首页 > 最新文献

Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention最新文献

英文 中文
Neighborhood Disadvantage and Prostate Tumor Aggressiveness among African American and European American Men 非裔美国人和欧裔美国人男性的邻里劣势与前列腺肿瘤侵袭性
IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-24-0450
Joseph Boyle, Jessica Yau, Jimmie L. Slade, Derrick A. Butts, Jessica Wimbush, Jong Y. Park, Arif Hussain, Eberechukwu Onukwugha, Cheryl L. Knott, David C. Wheeler, Kathryn Hughes Barry
Background: Studies have identified associations between neighborhood disadvantage (ND), which is more likely to affect African American (AA) individuals, and aggressive prostate cancer. Thus, ND may contribute to prostate cancer disparities. However, it is unknown what ND components drive aggressive disease and whether associations vary by race. Methods: We evaluated associations between aggressive prostate cancer and four ND metrics—Area Deprivation Index (ADI), validated Bayesian Neighborhood Deprivation Index (NDI), racial isolation (RI) index, and historical redlining, and whether these factors interacted with race, among men with prostate cancer treated at the University of Maryland Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center (2004–2021). Results: We included 1,458 men (698 European American and 760 AA). AA men were more likely to experience ND. In adjusted models, the ADI, RI, and redlining were significantly associated with aggressive versus nonaggressive prostate cancer overall [ADI, OR for one SD increase = 1.14, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.00–1.30; RI, OR = 1.27, CI, 1.07–1.51; redlining, OR = 1.77; CI, 1.23–2.56] and among AA men. The NDI was associated with aggressive prostate cancer among AA men (OR = 1.32, 95% credible interval: 1.13–1.57); percent in poverty received the largest importance weight. The ADI (P heterogeneity = 0.002) and NDI (exceedance probability heterogeneity = 98.1%) significantly interacted with race, such that associations were significantly stronger for AA men. Conclusions: We identified novel significant positive associations for racial segregation and historical redlining with aggressive prostate cancer and significant interactions between ND indices and race. Impact: Findings inform specific ND components that are associated with aggressive prostate cancer and suggest the ND effect is stronger for AA men, which has implications for interventions to reduce disparities.
背景:研究发现,邻里劣势(ND)与侵袭性前列腺癌之间存在关联,而邻里劣势更有可能影响非裔美国人(AA)。因此,ND 可能会导致前列腺癌的差异。然而,ND 的哪些因素会导致侵袭性疾病,以及不同种族之间的关联是否存在差异,目前还不得而知。研究方法我们评估了在马里兰大学格林鲍姆综合癌症中心接受治疗的前列腺癌男性患者(2004-2021 年)中,侵袭性前列腺癌与四个 ND 指标--地区贫困指数 (ADI)、贝叶斯验证邻里贫困指数 (NDI)、种族隔离 (RI) 指数和历史红线之间的关联,以及这些因素是否与种族相互影响。研究结果我们纳入了 1,458 名男性(698 名欧洲裔美国人和 760 名 AA)。AA 族男性更有可能出现 ND。在调整后的模型中,ADI、RI 和 Redlining 与侵袭性前列腺癌和非侵袭性前列腺癌有显著相关性 [ADI,增加一个 SD 的 OR = 1.14,95% 置信区间 (CI),1.00-1.30;RI,OR = 1.27,CI,1.07-1.51;redlining,OR = 1.77;CI,1.23-2.56],在 AA 族男性中也是如此。在 AA 族男性中,NDI 与侵袭性前列腺癌相关(OR = 1.32,95% 可信区间:1.13-1.57);贫困百分比的重要性权重最大。ADI(P异质性=0.002)和NDI(超出概率异质性=98.1%)与种族有显著的交互作用,因此AA男性的相关性明显更强。结论:我们发现种族隔离和历史红线与侵袭性前列腺癌之间存在新的显著正相关,而且 ND 指数与种族之间存在显著的交互作用。影响:研究结果揭示了与侵袭性前列腺癌相关的特定 ND 成分,并表明 AA 族男性的 ND 效应更强,这对减少差异的干预措施具有重要意义。
{"title":"Neighborhood Disadvantage and Prostate Tumor Aggressiveness among African American and European American Men","authors":"Joseph Boyle, Jessica Yau, Jimmie L. Slade, Derrick A. Butts, Jessica Wimbush, Jong Y. Park, Arif Hussain, Eberechukwu Onukwugha, Cheryl L. Knott, David C. Wheeler, Kathryn Hughes Barry","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.epi-24-0450","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-24-0450","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Studies have identified associations between neighborhood disadvantage (ND), which is more likely to affect African American (AA) individuals, and aggressive prostate cancer. Thus, ND may contribute to prostate cancer disparities. However, it is unknown what ND components drive aggressive disease and whether associations vary by race. Methods: We evaluated associations between aggressive prostate cancer and four ND metrics—Area Deprivation Index (ADI), validated Bayesian Neighborhood Deprivation Index (NDI), racial isolation (RI) index, and historical redlining, and whether these factors interacted with race, among men with prostate cancer treated at the University of Maryland Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center (2004–2021). Results: We included 1,458 men (698 European American and 760 AA). AA men were more likely to experience ND. In adjusted models, the ADI, RI, and redlining were significantly associated with aggressive versus nonaggressive prostate cancer overall [ADI, OR for one SD increase = 1.14, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.00–1.30; RI, OR = 1.27, CI, 1.07–1.51; redlining, OR = 1.77; CI, 1.23–2.56] and among AA men. The NDI was associated with aggressive prostate cancer among AA men (OR = 1.32, 95% credible interval: 1.13–1.57); percent in poverty received the largest importance weight. The ADI (P heterogeneity = 0.002) and NDI (exceedance probability heterogeneity = 98.1%) significantly interacted with race, such that associations were significantly stronger for AA men. Conclusions: We identified novel significant positive associations for racial segregation and historical redlining with aggressive prostate cancer and significant interactions between ND indices and race. Impact: Findings inform specific ND components that are associated with aggressive prostate cancer and suggest the ND effect is stronger for AA men, which has implications for interventions to reduce disparities.","PeriodicalId":9458,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142200142","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Development of a breast cancer risk prediction model integrating monogenic, polygenic, and epidemiologic risk 开发整合单基因、多基因和流行病学风险的乳腺癌风险预测模型
IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-24-0594
Sarah S. Kalia, Nicholas J. Boddicker, Siddhartha Yadav, Hongyan Huang, Jie Na, Chunling Hu, Christine B. Ambrosone, Song Yao, Christopher A. Haiman, Fei Chen, Esther M. John, Allison W. Kurian, Boya Guo, Sara Lindström, Paul Auer, James V. Lacey, Susan L. Neuhausen, Maria Elena. Martinez, Dale P. Sandler, Katie M. O'Brien, Jack A. Taylor, Lauren R. Teras, James M. Hodge, Adriana Lori, Clara Bodelon, Amy Trentham-Dietz, Elizabeth S. Burnside, Celine M. Vachon, Stacey J. Winham, David E. Goldgar, Susan M. Domchek, Katherine L. Nathanson, Jeffrey N. Weitzel, Fergus J. Couch, Peter Kraft
Background: Breast cancer has been associated with monogenic, polygenic, and epidemiologic (clinical, reproductive and lifestyle) risk factors, but studies evaluating the combined effects of these factors have been limited. Methods: We extended previous work in breast cancer risk modeling, incorporating pathogenic variants (PV) in six breast cancer predisposition genes and a 105-SNP polygenic risk score (PRS), to include an epidemiologic risk score (ERS) in a sample of non-Hispanic White women drawn from prospective cohorts and population-based case-control studies, with 23,518 cases and 22,832 controls, from the Cancer Risk Estimates Related to Susceptibility (CARRIERS) Consortium. Results: The model predicts 4.4-fold higher risk of breast cancer for postmenopausal women with no predisposition PV and median PRS, but with the highest versus lowest ERS. Overall, women with CHEK2 PVs had >20% lifetime risk of breast cancer. However, 15.6% of women with CHEK2 PVs and a family history of breast cancer, and 45.1% of women with CHEK2 PVs but without a family history of breast cancer, had low (<20%) predicted lifetime risk and thus were below the threshold for MRI screening. CHEK2 PV carriers at the 10th percentile of the joint distribution of ERS and PRS, without a family history of breast cancer, had a predicted lifetime risk similar to the general population. Conclusions: These results illustrate that an ERS, alone and combined with the PRS, can contribute to clinically relevant risk stratification. Impact: Integrating monogenic, polygenic, and epidemiologic risk factors in breast cancer risk prediction models may inform personalized screening and prevention efforts.
背景:乳腺癌与单基因、多基因和流行病学(临床、生殖和生活方式)风险因素有关,但评估这些因素综合影响的研究还很有限。研究方法我们扩展了以前的乳腺癌风险建模工作,将六个乳腺癌易感基因中的致病变异体(PV)和 105-SNP 多基因风险评分(PRS)纳入其中,并将流行病学风险评分(ERS)纳入癌症风险评估易感性(CARRIERS)联盟从前瞻性队列和基于人群的病例对照研究中抽取的非西班牙裔白人女性样本中,其中有 23,518 例病例和 22,832 例对照。研究结果该模型预测绝经后妇女罹患乳腺癌的风险比无易感性PV和中位PRS的妇女高4.4倍,但ERS最高与最低。总体而言,具有 CHEK2 PV 的妇女一生中患乳腺癌的风险为 >20% 。然而,在有乳腺癌家族史的CHEK2 PV女性中,有15.6%的人有乳腺癌家族史;在有乳腺癌家族史的CHEK2 PV女性中,有45.1%的人没有乳腺癌家族史,她们的预测终生乳腺癌风险较低(<20%),因此低于磁共振成像筛查的阈值。处于ERS和PRS联合分布第10百分位的CHEK2 PV携带者,如果没有乳腺癌家族史,其预测终生风险与普通人群相似。结论:这些结果表明,ERS(单独或与 PRS 结合)有助于临床相关的风险分层。影响:在乳腺癌风险预测模型中整合单基因、多基因和流行病学风险因素可为个性化筛查和预防工作提供依据。
{"title":"Development of a breast cancer risk prediction model integrating monogenic, polygenic, and epidemiologic risk","authors":"Sarah S. Kalia, Nicholas J. Boddicker, Siddhartha Yadav, Hongyan Huang, Jie Na, Chunling Hu, Christine B. Ambrosone, Song Yao, Christopher A. Haiman, Fei Chen, Esther M. John, Allison W. Kurian, Boya Guo, Sara Lindström, Paul Auer, James V. Lacey, Susan L. Neuhausen, Maria Elena. Martinez, Dale P. Sandler, Katie M. O'Brien, Jack A. Taylor, Lauren R. Teras, James M. Hodge, Adriana Lori, Clara Bodelon, Amy Trentham-Dietz, Elizabeth S. Burnside, Celine M. Vachon, Stacey J. Winham, David E. Goldgar, Susan M. Domchek, Katherine L. Nathanson, Jeffrey N. Weitzel, Fergus J. Couch, Peter Kraft","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.epi-24-0594","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-24-0594","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Breast cancer has been associated with monogenic, polygenic, and epidemiologic (clinical, reproductive and lifestyle) risk factors, but studies evaluating the combined effects of these factors have been limited. Methods: We extended previous work in breast cancer risk modeling, incorporating pathogenic variants (PV) in six breast cancer predisposition genes and a 105-SNP polygenic risk score (PRS), to include an epidemiologic risk score (ERS) in a sample of non-Hispanic White women drawn from prospective cohorts and population-based case-control studies, with 23,518 cases and 22,832 controls, from the Cancer Risk Estimates Related to Susceptibility (CARRIERS) Consortium. Results: The model predicts 4.4-fold higher risk of breast cancer for postmenopausal women with no predisposition PV and median PRS, but with the highest versus lowest ERS. Overall, women with CHEK2 PVs had >20% lifetime risk of breast cancer. However, 15.6% of women with CHEK2 PVs and a family history of breast cancer, and 45.1% of women with CHEK2 PVs but without a family history of breast cancer, had low (<20%) predicted lifetime risk and thus were below the threshold for MRI screening. CHEK2 PV carriers at the 10th percentile of the joint distribution of ERS and PRS, without a family history of breast cancer, had a predicted lifetime risk similar to the general population. Conclusions: These results illustrate that an ERS, alone and combined with the PRS, can contribute to clinically relevant risk stratification. Impact: Integrating monogenic, polygenic, and epidemiologic risk factors in breast cancer risk prediction models may inform personalized screening and prevention efforts.","PeriodicalId":9458,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142225754","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Recalibrating the Genetics and Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer Consortium (GECCO) Environmental Risk Score for Use in US Veterans 重新校准用于美国退伍军人的结直肠癌遗传与流行病学联合会(GECCO)环境风险评分
IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-24-0791
April R. Williams, Thomas S. Redding, Brian A. Sullivan, Robin N. Baidya, Belinda Ear, Kelly Cho, Kerry L. Ivey, Christina D. Williams, Jason A. Dominitz, David Lieberman, Elizabeth R. Hauser
Background: Risk for colorectal cancer (CRC) may accumulate through multiple environmental factors. Understanding their effects, along with genetics, age and family history, could allow improvements in clinical decisions for screening protocols. We aimed to extend previous work by recalibrating an environmental risk score (e-Score) for CRC among a sample of US Veteran participants of the Million Veteran Program (MVP). Methods: Demographic, lifestyle, and CRC data from 2011-2022 were abstracted from survey responses and health records of 227,504 male MVP participants. Weighting for each environmental factor’s effect size was recalculated using VA training data to create a recalibrated e-Score. This recalibrated score was compared with the original weighted e-Score in a validation sample of 113,752 (n cases=590). Nested multiple logistic regression models tested associations between quintiles for recalibrated and original e-Scores. Likelihood Ratio Tests were used to compare model performance. Results: Age (p<0.0001), education (p<0.0001), diabetes (p<0.0001), physical activity (p<0.0001), smoking (p<0.0001), NSAID use (p<0.0001), calcium (p=0.015), folate (p=0.020), and fruit consumption (p=0.019) were significantly different between CRC case and control groups. In the validation sample, the recalibrated e-Score model significantly improved the base model performance (p<0.001), but the original e-Score model did not (p=0.07). The recalibrated e-Score model quintile 5 was associated with significantly higher odds for CRC compared with quintile 1 (Q5 vs Q1: 1.79, 95% CI: 1.38-2.33). Conclusions: Multiple environmental factors, and the recalibrated e-Score quintiles were significantly associated with CRC cases. Impact: A recalibrated, Veteran-specific e-Score could be used to help personalize CRC screening and prevention strategies.
背景:患结直肠癌(CRC)的风险可能是由多种环境因素累积而成的。了解这些因素以及遗传、年龄和家族史的影响,可以改进筛查方案的临床决策。我们的目的是通过重新校准百万退伍军人计划(MVP)美国退伍军人参与者样本中的 CRC 环境风险评分(e-Score)来扩展之前的工作。方法:从 227,504 名 MVP 男性参与者的调查回复和健康记录中抽取了 2011-2022 年的人口统计学、生活方式和 CRC 数据。利用退伍军人事务部的培训数据重新计算了每个环境因素效应大小的权重,以创建一个重新校准的 e-Score。在 113,752 个验证样本(n 个病例=590)中,将重新校准后的得分与原始加权 e-Score 进行比较。嵌套的多元逻辑回归模型测试了重新校准后的 e-Score 和原始 e-Score 的五分位数之间的关联。使用似然比检验比较模型的性能。结果年龄(p<0.0001)、教育程度(p<0.0001)、糖尿病(p<0.0001)、体力活动(p<0.0001)、吸烟(p<0.0001)、使用非甾体抗炎药(p<0.0001)、钙(p=0.015)、叶酸(p=0.020)和水果摄入量(p=0.019)在 CRC 病例组和对照组之间存在显著差异。在验证样本中,重新校准的 e-Score 模型明显改善了基础模型的性能(p<0.001),但原始 e-Score 模型没有改善(p=0.07)。重新校准后的 e-Score 模型五分位数 5 与五分位数 1 相比,患 CRC 的几率明显更高(Q5 vs Q1:1.79,95% CI:1.38-2.33)。结论多种环境因素和重新校准的 e-Score 五分位数与 CRC 病例显著相关。影响:重新校准的退伍军人特异性 e-Score 可用于帮助制定个性化的 CRC 筛查和预防策略。
{"title":"Recalibrating the Genetics and Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer Consortium (GECCO) Environmental Risk Score for Use in US Veterans","authors":"April R. Williams, Thomas S. Redding, Brian A. Sullivan, Robin N. Baidya, Belinda Ear, Kelly Cho, Kerry L. Ivey, Christina D. Williams, Jason A. Dominitz, David Lieberman, Elizabeth R. Hauser","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.epi-24-0791","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-24-0791","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Risk for colorectal cancer (CRC) may accumulate through multiple environmental factors. Understanding their effects, along with genetics, age and family history, could allow improvements in clinical decisions for screening protocols. We aimed to extend previous work by recalibrating an environmental risk score (e-Score) for CRC among a sample of US Veteran participants of the Million Veteran Program (MVP). Methods: Demographic, lifestyle, and CRC data from 2011-2022 were abstracted from survey responses and health records of 227,504 male MVP participants. Weighting for each environmental factor’s effect size was recalculated using VA training data to create a recalibrated e-Score. This recalibrated score was compared with the original weighted e-Score in a validation sample of 113,752 (n cases=590). Nested multiple logistic regression models tested associations between quintiles for recalibrated and original e-Scores. Likelihood Ratio Tests were used to compare model performance. Results: Age (p<0.0001), education (p<0.0001), diabetes (p<0.0001), physical activity (p<0.0001), smoking (p<0.0001), NSAID use (p<0.0001), calcium (p=0.015), folate (p=0.020), and fruit consumption (p=0.019) were significantly different between CRC case and control groups. In the validation sample, the recalibrated e-Score model significantly improved the base model performance (p<0.001), but the original e-Score model did not (p=0.07). The recalibrated e-Score model quintile 5 was associated with significantly higher odds for CRC compared with quintile 1 (Q5 vs Q1: 1.79, 95% CI: 1.38-2.33). Conclusions: Multiple environmental factors, and the recalibrated e-Score quintiles were significantly associated with CRC cases. Impact: A recalibrated, Veteran-specific e-Score could be used to help personalize CRC screening and prevention strategies.","PeriodicalId":9458,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142225730","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The University of North Carolina Cancer Survivorship Cohort: A resource for collaborative survivorship research. 北卡罗来纳大学癌症幸存者队列:幸存者合作研究资源。
IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0794
Chelsea Anderson, Jeannette T Bensen, Emma H Allott, Patricia V Basta, Debra E Irwin, Adrian Gerstel, Laura Farnan, Hung-Jui Tan, Erin E Kent, Tzy-Mey Kuo, Christopher D Baggett, Andrew F Olshan, H Shelton Earp, Hazel B Nichols

Background: Rapid growth in the number of U.S. cancer survivors drives the need for ongoing research efforts to improve outcomes and experiences after cancer. Here we describe the University of North Carolina (UNC) Cancer Survivorship Cohort, a medical center-based cohort of adults with cancer that integrates medical record-abstracted cancer information, patient-reported outcomes, and biologic specimens.

Methods: Participants ages 18+ were recruited from UNC oncology clinics between April 2010 and August 2016. After enrollment, participants completed questionnaires on a range of topics including demographics, health history, health care access and utilization, quality of life, and symptoms. Blood samples and tumor tissue specimens were collected and processed by study staff, and cancer characteristics and other clinical data were abstracted from electronic medical records. Participants consented to recontact for future studies and linkage of their data with other data resources.

Results: In total, 3,999 participants with a cancer diagnosis were enrolled in the cohort. The most common cancer types among those enrolled included breast (N=866), uterine (N=458), colorectal (N=300), prostate (N=296), and head and neck (N=248). Blood specimens were collected for 3,027 (76%). Additional participants without cancer (N=1,299) were also enrolled, and the majority (62%) provided biospecimen samples.

Conclusions: We encourage wide collaboration with investigators across institutions seeking to advance research in cancer survivorship. Procedures are in place to support proposals for use of existing or linked data and for proposals that require participant recontact or analysis of biospecimens.

Impact: The UNC Cancer Survivorship Cohort is a unique resource for cancer survivorship research.

背景:美国癌症幸存者人数的快速增长促使我们需要不断开展研究工作,以改善癌症的治疗效果和经历。我们在此介绍北卡罗来纳大学(UNC)癌症幸存者队列(Cancer Survivorship Cohort),这是一个以医疗中心为基础的成年癌症患者队列,整合了癌症病历摘要信息、患者报告的结果和生物标本:方法: 2010 年 4 月至 2016 年 8 月期间,从联合国大学肿瘤诊所招募了 18 岁以上的参与者。注册后,参与者填写了一系列主题的调查问卷,包括人口统计学、健康史、医疗保健的获取和利用、生活质量和症状。研究人员收集并处理血液样本和肿瘤组织标本,并从电子病历中摘录癌症特征和其他临床数据。参与者同意在今后的研究中与他们再次联系,并将他们的数据与其他数据资源联系起来:共有 3999 名确诊癌症的参与者加入了该群组。最常见的癌症类型包括乳腺癌(866 例)、子宫癌(458 例)、结直肠癌(300 例)、前列腺癌(296 例)以及头颈部癌症(248 例)。采集了 3027 人(76%)的血液标本。此外,还招募了其他未患癌症的参与者(1299 人),其中大多数(62%)提供了生物样本:我们鼓励与各机构的研究人员广泛合作,共同推进癌症幸存者研究。我们制定了相关程序,以支持使用现有数据或链接数据的提案,以及需要重新联系参与者或分析生物样本的提案:UNC 癌症幸存者队列是癌症幸存者研究的独特资源。
{"title":"The University of North Carolina Cancer Survivorship Cohort: A resource for collaborative survivorship research.","authors":"Chelsea Anderson, Jeannette T Bensen, Emma H Allott, Patricia V Basta, Debra E Irwin, Adrian Gerstel, Laura Farnan, Hung-Jui Tan, Erin E Kent, Tzy-Mey Kuo, Christopher D Baggett, Andrew F Olshan, H Shelton Earp, Hazel B Nichols","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0794","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0794","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rapid growth in the number of U.S. cancer survivors drives the need for ongoing research efforts to improve outcomes and experiences after cancer. Here we describe the University of North Carolina (UNC) Cancer Survivorship Cohort, a medical center-based cohort of adults with cancer that integrates medical record-abstracted cancer information, patient-reported outcomes, and biologic specimens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants ages 18+ were recruited from UNC oncology clinics between April 2010 and August 2016. After enrollment, participants completed questionnaires on a range of topics including demographics, health history, health care access and utilization, quality of life, and symptoms. Blood samples and tumor tissue specimens were collected and processed by study staff, and cancer characteristics and other clinical data were abstracted from electronic medical records. Participants consented to recontact for future studies and linkage of their data with other data resources.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 3,999 participants with a cancer diagnosis were enrolled in the cohort. The most common cancer types among those enrolled included breast (N=866), uterine (N=458), colorectal (N=300), prostate (N=296), and head and neck (N=248). Blood specimens were collected for 3,027 (76%). Additional participants without cancer (N=1,299) were also enrolled, and the majority (62%) provided biospecimen samples.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We encourage wide collaboration with investigators across institutions seeking to advance research in cancer survivorship. Procedures are in place to support proposals for use of existing or linked data and for proposals that require participant recontact or analysis of biospecimens.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>The UNC Cancer Survivorship Cohort is a unique resource for cancer survivorship research.</p>","PeriodicalId":9458,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142139387","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cancer Screening, Knowledge, and Fatalism Among Chinese, Korean, and South Asian Residents of New York City. 纽约市华裔、韩裔和南亚裔居民的癌症筛查、知识和致命率。
IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0399
Isabel Inez Curro, Chloe A Teasdale, Laura C Wyatt, Victoria Foster, Yousra Yusuf, Sonia Sifuentes, Perla Chebli, Julie A Kranick, Simona C Kwon, Chau Trinh-Shevrin, Madison N LeCroy

Background: Asian New York City (NYC) residents have the lowest cancer screening uptake across race and ethnicity. Few studies have examined screening differences across Asian ethnic subgroups in NYC.

Methods: Cross-sectional survey data were analyzed using multivariable logistic and multinomial regression analyses. Differences among Chinese, Korean, and South Asian adults in breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer (CRC) screening uptake; breast and CRC screening knowledge; and cancer fatalism were examined. Associations between breast and CRC screening knowledge and their uptake were also assessed along with associations between cancer fatalism and breast, cervical, and CRC screening uptake.

Results: Korean women reported 0.52 (95%CI: 0.31, 0.89) times lower odds of Pap test uptake compared to Chinese women; South Asian adults had 0.43 (95%CI: 0.24, 0.79) times lower odds of CRC screening uptake compared to Chinese adults. Korean adults reported 1.80 (95%CI: 1.26, 2.58) times higher odds of knowing the correct age to begin having mammograms compared to Chinese adults; and South Asian adults had 0.67 (95%CI: 0.47, 0.96) times lower odds of knowing the correct age to begin CRC screening compared to Chinese adults. Korean adults had 0.37 (95%CI: 0.27, 0.53) times lower odds of reporting cancer fatalism compared to Chinese adults.

Conclusions: Low cancer screening uptake among Asian American adults, low screening knowledge, and high cancer fatalism were found. Cancer screening uptake, knowledge, and fatalism varied by ethnic subgroup.

Impact: Findings indicate the need for ethnic-specific cultural and linguistic tailoring for future cancer screening interventions.

背景:纽约市亚裔居民的癌症筛查率在所有种族和族裔中最低。很少有研究对纽约市亚裔亚群的筛查差异进行研究:方法:采用多变量逻辑分析和多项式回归分析对横断面调查数据进行了分析。研究了华裔、韩裔和南亚裔成年人在乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌(CRC)筛查率、乳腺癌和 CRC 筛查知识以及癌症宿命论方面的差异。此外,还评估了乳腺癌和结直肠癌筛查知识与筛查率之间的关系,以及癌症宿命论与乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查率之间的关系:与中国妇女相比,韩国妇女接受巴氏试验的几率要低 0.52(95%CI:0.31,0.89)倍;与中国成年人相比,南亚成年人接受 CRC 筛查的几率要低 0.43(95%CI:0.24,0.79)倍。与中国成年人相比,韩国成年人知道开始进行乳房 X 光检查的正确年龄的几率要高出 1.80(95%CI:1.26,2.58)倍;与中国成年人相比,南亚成年人知道开始进行 CRC 筛查的正确年龄的几率要低 0.67(95%CI:0.47,0.96)倍。与中国成年人相比,韩国成年人报告癌症致命性的几率要低0.37(95%CI:0.27,0.53)倍:结论:研究发现,亚裔美国成年人的癌症筛查率低、筛查知识水平低、癌症致死率高。癌症筛查率、筛查知识和宿命论因种族亚群而异:影响:研究结果表明,未来的癌症筛查干预措施需要针对特定种族的文化和语言进行调整。
{"title":"Cancer Screening, Knowledge, and Fatalism Among Chinese, Korean, and South Asian Residents of New York City.","authors":"Isabel Inez Curro, Chloe A Teasdale, Laura C Wyatt, Victoria Foster, Yousra Yusuf, Sonia Sifuentes, Perla Chebli, Julie A Kranick, Simona C Kwon, Chau Trinh-Shevrin, Madison N LeCroy","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0399","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0399","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Asian New York City (NYC) residents have the lowest cancer screening uptake across race and ethnicity. Few studies have examined screening differences across Asian ethnic subgroups in NYC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional survey data were analyzed using multivariable logistic and multinomial regression analyses. Differences among Chinese, Korean, and South Asian adults in breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer (CRC) screening uptake; breast and CRC screening knowledge; and cancer fatalism were examined. Associations between breast and CRC screening knowledge and their uptake were also assessed along with associations between cancer fatalism and breast, cervical, and CRC screening uptake.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Korean women reported 0.52 (95%CI: 0.31, 0.89) times lower odds of Pap test uptake compared to Chinese women; South Asian adults had 0.43 (95%CI: 0.24, 0.79) times lower odds of CRC screening uptake compared to Chinese adults. Korean adults reported 1.80 (95%CI: 1.26, 2.58) times higher odds of knowing the correct age to begin having mammograms compared to Chinese adults; and South Asian adults had 0.67 (95%CI: 0.47, 0.96) times lower odds of knowing the correct age to begin CRC screening compared to Chinese adults. Korean adults had 0.37 (95%CI: 0.27, 0.53) times lower odds of reporting cancer fatalism compared to Chinese adults.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Low cancer screening uptake among Asian American adults, low screening knowledge, and high cancer fatalism were found. Cancer screening uptake, knowledge, and fatalism varied by ethnic subgroup.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Findings indicate the need for ethnic-specific cultural and linguistic tailoring for future cancer screening interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9458,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142139385","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Etiology Drives Survival Outcomes: A Population-Based Analysis. 肝细胞癌病因决定生存结果:基于人群的分析
IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0626
Hannah M Cranford, Patricia D Jones, Robert J Wong, Qinran Liu, Erin N Kobetz, Isildinha M Reis, Tulay Koru-Sengul, Paulo S Pinheiro

Background: Previous survival studies on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by etiology are limited to hospital-based series, restricted cohorts, and monolithic etiological categories. We studied population-based survival by seven mutually exclusive HCC etiologic groups-standalone hepatitis-C virus (HCV), hepatitis-B virus (HBV), alcohol-related liver disease (ALD), non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and dual etiology HCV&HBV, HCV&ALD, and HBV&ALD-accounting for clinical and socio-demographic characteristics.

Methods: All HCC cases diagnosed during 2005-2018 from the Florida Cancer Registry were linked for etiology using statewide discharge and viral hepatitis data. We performed cause-specific survival analysis including Cox regression for the matched 15,616 cases by HCC etiology.

Results: The leading etiology was HCV only (n=4,983; 31.9%); the leading dual etiology was HCV&ALD (n=2,552; 16.3%). Five-year adjusted survival was low, 17.6% overall and <22% across all HCC etiologies; yet ALD-related etiologies [ALD only (14.4%; 95%CI:12.7-16.0), HCV&ALD (10.2%; 95%CI:8.7-11.7), HBV&ALD (8.2%; 95%CI:2.2-14.1)] showed lower survival than non-ALD causes-HCV only, HBV only, and NAFLD only. After adjustment for clinical and socio-demographic covariates, ALD- and HBV&ALD-HCC had 1.20 (95%CI:1.13-1.27) and 1.28 (95%CI:1.06-1.54) times higher risk of death, compared to those with HCV only-HCC.

Conclusions: ALD only and dual etiologies involving ALD show worse prognosis for HCC, compared to viral etiology alone. To increase survival, improved screening and treatment are needed for patients with multiple HCC risk factors.

Impact: Understanding US disparities in HCC survival by etiology can help guide the identification of etiologically specific biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets and inform public health measures.

背景:以往按病因划分的肝细胞癌(HCC)生存率研究仅限于以医院为基础的系列研究、有限的队列和单一的病因类别。我们研究了基于人群的七种相互排斥的HCC病因组--独立的丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)、乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)、酒精相关肝病(ALD)、非酒精性脂肪肝(NAFLD)以及双重病因HCV&HBV、HCV&ALD和HBV&ALD--的生存率,并考虑了临床和社会人口学特征:利用全州出院和病毒性肝炎数据,对佛罗里达癌症登记处 2005-2018 年期间诊断的所有 HCC 病例进行病因学关联。我们按 HCC 病因对匹配的 15,616 例病例进行了包括 Cox 回归在内的特异性病因生存分析:主要病因仅为 HCV(4983 例;31.9%);主要双重病因为 HCV&ALD(2552 例;16.3%)。调整后的五年存活率较低,总体存活率为 17.6%:与单纯病毒性病因相比,单纯 ALD 和涉及 ALD 的双重病因导致的 HCC 预后较差。为了提高存活率,需要改进对具有多种 HCC 危险因素的患者的筛查和治疗:影响:了解美国不同病因导致的 HCC 存活率差异有助于指导确定病因特异性生物标志物和潜在治疗靶点,并为公共卫生措施提供信息。
{"title":"Hepatocellular Carcinoma Etiology Drives Survival Outcomes: A Population-Based Analysis.","authors":"Hannah M Cranford, Patricia D Jones, Robert J Wong, Qinran Liu, Erin N Kobetz, Isildinha M Reis, Tulay Koru-Sengul, Paulo S Pinheiro","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0626","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0626","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous survival studies on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by etiology are limited to hospital-based series, restricted cohorts, and monolithic etiological categories. We studied population-based survival by seven mutually exclusive HCC etiologic groups-standalone hepatitis-C virus (HCV), hepatitis-B virus (HBV), alcohol-related liver disease (ALD), non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and dual etiology HCV&HBV, HCV&ALD, and HBV&ALD-accounting for clinical and socio-demographic characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All HCC cases diagnosed during 2005-2018 from the Florida Cancer Registry were linked for etiology using statewide discharge and viral hepatitis data. We performed cause-specific survival analysis including Cox regression for the matched 15,616 cases by HCC etiology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The leading etiology was HCV only (n=4,983; 31.9%); the leading dual etiology was HCV&ALD (n=2,552; 16.3%). Five-year adjusted survival was low, 17.6% overall and <22% across all HCC etiologies; yet ALD-related etiologies [ALD only (14.4%; 95%CI:12.7-16.0), HCV&ALD (10.2%; 95%CI:8.7-11.7), HBV&ALD (8.2%; 95%CI:2.2-14.1)] showed lower survival than non-ALD causes-HCV only, HBV only, and NAFLD only. After adjustment for clinical and socio-demographic covariates, ALD- and HBV&ALD-HCC had 1.20 (95%CI:1.13-1.27) and 1.28 (95%CI:1.06-1.54) times higher risk of death, compared to those with HCV only-HCC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ALD only and dual etiologies involving ALD show worse prognosis for HCC, compared to viral etiology alone. To increase survival, improved screening and treatment are needed for patients with multiple HCC risk factors.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Understanding US disparities in HCC survival by etiology can help guide the identification of etiologically specific biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets and inform public health measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":9458,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142139386","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
An Update from the Editor-in-Chief. 主编的最新消息
IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1031
Elizabeth A Platz
{"title":"An Update from the Editor-in-Chief.","authors":"Elizabeth A Platz","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1031","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1031","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9458,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142119063","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Geographic Access to Fertility Counseling among Adolescent and Young Adult Women with Cancer in North Carolina. 北卡罗来纳州患有癌症的青少年和年轻成年妇女获得生育咨询的地理位置。
IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0482
Nidia Rodriguez-Ormaza, Chelsea Anderson, Christopher D Baggett, Paul L Delamater, Melissa A Troester, Stephanie B Wheeler, Alexis C Wardell, Allison M Deal, Andrew Smitherman, Jennifer Mersereau, Valerie L Baker, Hazel B Nichols

Background: Fertility counseling is recommended for adolescent and young adult women facing gonadotoxic cancer therapy. However, fertility care is subspecialized medical care offered at a limited number of institutions, making geographic access a potential barrier to guideline-concordant care. We assessed the relationship between geographic access and receipt of fertility counseling among adolescent and young adult women with cancer.

Methods: Using data from the North Carolina Central Cancer Registry, we identified women diagnosed with lymphoma, gynecologic cancer, or breast cancer at ages 15 to 39 years during 2004 to 2015. Eligible women were invited to complete an online survey on various topics, including fertility counseling. Geographic access was measured, using geocoded addresses, as vehicular travel time from residence to the nearest fertility clinic available at diagnosis. Multivariable regression models were used to examine the association between travel time and receipt of fertility counseling by provider type: health care provider versus fertility specialist.

Results: Analyses included 380 women. The median travel time to a fertility clinic was 31 (IQR: 17-71) minutes. Overall, 75% received fertility counseling from a health care provider and 16% by a fertility specialist. Women who lived ≥30 minutes from a clinic were 13% less likely to receive fertility counseling by a health care provider (prevalence ratio: 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.75-1.00) and 49% less likely to receive counseling by a fertility specialist (prevalence ratio: 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.93).

Conclusions: Women who lived further away from fertility clinics were less likely to receive fertility counseling.

Impact: Interventions to improve access to fertility counseling should include strategies to alleviate the burden of geographic access.

背景:建议为面临性腺毒性癌症治疗的青少年女性提供生育咨询。然而,不孕不育治疗是由数量有限的机构提供的亚专科医疗服务,这使得地理位置成为获得与指南一致的治疗的潜在障碍。我们对患癌症的青壮年女性接受生育咨询的地理位置与接受生育咨询之间的关系进行了评估:利用北卡罗来纳州中央癌症登记处的数据,我们确定了 2004-2015 年间被诊断患有淋巴瘤、妇科癌症或乳腺癌的 15-39 岁女性。我们邀请符合条件的女性完成一项在线调查,内容涉及生育咨询等多个主题。使用地理编码地址对地理位置进行测量,即从居住地到诊断时可提供的最近的生育诊所所需的车程时间。采用多变量回归模型来研究旅行时间与接受生育咨询之间的关系,并按提供者类型进行分类:医疗保健提供者与生育专家:分析包括 380 名妇女。前往生育诊所的中位旅行时间为 31 分钟(IQR:17-71 分钟)。总体而言,75%的妇女接受了医疗服务提供者提供的生育咨询,16%的妇女接受了生育专家提供的生育咨询。居住地距离诊所≥30分钟的妇女接受医疗服务提供者提供的生育咨询的可能性要低13%(PR:0.87; 95% CI:0.75-1.00),接受生育专家提供的咨询的可能性要低49%(PR:0.51; 95% CI:0.28-0.93):结论:距离生育诊所较远的妇女接受生育咨询的可能性较低:影响:改善生育咨询的干预措施应包括减轻地理位置负担的策略。
{"title":"Geographic Access to Fertility Counseling among Adolescent and Young Adult Women with Cancer in North Carolina.","authors":"Nidia Rodriguez-Ormaza, Chelsea Anderson, Christopher D Baggett, Paul L Delamater, Melissa A Troester, Stephanie B Wheeler, Alexis C Wardell, Allison M Deal, Andrew Smitherman, Jennifer Mersereau, Valerie L Baker, Hazel B Nichols","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0482","DOIUrl":"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0482","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fertility counseling is recommended for adolescent and young adult women facing gonadotoxic cancer therapy. However, fertility care is subspecialized medical care offered at a limited number of institutions, making geographic access a potential barrier to guideline-concordant care. We assessed the relationship between geographic access and receipt of fertility counseling among adolescent and young adult women with cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the North Carolina Central Cancer Registry, we identified women diagnosed with lymphoma, gynecologic cancer, or breast cancer at ages 15 to 39 years during 2004 to 2015. Eligible women were invited to complete an online survey on various topics, including fertility counseling. Geographic access was measured, using geocoded addresses, as vehicular travel time from residence to the nearest fertility clinic available at diagnosis. Multivariable regression models were used to examine the association between travel time and receipt of fertility counseling by provider type: health care provider versus fertility specialist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analyses included 380 women. The median travel time to a fertility clinic was 31 (IQR: 17-71) minutes. Overall, 75% received fertility counseling from a health care provider and 16% by a fertility specialist. Women who lived ≥30 minutes from a clinic were 13% less likely to receive fertility counseling by a health care provider (prevalence ratio: 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.75-1.00) and 49% less likely to receive counseling by a fertility specialist (prevalence ratio: 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.93).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Women who lived further away from fertility clinics were less likely to receive fertility counseling.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Interventions to improve access to fertility counseling should include strategies to alleviate the burden of geographic access.</p>","PeriodicalId":9458,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11371502/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141562644","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluation of the Immune Response within the Tumor Microenvironment in African American and Non-Hispanic White Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. 评估非裔美国人和非西班牙裔白人非小细胞肺癌患者肿瘤微环境中的免疫反应。
IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0333
Matthew R Trendowski, Donovan Watza, Christine M Lusk, Fulvio Lonardo, Valerie Ratliff, Angela S Wenzlaff, Hirva Mamdani, Christine Neslund-Dudas, Julie L Boerner, Ann G Schwartz, Heather M Gibson

Background: African Americans have higher incidence and mortality from lung cancer than non-Hispanic Whites, but investigations into differences in immune response have been minimal. Therefore, we compared components of the tumor microenvironment among African Americans and non-Hispanic Whites diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer based on PDL1 or tertiary lymphoid structure (TLS) status to identify differences of translational relevance.

Methods: Using a cohort of 280 patients with non-small cell lung cancer from the Inflammation, Health, Ancestry, and Lung Epidemiology study (non-Hispanic White: n = 155; African American: n = 125), we evaluated PDL1 tumor proportion score (<1% vs. ≥1%) and TLS status (presence/absence), comparing differences within the tumor microenvironment based on immune cell distribution and differential expression of genes.

Results: Tumors from African Americans had a higher proportion of plasma cell signatures within the tumor microenvironment than non-Hispanic Whites. In addition, gene expression patterns in African American PDL1-positive samples suggest that these tumors contained greater numbers of γδ T cells and resting dendritic cells, along with fewer CD8+ T cells after adjusting for age, sex, pack-years, stage, and histology. Investigation of differential expression of B cell/plasma cell-related genes between the two patient populations revealed that two immunoglobulin genes (IGKV2-29 and IGLL5) were associated with decreased mortality risk in African Americans.

Conclusions: In the first known race-stratified analysis of tumor microenvironment components in lung cancer based on PDL1 expression or TLS status, differences within the immune cell composition and transcriptomic signature were identified that may have therapeutic implications.

Impact: Future investigation of racial variation within the tumor microenvironment may help direct the use of immunotherapy.

背景:非裔美国人的肺癌发病率和死亡率均高于非西班牙裔白人,但有关免疫反应差异的研究却很少。因此,我们根据 PD-L1 或三级淋巴结构(TLS)状态比较了非裔美国人和非西班牙裔白人中确诊为非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的肿瘤微环境成分,以确定与转化相关的差异:我们利用INHALE研究中的280名NSCLC患者(非西班牙裔白人:n=155;非裔美国人:n=125),对PD-L1肿瘤比例评分进行了评估(结果:非裔美国人的肿瘤比例评分更高,而非裔美国人的肿瘤比例评分更低):与非西班牙裔白人相比,非裔美国人的肿瘤微环境中浆细胞特征的比例更高。此外,非裔美国人 PD-L1 阳性样本的基因表达模式表明,在调整年龄、性别、包年、分期和组织学后,这些肿瘤含有更多的 γδ T 细胞和静息树突状细胞,而 CD8+ T 细胞较少。对两个患者群体的 B 细胞/浆细胞相关基因的差异表达进行调查后发现,两个免疫球蛋白基因(IGKV2-29 和 IGLL5)与非裔美国人的死亡风险降低有关:在首次基于 PD-L1 表达或 TLS 状态对肺癌肿瘤微环境成分进行的已知种族分层分析中,发现了免疫细胞组成和转录组特征的差异,这些差异可能具有治疗意义:影响:未来对肿瘤微环境中种族差异的研究可能有助于指导免疫疗法的使用。
{"title":"Evaluation of the Immune Response within the Tumor Microenvironment in African American and Non-Hispanic White Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.","authors":"Matthew R Trendowski, Donovan Watza, Christine M Lusk, Fulvio Lonardo, Valerie Ratliff, Angela S Wenzlaff, Hirva Mamdani, Christine Neslund-Dudas, Julie L Boerner, Ann G Schwartz, Heather M Gibson","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0333","DOIUrl":"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0333","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>African Americans have higher incidence and mortality from lung cancer than non-Hispanic Whites, but investigations into differences in immune response have been minimal. Therefore, we compared components of the tumor microenvironment among African Americans and non-Hispanic Whites diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer based on PDL1 or tertiary lymphoid structure (TLS) status to identify differences of translational relevance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a cohort of 280 patients with non-small cell lung cancer from the Inflammation, Health, Ancestry, and Lung Epidemiology study (non-Hispanic White: n = 155; African American: n = 125), we evaluated PDL1 tumor proportion score (<1% vs. ≥1%) and TLS status (presence/absence), comparing differences within the tumor microenvironment based on immune cell distribution and differential expression of genes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Tumors from African Americans had a higher proportion of plasma cell signatures within the tumor microenvironment than non-Hispanic Whites. In addition, gene expression patterns in African American PDL1-positive samples suggest that these tumors contained greater numbers of γδ T cells and resting dendritic cells, along with fewer CD8+ T cells after adjusting for age, sex, pack-years, stage, and histology. Investigation of differential expression of B cell/plasma cell-related genes between the two patient populations revealed that two immunoglobulin genes (IGKV2-29 and IGLL5) were associated with decreased mortality risk in African Americans.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the first known race-stratified analysis of tumor microenvironment components in lung cancer based on PDL1 expression or TLS status, differences within the immune cell composition and transcriptomic signature were identified that may have therapeutic implications.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Future investigation of racial variation within the tumor microenvironment may help direct the use of immunotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9458,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11371519/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141490965","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Lung microbial and host genomic signatures as predictors of prognosis in early-stage adenocarcinoma. 预测早期腺癌预后的肺部微生物和宿主基因组特征
IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0661
Jun-Chieh J Tsay, Fares Darawshy, Chan Wang, Benjamin Kwok, Kendrew K Wong, Benjamin G Wu, Imran Sulaiman, Hua Zhou, Bradley Isaacs, Matthias C Kugler, Elizabeth Sanchez, Alexander Bain, Yonghua Li, Rosemary Schluger, Alena Lukovnikova, Destiny Collazo, Yaa Kyeremateng, Ray Pillai, Miao Chang, Qingsheng Li, Rami S Vanguri, Anton S Becker, William H Moore, George Thurston, Terry Gordon, Andre L Moreira, Chandra M Goparaju, Daniel H Sterman, Aristotelis Tsirigos, Huilin Li, Leopoldo N Segal, Harvey I Pass

Background: Risk of early-stage lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) recurrence after surgical resection is significant, and post-recurrence median survival is approximately two years. Currently there are no commercially available biomarkers that predict recurrence. Here, we investigated whether microbial and host genomic signatures in the lung can predict recurrence.

Methods: In 91 early-stage (Stage IA/IB) LUAD-patients with extensive follow-up, we used 16s rRNA gene sequencing and host RNA-sequencing to map the microbial and host transcriptomic landscape in tumor and adjacent unaffected lung samples.

Results: 23 out of 91 subjects had tumor recurrence over 5-year period. In tumor samples, LUAD recurrence was associated with enrichment with Dialister, Prevotella, while in unaffected lung, recurrence was associated with enrichment with Sphyngomonas and Alloiococcus. The strengths of the associations between microbial and host genomic signatures with LUAD recurrence were greater in adjacent unaffected lung samples than in the primary tumor. Among microbial-host features in the unaffected lung samples associated with recurrence, enrichment with Stenotrophomonas geniculata and Chryseobacterium were positively correlated with upregulation of IL-2, IL-3, IL-17, EGFR, HIF-1 signaling pathways among the host transcriptome. In tumor samples, enrichment with Veillonellaceae Dialister, Ruminococcacea, Haemophilus Influenza, and Neisseria were positively correlated with upregulation of IL-1, IL-6, IL17, IFN, and Tryptophan metabolism pathways.

Conclusions: Overall, modeling suggested that a combined microbial/transcriptome approach using unaffected lung samples had the best biomarker performance (AUC=0.83).

Impact: This study suggests that LUAD recurrence is associated with distinct pathophysiological mechanisms of microbial-host interactions in the unaffected lung rather than those present in the resected tumor.

背景:早期肺腺癌(LUAD)手术切除后复发的风险很大,复发后的中位生存期约为两年。目前还没有可预测复发的商业生物标志物。在此,我们研究了肺部的微生物和宿主基因组特征能否预测复发:方法:我们对 91 例早期(IA/IB 期)LUAD 患者进行了广泛的随访,利用 16s rRNA 基因测序和宿主 RNA 测序绘制了肿瘤和邻近未受影响肺部样本中的微生物和宿主转录组图谱。在肿瘤样本中,LUAD复发与Dialister和Prevotella的富集有关,而在未受影响的肺中,复发与Sphyngomonas和Alloiococcus的富集有关。相邻的未受影响肺样本中微生物和宿主基因组特征与LUAD复发的相关性强于原发肿瘤。在未受影响肺样本中与复发相关的微生物-宿主特征中,基因链球菌和干酪杆菌的富集与宿主转录组中IL-2、IL-3、IL-17、表皮生长因子受体、HIF-1信号通路的上调呈正相关。在肿瘤样本中,Veillonellaceae Dialister、Ruminococcacea、流感嗜血杆菌和奈瑟氏菌的富集与IL-1、IL-6、IL17、IFN和色氨酸代谢途径的上调呈正相关:总体而言,建模表明,使用未受影响的肺部样本的微生物/转录组联合方法具有最佳的生物标志物性能(AUC=0.83):这项研究表明,LUAD的复发与未受影响肺部中微生物-宿主相互作用的不同病理生理机制有关,而非切除肿瘤中的病理生理机制。
{"title":"Lung microbial and host genomic signatures as predictors of prognosis in early-stage adenocarcinoma.","authors":"Jun-Chieh J Tsay, Fares Darawshy, Chan Wang, Benjamin Kwok, Kendrew K Wong, Benjamin G Wu, Imran Sulaiman, Hua Zhou, Bradley Isaacs, Matthias C Kugler, Elizabeth Sanchez, Alexander Bain, Yonghua Li, Rosemary Schluger, Alena Lukovnikova, Destiny Collazo, Yaa Kyeremateng, Ray Pillai, Miao Chang, Qingsheng Li, Rami S Vanguri, Anton S Becker, William H Moore, George Thurston, Terry Gordon, Andre L Moreira, Chandra M Goparaju, Daniel H Sterman, Aristotelis Tsirigos, Huilin Li, Leopoldo N Segal, Harvey I Pass","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0661","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0661","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Risk of early-stage lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) recurrence after surgical resection is significant, and post-recurrence median survival is approximately two years. Currently there are no commercially available biomarkers that predict recurrence. Here, we investigated whether microbial and host genomic signatures in the lung can predict recurrence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 91 early-stage (Stage IA/IB) LUAD-patients with extensive follow-up, we used 16s rRNA gene sequencing and host RNA-sequencing to map the microbial and host transcriptomic landscape in tumor and adjacent unaffected lung samples.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>23 out of 91 subjects had tumor recurrence over 5-year period. In tumor samples, LUAD recurrence was associated with enrichment with Dialister, Prevotella, while in unaffected lung, recurrence was associated with enrichment with Sphyngomonas and Alloiococcus. The strengths of the associations between microbial and host genomic signatures with LUAD recurrence were greater in adjacent unaffected lung samples than in the primary tumor. Among microbial-host features in the unaffected lung samples associated with recurrence, enrichment with Stenotrophomonas geniculata and Chryseobacterium were positively correlated with upregulation of IL-2, IL-3, IL-17, EGFR, HIF-1 signaling pathways among the host transcriptome. In tumor samples, enrichment with Veillonellaceae Dialister, Ruminococcacea, Haemophilus Influenza, and Neisseria were positively correlated with upregulation of IL-1, IL-6, IL17, IFN, and Tryptophan metabolism pathways.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, modeling suggested that a combined microbial/transcriptome approach using unaffected lung samples had the best biomarker performance (AUC=0.83).</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>This study suggests that LUAD recurrence is associated with distinct pathophysiological mechanisms of microbial-host interactions in the unaffected lung rather than those present in the resected tumor.</p>","PeriodicalId":9458,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142119062","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1