European Organisation for Caries Research and the European Federation of Conservative Dentistry Consensus Report on Clinical Recommendations for Caries Diagnosis: Paper III - Caries Diagnosis at the Individual Level.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Caries Research Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-31 DOI:10.1159/000539427
Marie-Charlotte Huysmans, Margherita Fontana, Adrian Lussi, Anahita Jablonski-Momeni, Avijit Banerjee, David Ricketts, Falk Schwendicke, Fausto Medeiros Mendes, Gail Douglas, Gottfried Schmalz, Guglielmo Campus, Johan Aps, Keith Horner, Klaus W Neuhaus, Monique Harriët van der Veen, Niek Opdam, Sophie Doméjean, Stefania Martignon, Jan Kühnisch, Christian H Splieth
{"title":"European Organisation for Caries Research and the European Federation of Conservative Dentistry Consensus Report on Clinical Recommendations for Caries Diagnosis: Paper III - Caries Diagnosis at the Individual Level.","authors":"Marie-Charlotte Huysmans, Margherita Fontana, Adrian Lussi, Anahita Jablonski-Momeni, Avijit Banerjee, David Ricketts, Falk Schwendicke, Fausto Medeiros Mendes, Gail Douglas, Gottfried Schmalz, Guglielmo Campus, Johan Aps, Keith Horner, Klaus W Neuhaus, Monique Harriët van der Veen, Niek Opdam, Sophie Doméjean, Stefania Martignon, Jan Kühnisch, Christian H Splieth","doi":"10.1159/000539427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the present consensus paper was to provide recommendations for clinical practice on the individual etiological and modifying factors to be assessed in the individual diagnosis of caries, and the methods for their assessment, supporting personalized treatment decisions.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The executive councils of the European Organisation for Caries Research (ORCA) and the European Federation of Conservative Dentistry (EFCD) nominated ten experts each to join the expert panel. The steering committee formed three work groups which were asked to provide recommendations on (1) caries detection and diagnostic methods, (2) caries activity assessment, and (3) forming individualized caries diagnoses. The experts responsible for \"individualised caries diagnosis\" searched and evaluated the relevant literature, drafted this manuscript and made provisional consensus recommendations. These recommendations were discussed and refined during the structured process in the whole work group. Finally, the agreement for each recommendation was determined using an anonymous eDelphi survey. The threshold for approval of recommendations was determined at 70% agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten recommendations were approved and agreed by the whole expert panel, covering medical history, caries experience, plaque, diet, fluoride, and saliva. While the level of evidence was low, the level of agreement was typically very high, except for one recommendation on salivary flow measurement, where 70% agreed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is recommended that all aspects of caries lesion progression and activity, recent caries experience, medical conditions and medications, plaque, diet, fluoride and saliva should be synthesized to arrive at an individual diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The expert panel merged evidence from existing guidelines and scientific literature with practical considerations and provided recommendations for their use in daily dental practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":9620,"journal":{"name":"Caries Research","volume":" ","pages":"521-532"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Caries Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000539427","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the present consensus paper was to provide recommendations for clinical practice on the individual etiological and modifying factors to be assessed in the individual diagnosis of caries, and the methods for their assessment, supporting personalized treatment decisions.

Material and methods: The executive councils of the European Organisation for Caries Research (ORCA) and the European Federation of Conservative Dentistry (EFCD) nominated ten experts each to join the expert panel. The steering committee formed three work groups which were asked to provide recommendations on (1) caries detection and diagnostic methods, (2) caries activity assessment, and (3) forming individualized caries diagnoses. The experts responsible for "individualised caries diagnosis" searched and evaluated the relevant literature, drafted this manuscript and made provisional consensus recommendations. These recommendations were discussed and refined during the structured process in the whole work group. Finally, the agreement for each recommendation was determined using an anonymous eDelphi survey. The threshold for approval of recommendations was determined at 70% agreement.

Results: Ten recommendations were approved and agreed by the whole expert panel, covering medical history, caries experience, plaque, diet, fluoride, and saliva. While the level of evidence was low, the level of agreement was typically very high, except for one recommendation on salivary flow measurement, where 70% agreed.

Conclusion: It is recommended that all aspects of caries lesion progression and activity, recent caries experience, medical conditions and medications, plaque, diet, fluoride and saliva should be synthesized to arrive at an individual diagnosis.

Clinical relevance: The expert panel merged evidence from existing guidelines and scientific literature with practical considerations and provided recommendations for their use in daily dental practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ORCA-EFCD 龋病诊断临床建议共识报告。文件 III:个人层面的龋齿诊断。
本共识文件旨在为临床实践提供建议,说明在龋病个体诊断中需要评估的个体病因和改变因素,以及评估这些因素的方法,从而为个性化治疗决策提供支持。欧洲龋病研究组织(ORCA)和欧洲保守牙科联盟(EFCD)的执行理事会分别提名了十位专家加入专家小组。指导委员会成立了三个工作小组,要求他们就以下方面提出建议:1)龋病检测和诊断方法;2)龋病活动评估;3)形成个性化的龋病诊断。负责 "个性化龋齿诊断 "的专家们搜索并评估了相关文献,起草了本手稿,并提出了临时性的共识建议。在整个工作小组的结构化过程中,对这些建议进行了讨论和完善。最后,通过匿名 eDelphi 调查确定了每项建议的一致意见。建议获得批准的门槛为 70%的同意率。有 10 项建议得到了整个专家小组的批准和同意,涉及病史、龋病经历、牙菌斑、饮食、氟化物和唾液。虽然证据水平较低,但一致程度通常很高,只有一项关于唾液流量测量的建议得到了 70% 的同意。建议应综合龋损进展和活动、近期龋病经历、医疗条件和药物、牙菌斑、饮食、氟化物和唾液等各方面的情况,以得出个人诊断结果。专家小组将现有指南和科学文献中的证据与实际考虑因素相结合,并提出了在日常牙科实践中使用的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Caries Research
Caries Research 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
34
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Caries Research'' publishes epidemiological, clinical and laboratory studies in dental caries, erosion and related dental diseases. Some studies build on the considerable advances already made in caries prevention, e.g. through fluoride application. Some aim to improve understanding of the increasingly important problem of dental erosion and the associated tooth wear process. Others monitor the changing pattern of caries in different populations, explore improved methods of diagnosis or evaluate methods of prevention or treatment. The broad coverage of current research has given the journal an international reputation as an indispensable source for both basic scientists and clinicians engaged in understanding, investigating and preventing dental disease.
期刊最新文献
Selective outcome reporting bias in randomized controlled trials on dental caries in children and adolescents: A meta-research study. Is poor self-rated health associated with higher caries experience in adults? The HUNT4 Oral Health Study. Concentration and Stability of Fluoride Chemically Available in Charcoal-Containing Toothpastes. Dentists' Treatment Decisions Concerning Restorations in Adult Patients in North Norway: A Cross-Sectional Tromsø 7 Study. Dietary Carbohydrates Modulate Streptococcus mutans Adherence and Bacterial Proteome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1