mastectomy (23%, 27/119), subsequent wire localization (2%, 2/119), and nonsurgical cases (12%, 14/119). Reflector placement utilization was 52% higher for findings less than 3.5 cm in size (P <.001), 33% higher in patients without prior treated breast cancer (P = .012), and 19% higher in patients with no suspicious ipsilateral lymph node (P = .048).

Conclusion: SCOUT reflector placement at time of biopsy was utilized for surgery 64% (76/119) of the time, although most (98%, 119/121) biopsies were malignant, elevated risk, or benign-discordant. Factors increasing reflector utilization include smaller lesion size, no suspicious ipsilateral lymph node, and no prior treated breast cancer.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乳腺活检时的 SCOUT® 雷达定位。
目的评估乳腺活检时放置的 SCOUT 反射器的手术使用情况:这项经 IRB 批准、符合 HIPAA 标准的回顾性研究无需征得同意。使用机构搜索引擎确定了 2021 年 1 月至 2022 年 6 月期间报告过 "SCOUT "一词的乳腺活检检查。如果乳腺活检时放置了 SCOUT 反射器,则纳入病例;如果病变病理已明确,则排除病例。分析在病灶层面进行。多变量回归分析评估了可能影响 SCOUT 使用情况的 6 个变量:112名患者的121处病变符合纳入标准。活检结果显示,93%(113/121)为恶性,3%(4/121)为高危,2%(2/121)为良性不一致,2%(2/121)为良性一致。两例失去随访的病例被排除在外。肿块切除术(58%,69/119 个病灶)和切除活检(6%,7/119 个病灶)均使用了 SCOUT 反射器。未使用 SCOUT 的原因包括乳房切除术(23%,27/119)、后续导线定位(2%,2/119)和非手术病例(12%,14/119)。尺寸小于 3.5 厘米的检查结果使用反射器的比例高出 52%(P,结论):尽管大多数(98%,119/121)活检为恶性、高危或良恶不一,但活检时使用 SCOUT 反射镜的比例为 64%(76/119)。增加使用反射器的因素包括:病灶大小较小、同侧无可疑淋巴结、之前未治疗过乳腺癌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
81
期刊最新文献
Performance of Abbreviated Breast MRI in High-Risk Patients in a Tertiary Care Academic Medical Center. Developing a Career as a Clinician-Educator in Breast Imaging. Unknown Case: Non-mass Enhancement on Baseline MRI. Developing Financial Acumen as a Breast Imaging Radiologist. Methodological Considerations in Evaluating Breast Cancer Screening Studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1