Physician awareness of fluid volume administered with intravenous antibiotics - a structured interview-based study.

IF 1.9 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-23 DOI:10.15441/ceem.24.219
Jaleh Aghaie, Marianne Lisby, Marie Kristine Jessen
{"title":"Physician awareness of fluid volume administered with intravenous antibiotics - a structured interview-based study.","authors":"Jaleh Aghaie, Marianne Lisby, Marie Kristine Jessen","doi":"10.15441/ceem.24.219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Fluids administered as drug diluents with intravenous (IV) medicine constitute a substantial fraction of fluids in inpatients. Are physicians aware of fluid volumes administered with IV antibiotics for patients with suspected infections? Does addressing this lead to adjustments in 24-hour fluid administration/antibiotics?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional interview-based study was conducted in three emergency departments. Physicians were interviewed after prescribing around-the-clock IV antibiotics for ³24 hours to patients with suspected infection. A structured interview guide assessed the physicians' awareness, considerations, and practices when prescribing IV antibiotics. The 24-hour antibiotic fluid volume was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We interviewed 100 physicians. The 24-hour fluid volume administered with IV antibiotics was 400mL (interquartile range: 300-400). Totally, 53% of physicians (n=53) were unaware of the fluid volume administered with IV antibiotics. 76% (n=76) did not account for the antibiotic fluid volume in the 24-hour fluid administration. 96% (n=96) indicated that they would not adjust prescribed fluids after receiving information about 24-hour antibiotic fluid volume administered for their specific patient; no comorbidities associated with fluid intolerance was primary reason for not adjusting prescribed fluids/antibiotics. 79% (n=79) opted for visibility of fluid volumes administered with IV antibiotics in the medical record.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The majority of physicians were unaware of fluid volumes administered as a drug diluent with IV antibiotics. The majority chose not to make post-prescribing adjustments to their planned fluid administration; they regarded their patient as fluid tolerable. The physicians opted for visibility of fluid volumes administered as diluents during the prescribing process.</p>","PeriodicalId":10325,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.24.219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Fluids administered as drug diluents with intravenous (IV) medicine constitute a substantial fraction of fluids in inpatients. Are physicians aware of fluid volumes administered with IV antibiotics for patients with suspected infections? Does addressing this lead to adjustments in 24-hour fluid administration/antibiotics?

Methods: This cross-sectional interview-based study was conducted in three emergency departments. Physicians were interviewed after prescribing around-the-clock IV antibiotics for ³24 hours to patients with suspected infection. A structured interview guide assessed the physicians' awareness, considerations, and practices when prescribing IV antibiotics. The 24-hour antibiotic fluid volume was calculated.

Results: We interviewed 100 physicians. The 24-hour fluid volume administered with IV antibiotics was 400mL (interquartile range: 300-400). Totally, 53% of physicians (n=53) were unaware of the fluid volume administered with IV antibiotics. 76% (n=76) did not account for the antibiotic fluid volume in the 24-hour fluid administration. 96% (n=96) indicated that they would not adjust prescribed fluids after receiving information about 24-hour antibiotic fluid volume administered for their specific patient; no comorbidities associated with fluid intolerance was primary reason for not adjusting prescribed fluids/antibiotics. 79% (n=79) opted for visibility of fluid volumes administered with IV antibiotics in the medical record.

Conclusion: The majority of physicians were unaware of fluid volumes administered as a drug diluent with IV antibiotics. The majority chose not to make post-prescribing adjustments to their planned fluid administration; they regarded their patient as fluid tolerable. The physicians opted for visibility of fluid volumes administered as diluents during the prescribing process.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医生对静脉注射抗生素时输液量的认识--基于结构化访谈的研究。
目的:作为静脉注射药物稀释剂的液体占住院患者液体的很大一部分。医生是否了解疑似感染患者静脉注射抗生素时的输液量?解决这一问题是否会导致 24 小时输液量/抗生素用量的调整?这项基于访谈的横断面研究在三个急诊科进行。在对疑似感染患者开具 24 小时全天候静脉注射抗生素处方后,对医生进行了访谈。结构化访谈指南评估了医生在开具静脉注射抗生素处方时的意识、注意事项和做法。结果:我们对 100 名医生进行了访谈。静脉注射抗生素的 24 小时输液量为 400 毫升(四分位数间距:300-400)。53%的医生(人数=53)不知道静脉注射抗生素的输液量。76%(n=76)的医生在 24 小时输液中未计算抗生素输液量。96%(n=96)的患者表示,他们在收到针对特定患者的 24 小时抗生素输液量信息后不会调整处方液体;不调整处方液体/抗生素的主要原因是没有与液体不耐受相关的合并症。79%(n=79)的医生选择在病历中注明静脉注射抗生素的输液量:结论:大多数医生不知道静脉注射抗生素时作为药物稀释剂的输液量。大多数医生选择在开处方后不对输液计划进行调整;他们认为患者可以耐受输液。医生们选择在处方过程中对作为稀释剂的输液量进行记录。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
59
期刊最新文献
Academic articles with public health perspectives as a potential tool for Korean doctors in addressing health issues. Common carotid arterial pseudoaneurysm mistaken for peritonsillar abscess. Derivation and validation of a simple prognostic risk score to predict short-term mortality in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema: SABIHA Score. Impact of Concomitant Injuries on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Isolated versus Non-Isolated Traumatic Brain Injury. Performance of transesophageal echocardiography probe at temperature monitoring during simulated hypothermia and rewarming.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1