Molecular Subtypes of High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer across Racial Groups and Gene Expression Platforms.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0113
Natalie R Davidson, Mollie E Barnard, Ariel A Hippen, Amy Campbell, Courtney E Johnson, Gregory P Way, Brian K Dalley, Andrew Berchuck, Lucas A Salas, Lauren C Peres, Jeffrey R Marks, Joellen M Schildkraut, Casey S Greene, Jennifer A Doherty
{"title":"Molecular Subtypes of High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer across Racial Groups and Gene Expression Platforms.","authors":"Natalie R Davidson, Mollie E Barnard, Ariel A Hippen, Amy Campbell, Courtney E Johnson, Gregory P Way, Brian K Dalley, Andrew Berchuck, Lucas A Salas, Lauren C Peres, Jeffrey R Marks, Joellen M Schildkraut, Casey S Greene, Jennifer A Doherty","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) gene expression subtypes are associated with differential survival. We characterized HGSC gene expression in Black individuals and considered whether gene expression differences by self-identified race may contribute to poorer HGSC survival among Black versus White individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included newly generated RNA sequencing data from Black and White individuals and array-based genotyping data from four existing studies of White and Japanese individuals. We used K-means clustering, a method with no predefined number of clusters or dataset-specific features, to assign subtypes. Cluster- and dataset-specific gene expression patterns were summarized by moderated t-scores. We compared cluster-specific gene expression patterns across datasets by calculating the correlation between the summarized vectors of moderated t-scores. After mapping to The Cancer Genome Atlas-derived HGSC subtypes, we used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate subtype-specific survival by dataset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cluster-specific gene expression was similar across gene expression platforms and racial groups. Comparing the Black population with the White and Japanese populations, the immunoreactive subtype was more common (39% vs. 23%-28%) and the differentiated subtype was less common (7% vs. 22%-31%). Patterns of subtype-specific survival were similar between the Black and White populations with RNA sequencing data; compared with mesenchymal cases, the risk of death was similar for proliferative and differentiated cases and suggestively lower for immunoreactive cases [Black population HR = 0.79 (0.55, 1.13); White population HR = 0.86 (0.62, 1.19)].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the prevalence of HGSC subtypes varied by race, subtype-specific survival was similar.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>HGSC subtypes can be consistently assigned across platforms and self-identified racial groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":9458,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"1114-1125"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11294000/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0113","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: High-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) gene expression subtypes are associated with differential survival. We characterized HGSC gene expression in Black individuals and considered whether gene expression differences by self-identified race may contribute to poorer HGSC survival among Black versus White individuals.

Methods: We included newly generated RNA sequencing data from Black and White individuals and array-based genotyping data from four existing studies of White and Japanese individuals. We used K-means clustering, a method with no predefined number of clusters or dataset-specific features, to assign subtypes. Cluster- and dataset-specific gene expression patterns were summarized by moderated t-scores. We compared cluster-specific gene expression patterns across datasets by calculating the correlation between the summarized vectors of moderated t-scores. After mapping to The Cancer Genome Atlas-derived HGSC subtypes, we used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate subtype-specific survival by dataset.

Results: Cluster-specific gene expression was similar across gene expression platforms and racial groups. Comparing the Black population with the White and Japanese populations, the immunoreactive subtype was more common (39% vs. 23%-28%) and the differentiated subtype was less common (7% vs. 22%-31%). Patterns of subtype-specific survival were similar between the Black and White populations with RNA sequencing data; compared with mesenchymal cases, the risk of death was similar for proliferative and differentiated cases and suggestively lower for immunoreactive cases [Black population HR = 0.79 (0.55, 1.13); White population HR = 0.86 (0.62, 1.19)].

Conclusions: Although the prevalence of HGSC subtypes varied by race, subtype-specific survival was similar.

Impact: HGSC subtypes can be consistently assigned across platforms and self-identified racial groups.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跨种族群体和基因表达平台的高级别浆液性卵巢癌分子亚型。
背景:高级别浆液性癌(HGSC)基因表达亚型与不同的生存率有关。我们描述了黑人的 HGSC 基因表达,并考虑了自我认同种族的基因表达差异是否会导致黑人的 HGSC 存活率低于白人:我们纳入了新生成的黑人和白人的 RNA-Seq 数据,以及现有的四项白人和日本人研究中基于阵列的基因分型数据。我们使用 K-均值聚类(一种不预先设定聚类数目或数据集特定特征的方法)来划分亚型。聚类和数据集特异性基因表达模式通过调节的 t score 进行总结。我们通过计算经调节的 t 分数汇总向量之间的相关性,比较不同数据集的群集特异性基因表达模式。在映射到癌症基因组图谱(TCGA)得出的HGSC亚型后,我们使用Cox比例危险模型按数据集估算亚型特异性生存率:不同基因表达平台和不同种族群体的簇特异性基因表达相似。黑人与白人和日本人相比,免疫反应亚型更常见(39%对23%-28%),分化亚型较少见(7%对22%-31%)。有RNA-Seq数据的黑人和白人人群的亚型特异性生存模式相似;与间质型病例相比,增殖型和分化型病例的死亡风险相似,而免疫反应型病例的死亡风险明显较低(黑人人群HR=0.79 [0.55, 1.13],白人人群HR=0.86 [0.62, 1.19]):影响:HGSC亚型可在不同平台和自我认同的种族群体中一致分配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.60%
发文量
538
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention publishes original peer-reviewed, population-based research on cancer etiology, prevention, surveillance, and survivorship. The following topics are of special interest: descriptive, analytical, and molecular epidemiology; biomarkers including assay development, validation, and application; chemoprevention and other types of prevention research in the context of descriptive and observational studies; the role of behavioral factors in cancer etiology and prevention; survivorship studies; risk factors; implementation science and cancer care delivery; and the science of cancer health disparities. Besides welcoming manuscripts that address individual subjects in any of the relevant disciplines, CEBP editors encourage the submission of manuscripts with a transdisciplinary approach.
期刊最新文献
Urinary Levels of Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals and Breast Density in Young Women. Evaluating Efficacy of Cervical HPV-HR DNA Testing as Alternative to PET/CT Imaging for Posttreatment Cancer Surveillance: Retrospective Proof-of-Concept Study. Food Insecurity and Clinical Biomarkers of Inflammation among Cancer Survivors in the All of Us Research Program. Highly Sensitive DNA Testing of Fusobacterium nucleatum in Colorectal Tumors. Rurality of Residence and Distance to Clinic Are Risk Factors for Non-engagement in Childhood Cancer Survivor Care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1