Introduction The objective of this study was to investigate the treatment success rate of teeth treated with stepwise caries removal procedure (SWP) using SKaPa registry data. Methods Study design was a retrospective analysis of longitudinal SKaPa database data. SWP treated teeth with a minimum of one follow-up visit was included (January 1, 2013 to April 1, 2022). Teeth that had not been treated endodontically or extracted during the follow-up period was considered successful. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (p<0.01) in combination with descriptive statistics was used for statistics. Results A total of 111 771 teeth were included (50.7% women; 49.3% men). The most frequent tooth group was molars (71.5%). The results demonstrate a treatment success rate of over 60% after 110 months for teeth with deep caries lesions treated with SWP. Age was a statistically significant variable (p = 0.00) with increased survival rate for younger age groups. Conclusions Although SWP is performed on teeth with poor prognoses, the overall treatment success rate is over 60% after nine years. Age, tooth group, localization, and caries risk are factors that could affect the outcome after SWP, with an improved prognosis for premolars, subjects under 40 years of age, and subjects with low or medium caries risk.
{"title":"Long-term treatment success rate after stepwise caries removal: a registry study.","authors":"Joy Malmberg, Anders Hedenbjörk-Lager","doi":"10.1159/000551560","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000551560","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction The objective of this study was to investigate the treatment success rate of teeth treated with stepwise caries removal procedure (SWP) using SKaPa registry data. Methods Study design was a retrospective analysis of longitudinal SKaPa database data. SWP treated teeth with a minimum of one follow-up visit was included (January 1, 2013 to April 1, 2022). Teeth that had not been treated endodontically or extracted during the follow-up period was considered successful. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (p<0.01) in combination with descriptive statistics was used for statistics. Results A total of 111 771 teeth were included (50.7% women; 49.3% men). The most frequent tooth group was molars (71.5%). The results demonstrate a treatment success rate of over 60% after 110 months for teeth with deep caries lesions treated with SWP. Age was a statistically significant variable (p = 0.00) with increased survival rate for younger age groups. Conclusions Although SWP is performed on teeth with poor prognoses, the overall treatment success rate is over 60% after nine years. Age, tooth group, localization, and caries risk are factors that could affect the outcome after SWP, with an improved prognosis for premolars, subjects under 40 years of age, and subjects with low or medium caries risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":9620,"journal":{"name":"Caries Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147472812","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
: Introduction Evidence suggests that a low copy number (CN) (2-3) of the α-amylase 1 gene (AMY1) may reduce the risk of dental caries, although findings remain inconsistent. Variations observed between studies could potentially be explained by the modulation of third factors, such as obesity, which may amplify the cariogenic potential of high AMY1 CN. This cross-sectional study explored the relationship between AMY1 gene CN variation (CNV) and dental caries experience, assessed with the Decayed and Filled Surfaces (DFS) index in young adults, and whether this association varied by obesity status. Methods A total of 597 participants (52.4% female, aged 26 - 29 years) from the Norwegian Fit Futures 3 study (2021-2022) were included. Salivary AMY1 CN was measured using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR). Obesity was defined as BMI ≥30 kg/m². We analysed AMY1 CN as both continuous and categorical variables (2-3 (17%), 4-6 (53%), and 7-14 (30%) CN) using logistic regression. Results Although AMY1 CN alone was not associated with DFS, its interaction with obesity was significant (p = 0.036). Among obese individuals, a one-unit increase in AMY1 CN raised the probability of DFS ≥9 by 4.7 percentage points, with no association observed in non-obese individuals. In obese participants (n = 103), sex-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for DFS ≥9 were as follows: OR 1.25 (95% CI: 1.01-1.53) per unit increase in AMY1 CN; OR 3.47 (95% CI: 1.23-9.79) for 4-6 vs. 2-3 CN, and OR 4.48 (95% CI: 1.35-14.89) for 7-14 vs. 2-3 CN. Conclusion This study found that AMY1 gene CN alone was not directly associated with dental caries in young adults. However, obesity was identified as an effect modifier in the relationship between salivary AMY1 CNV and dental caries experience. Specifically, dental caries experience was higher in obese individuals with above-average AMY1 CN. These findings highlight the complex interplay between genetic, metabolic, and behavioural factors in dental caries development. Further research is needed to confirm these results and to explore the underlying mechanisms of this interaction.
{"title":"Low AMY1 gene copy numbers in saliva are associated with reduced dental caries experience in obese adults.","authors":"Synnøve Bække, Natalia Petrenya, Berit Tommeras, Tracy Munthali Lunde, Elin Hadler-Olsen, Rania Al-Mahdi","doi":"10.1159/000551203","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000551203","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>: Introduction Evidence suggests that a low copy number (CN) (2-3) of the α-amylase 1 gene (AMY1) may reduce the risk of dental caries, although findings remain inconsistent. Variations observed between studies could potentially be explained by the modulation of third factors, such as obesity, which may amplify the cariogenic potential of high AMY1 CN. This cross-sectional study explored the relationship between AMY1 gene CN variation (CNV) and dental caries experience, assessed with the Decayed and Filled Surfaces (DFS) index in young adults, and whether this association varied by obesity status. Methods A total of 597 participants (52.4% female, aged 26 - 29 years) from the Norwegian Fit Futures 3 study (2021-2022) were included. Salivary AMY1 CN was measured using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR). Obesity was defined as BMI ≥30 kg/m². We analysed AMY1 CN as both continuous and categorical variables (2-3 (17%), 4-6 (53%), and 7-14 (30%) CN) using logistic regression. Results Although AMY1 CN alone was not associated with DFS, its interaction with obesity was significant (p = 0.036). Among obese individuals, a one-unit increase in AMY1 CN raised the probability of DFS ≥9 by 4.7 percentage points, with no association observed in non-obese individuals. In obese participants (n = 103), sex-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for DFS ≥9 were as follows: OR 1.25 (95% CI: 1.01-1.53) per unit increase in AMY1 CN; OR 3.47 (95% CI: 1.23-9.79) for 4-6 vs. 2-3 CN, and OR 4.48 (95% CI: 1.35-14.89) for 7-14 vs. 2-3 CN. Conclusion This study found that AMY1 gene CN alone was not directly associated with dental caries in young adults. However, obesity was identified as an effect modifier in the relationship between salivary AMY1 CNV and dental caries experience. Specifically, dental caries experience was higher in obese individuals with above-average AMY1 CN. These findings highlight the complex interplay between genetic, metabolic, and behavioural factors in dental caries development. Further research is needed to confirm these results and to explore the underlying mechanisms of this interaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":9620,"journal":{"name":"Caries Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147389645","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mariél de Aquino Goulart, Jorge Celis-Dooner, Fanny Petermann-Rocha, David I Conway, Andrés Celis, Alex D McMahon
Introduction Socioeconomic inequalities in childhood dental caries remain a major public health concern, even in countries with declining overall prevalence. Chile provides a unique setting to examine these inequalities nationally and assess the potential mitigating role of systemic fluoride delivery programmes. Methods This ecological cohort study analysed 1,261,690 dental examinations of 12-year-olds across 325 Chilean municipalities from 2009 to 2023, representing 99.8% of eligible national records. Caries prevalence was modelled against area socioeconomic deprivation (IDSE deciles), adjusting for rurality and systemic fluoride delivery programmes, and weighting for number of total examinations by municipality/year. Inequality metrics included Absolute Rate Difference (ARD), Slope Index of Inequality (SII), and Relative Index of Inequality (RII). Results A strong and persistent socioeconomic gradient was observed: adolescents in the most deprived municipalities had a 17 percentage-point higher caries prevalence than those in the least deprived (β = -0.17, 95% CI: -0.20, -0.14). This gradient followed a dose-response pattern and was confirmed by summary measures (ARD = 0.151; RRR = 1.234). Temporal analysis revealed peak inequality pre-pandemic (SII = 0.17, 95% CI: -0.20, -0.14), followed by a steady decline post-2018, reaching non-significant levels by 2023 (SII = 0.04, 95% CI: -0.15, 0.06). Fluoridation programmes modestly attenuated the deprivation gradient by 24% (β = -0.13), though they explained limited variance (ΔR² = 0.04). Conclusion Socioeconomic inequalities in dental caries among Chilean adolescents remain substantial, despite national declines in prevalence. While systemic fluoridation contributes to modest reductions in inequality, structural determinants are the primary drivers of persistent inequalities.
{"title":"Trends in Socioeconomic Inequalities of Dental Caries Experience Among 12-Year-Olds in Chile: an Ecological Cohort Study.","authors":"Mariél de Aquino Goulart, Jorge Celis-Dooner, Fanny Petermann-Rocha, David I Conway, Andrés Celis, Alex D McMahon","doi":"10.1159/000551081","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000551081","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction Socioeconomic inequalities in childhood dental caries remain a major public health concern, even in countries with declining overall prevalence. Chile provides a unique setting to examine these inequalities nationally and assess the potential mitigating role of systemic fluoride delivery programmes. Methods This ecological cohort study analysed 1,261,690 dental examinations of 12-year-olds across 325 Chilean municipalities from 2009 to 2023, representing 99.8% of eligible national records. Caries prevalence was modelled against area socioeconomic deprivation (IDSE deciles), adjusting for rurality and systemic fluoride delivery programmes, and weighting for number of total examinations by municipality/year. Inequality metrics included Absolute Rate Difference (ARD), Slope Index of Inequality (SII), and Relative Index of Inequality (RII). Results A strong and persistent socioeconomic gradient was observed: adolescents in the most deprived municipalities had a 17 percentage-point higher caries prevalence than those in the least deprived (β = -0.17, 95% CI: -0.20, -0.14). This gradient followed a dose-response pattern and was confirmed by summary measures (ARD = 0.151; RRR = 1.234). Temporal analysis revealed peak inequality pre-pandemic (SII = 0.17, 95% CI: -0.20, -0.14), followed by a steady decline post-2018, reaching non-significant levels by 2023 (SII = 0.04, 95% CI: -0.15, 0.06). Fluoridation programmes modestly attenuated the deprivation gradient by 24% (β = -0.13), though they explained limited variance (ΔR² = 0.04). Conclusion Socioeconomic inequalities in dental caries among Chilean adolescents remain substantial, despite national declines in prevalence. While systemic fluoridation contributes to modest reductions in inequality, structural determinants are the primary drivers of persistent inequalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":9620,"journal":{"name":"Caries Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147275947","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In the article "Salivary Proteins and Metabolites as Caries Biomarkers in Adolescents" [Caries Res. 2024;58(6):573-588. https://doi.org/10.1159/000540090] by Havsed et al. an error in the headings of Table 1 has been identified. Due to incorrect labelling in Table 1 the CA (caries group) should have been placed in the left panel and CF (caries-free) should have been placed in the right panel.The authors have checked the statistical calculations to confirm the error is in the labelling of Table 1.The corrected Table 1 is shown here:Table 1.Oral hygiene and diet factors in caries-free (CF) and caries-experienced (CA) groupsCA (N = 20)CF (N = 20)p valueTooth brushing (using fluoride toothpaste) frequency ≥2 tpd7 (35)15 (75)0.039 opd10 (50)4 (20) 0-6 tpw3 (15)1 (5)Fluoride supplement ≥opd1 (5)5 (25)0.024 2-6 tpw5 (25)7 (35) 2-7 tpw8 (40)8 (40) ≤opm6 (30)0Diet frequency 1-3 tpd2 (10)3 (15)0.336 4-6 tpd10 (50)12 (60) 7-9 tpd5 (25)5 (25) ≥10 tpd3 (15)0Consumption of sweetened beverages, soda and energy drinks ≤opw2 (10)8 (40)0.002 2-3 tpw4 (20)10 (50) 4-6 tpw8 (40)2 (10) ≥opd6 (30)0Consumption of candies, ice cream, sweet, coffee bread and snacks ≤opw1 (5)8 (40)0.026 2-3 tpw6 (30)7 (35) 4-6 tpw9 (45)4 (20) ≥opd4 (20)1 (5)opd, once per day; opm, once per month; opw, once per week; tpd, times per day; tpw, times per week; tpm, times per month.Data represent number of participants (and percentages) corresponding to different answer options. Four out of the five parameters showed statistically significant differences between the groups (χ2 test), with a lower tooth brushing frequency, lower use of fluoride supplement, higher consumption of sweetened beverages, soda and energy drinks as well as ice cream, sweet, coffee bread and snacks in the CA group.
{"title":"Erratum.","authors":"","doi":"10.1159/000550544","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000550544","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the article \"Salivary Proteins and Metabolites as Caries Biomarkers in Adolescents\" [Caries Res. 2024;58(6):573-588. https://doi.org/10.1159/000540090] by Havsed et al. an error in the headings of Table 1 has been identified. Due to incorrect labelling in Table 1 the CA (caries group) should have been placed in the left panel and CF (caries-free) should have been placed in the right panel.The authors have checked the statistical calculations to confirm the error is in the labelling of Table 1.The corrected Table 1 is shown here:Table 1.Oral hygiene and diet factors in caries-free (CF) and caries-experienced (CA) groupsCA (N = 20)CF (N = 20)p valueTooth brushing (using fluoride toothpaste) frequency ≥2 tpd7 (35)15 (75)0.039 opd10 (50)4 (20) 0-6 tpw3 (15)1 (5)Fluoride supplement ≥opd1 (5)5 (25)0.024 2-6 tpw5 (25)7 (35) 2-7 tpw8 (40)8 (40) ≤opm6 (30)0Diet frequency 1-3 tpd2 (10)3 (15)0.336 4-6 tpd10 (50)12 (60) 7-9 tpd5 (25)5 (25) ≥10 tpd3 (15)0Consumption of sweetened beverages, soda and energy drinks ≤opw2 (10)8 (40)0.002 2-3 tpw4 (20)10 (50) 4-6 tpw8 (40)2 (10) ≥opd6 (30)0Consumption of candies, ice cream, sweet, coffee bread and snacks ≤opw1 (5)8 (40)0.026 2-3 tpw6 (30)7 (35) 4-6 tpw9 (45)4 (20) ≥opd4 (20)1 (5)opd, once per day; opm, once per month; opw, once per week; tpd, times per day; tpw, times per week; tpm, times per month.Data represent number of participants (and percentages) corresponding to different answer options. Four out of the five parameters showed statistically significant differences between the groups (χ2 test), with a lower tooth brushing frequency, lower use of fluoride supplement, higher consumption of sweetened beverages, soda and energy drinks as well as ice cream, sweet, coffee bread and snacks in the CA group.</p>","PeriodicalId":9620,"journal":{"name":"Caries Research","volume":" ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146212317","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Dilek Sezen-Hulsmans, Tatiana Pereira-Cenci, Rutger E Sonneveld, Bas A C Loomans, Maximiliano S Cenci
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) support is expected to increase accuracy and improve treatment plans in dentistry. Nevertheless, AI's ability to promote better oral healthcare is underexplored. This scoping review explores the influence of AI in supporting dental professionals with caries detection and decision-making regarding interventions.
Summary: Primary articles indexed on PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched until August 2025. Studies reporting the differences between participants' caries diagnosis process and decision-making with and without AI were included. Studies only reporting algorithm accuracy, in vitro studies, or studies without an outcome related to caries detection with AI support were excluded. No time and language limits were imposed. Outcomes regarding the influence of AI on the diagnostics process and decision-making were retrieved and narratively summarised.
Key messages: Thirteen publications were included. Number of participants ranged from 3 to 74, comprising dentists with varying experience and expertise and dental students. Results showed that AI enhances sensitivity, though its impact on specificity varies (10 studies). AI can promote unnecessary interventions for early-stage caries lesions (1 study). AI increased assessment time in two out of three cases (3 studies). AI's cost-effectiveness is uncertain, as greater sensitivity did not lead to better economic outcomes (1 study). In conclusion, AI has the potential to improve diagnostics and influence treatment choices, but current evidence is limited and inconsistent regarding its impact on specificity, decision quality, and cost-effectiveness. Longitudinal studies in clinical settings with long-term follow-ups are needed to understand AI's impact on decision-making.
背景与目的:人工智能(AI)的支持有望提高牙科治疗的准确性和改善治疗方案。然而,人工智能促进更好口腔卫生保健的能力尚未得到充分探索。本综述探讨了人工智能在支持牙科专业人员龋齿检测和干预决策方面的影响。方法:检索PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、Scopus和Cochrane图书馆检索到2025年8月的主要文章。研究报告了有人工智能和没有人工智能的参与者的龋齿诊断过程和决策之间的差异。仅报告算法准确性的研究、体外研究或没有与人工智能支持的龋齿检测相关结果的研究被排除在外。没有时间和语言的限制。检索并叙述总结了人工智能对诊断过程和决策影响的结果。结果:纳入13篇文献。参与调查的人数由3人至74人不等,包括有不同经验和专业知识的牙医,以及牙科学生。结果表明,人工智能增强了敏感性,但对特异性的影响有所不同(10项研究)。人工智能可以促进对早期龋齿病变进行不必要的干预(1项研究)。人工智能增加了三分之二病例(3项研究)的评估时间。人工智能的成本效益是不确定的,因为更高的灵敏度并没有带来更好的经济结果(1项研究)。临床意义:人工智能具有改善诊断和影响治疗选择的潜力,但目前关于其对特异性、决策质量和成本效益的影响的证据有限且不一致。需要在临床环境中进行长期随访的纵向研究,以了解人工智能对决策的影响。
{"title":"Assessing the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Caries Detection and Clinical Decision-Making: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Dilek Sezen-Hulsmans, Tatiana Pereira-Cenci, Rutger E Sonneveld, Bas A C Loomans, Maximiliano S Cenci","doi":"10.1159/000550238","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000550238","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) support is expected to increase accuracy and improve treatment plans in dentistry. Nevertheless, AI's ability to promote better oral healthcare is underexplored. This scoping review explores the influence of AI in supporting dental professionals with caries detection and decision-making regarding interventions.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Primary articles indexed on PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched until August 2025. Studies reporting the differences between participants' caries diagnosis process and decision-making with and without AI were included. Studies only reporting algorithm accuracy, in vitro studies, or studies without an outcome related to caries detection with AI support were excluded. No time and language limits were imposed. Outcomes regarding the influence of AI on the diagnostics process and decision-making were retrieved and narratively summarised.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>Thirteen publications were included. Number of participants ranged from 3 to 74, comprising dentists with varying experience and expertise and dental students. Results showed that AI enhances sensitivity, though its impact on specificity varies (10 studies). AI can promote unnecessary interventions for early-stage caries lesions (1 study). AI increased assessment time in two out of three cases (3 studies). AI's cost-effectiveness is uncertain, as greater sensitivity did not lead to better economic outcomes (1 study). In conclusion, AI has the potential to improve diagnostics and influence treatment choices, but current evidence is limited and inconsistent regarding its impact on specificity, decision quality, and cost-effectiveness. Longitudinal studies in clinical settings with long-term follow-ups are needed to understand AI's impact on decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":9620,"journal":{"name":"Caries Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12965728/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146104159","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Constanza E Fernández, Cristina Sáez-Villavicencio, Maitte Bravo-Lovera, Millaray Meza-Manríquez, José A Vergara-Muñoz, Juan Sebastian Lara
Background: Few health topics are as controversial as fluoride, and social media has become a powerful arena where health information and misinformation circulate and compete for attention. This study systematically examined fluoride-related posts across two major platforms (Instagram® and X™) in English and Spanish.
Methods: Using a standardized approach, we identified the first 200 publicly available posts related to fluoride and health on each platform and language (n=800 total). Posts were analyzed in duplicate, assessing perception (positive, negative, neutral), accuracy (accurate or non-accurate), format, account type, among others.
Results: Results revealed differences across language and platform. Spanish-language content was generally more accurate and conveyed a more positive tone, while English-language posts, particularly on X™, showed a higher prevalence of alarmist narratives. Engagement patterns varied by tone, post format and account type. Negative posts attracted more likes overall. Post wrtitten in Spanish generated lower engagement. Carousel and photo-video formats and professional accounts received substantially greater interaction.
Conclusion: These findings provide empirical evidence that language, source and format strongly influence the reach and resonance of fluoride posts. They also suggest that multilingual strategies using engaging formats and credible professional voices can enhance the impact of evidence-based fluoride communication and counter misinformation.
{"title":"Framing Fluoride Information on Social Media: A Cross-Language and Cross-Platform Analysis.","authors":"Constanza E Fernández, Cristina Sáez-Villavicencio, Maitte Bravo-Lovera, Millaray Meza-Manríquez, José A Vergara-Muñoz, Juan Sebastian Lara","doi":"10.1159/000550777","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000550777","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Few health topics are as controversial as fluoride, and social media has become a powerful arena where health information and misinformation circulate and compete for attention. This study systematically examined fluoride-related posts across two major platforms (Instagram® and X™) in English and Spanish.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a standardized approach, we identified the first 200 publicly available posts related to fluoride and health on each platform and language (n=800 total). Posts were analyzed in duplicate, assessing perception (positive, negative, neutral), accuracy (accurate or non-accurate), format, account type, among others.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results revealed differences across language and platform. Spanish-language content was generally more accurate and conveyed a more positive tone, while English-language posts, particularly on X™, showed a higher prevalence of alarmist narratives. Engagement patterns varied by tone, post format and account type. Negative posts attracted more likes overall. Post wrtitten in Spanish generated lower engagement. Carousel and photo-video formats and professional accounts received substantially greater interaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings provide empirical evidence that language, source and format strongly influence the reach and resonance of fluoride posts. They also suggest that multilingual strategies using engaging formats and credible professional voices can enhance the impact of evidence-based fluoride communication and counter misinformation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9620,"journal":{"name":"Caries Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146092297","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Susilena Arouche Costa, Cecilia Claudia Costa Ribeiro, Aretha Lorena Fonseca Cantanhede Carneiro, Luciano Tavares Ângelo Cintra, Cláudia Maria Coelho Alves, Érika Barbara Abreu Fonseca Thomaz, Soraia De Fátima Carvalho Souza
Introduction: Dental caries, the most prevalent noncommunicable disease (NCD) in adolescence, may represent a hidden link to systemic inflammatory processes, a common underlying mechanism shared by all major NCDs. Accordingly, this study investigated whether dental caries was associated with systemic inflammatory burden in adolescents.
Methods: This population-based study utilized data from the RPS Brazilian Birth Cohort Consortium, specifically the 18-19-year follow-up conducted in São Luís, Brazil (n = 441). The main exposures included the visible plaque index (VPI), number of decayed teeth, DMFT index (decayed, missing, and filling), and PUFA index. The outcome was the allostatic inflammatory load, calculated as the sum of biomarkers - IL-6, IL-18, IL-1β, TNF-α, and C-reactive protein (CRP) - that fell within the high-risk range (≥75th percentile of the sample distribution). Each biomarker contributed one point, resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 5. Crude and adjusted coefficients were estimated using regression models.
Results: The number of decayed teeth (β = 0.031, p = 0.015) and the VPI (β = 0.006, p = 0.001) were positively associated with higher allostatic inflammatory load scores. Among individual biomarkers, both the number of decayed teeth (β = 8.95, SE = 4.09, p = 0.02) and the VPI (β = 1.09, SE = 0.50, p = 0.03) were positively associated with IL-18 levels, whereas no significant associations were observed for the DMFT or PUFA indices (p > 0.05).
Conclusion: Dental caries was associated with systemic inflammation in adolescence, possibly reflecting shared underlying risk factors and highlighting the relevance of integrating oral health into strategies addressing common risk factors for non-communicable diseases.
目的:龋齿是青少年中最常见的非传染性疾病(NCD),它可能与全身性炎症过程存在隐藏联系,这是所有主要非传染性疾病共有的共同潜在机制。因此,本研究调查了龋病是否与青少年全身炎症负担有关。方法:这项基于人群的研究利用了RPS巴西出生队列联盟的数据,特别是在巴西 o Luís进行的18-19年随访(n = 441)。主要暴露包括可见菌斑指数(VPI)、龋数、DMFT指数(龋缺补)和PUFA指数。结果是适应性炎症负荷,计算为生物标志物- il -6、IL-18、IL-1β、TNF-α和c反应蛋白(CRP)的总和,这些生物标志物落在高风险范围内(≥样本分布的75百分位数)。每个生物标志物贡献1分,总分在0到5分之间。使用回归模型估计粗系数和调整系数。结果:龋齿数(β = 0.031, p = 0.015)和可见菌斑指数(β = 0.006, p = 0.001)与较高的适应性炎症负荷评分呈正相关。在个体生物标志物中,蛀牙数(β=8.95, SE=4.09, p=0.02)和可见菌斑指数(β=1.09, SE=0.50, p=0.03)与IL-18水平呈正相关,而DMFT和PUFA指数无显著相关性(p < 0.05)。结论:龋齿与青春期全身性炎症有关,可能反映了共同的潜在风险因素,并强调了将口腔健康纳入应对非传染性疾病常见风险因素的战略的相关性。
{"title":"Dental Caries and Systemic Inflammation in Adolescents: Findings from a Population-Based Study.","authors":"Susilena Arouche Costa, Cecilia Claudia Costa Ribeiro, Aretha Lorena Fonseca Cantanhede Carneiro, Luciano Tavares Ângelo Cintra, Cláudia Maria Coelho Alves, Érika Barbara Abreu Fonseca Thomaz, Soraia De Fátima Carvalho Souza","doi":"10.1159/000550646","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000550646","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dental caries, the most prevalent noncommunicable disease (NCD) in adolescence, may represent a hidden link to systemic inflammatory processes, a common underlying mechanism shared by all major NCDs. Accordingly, this study investigated whether dental caries was associated with systemic inflammatory burden in adolescents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This population-based study utilized data from the RPS Brazilian Birth Cohort Consortium, specifically the 18-19-year follow-up conducted in São Luís, Brazil (n = 441). The main exposures included the visible plaque index (VPI), number of decayed teeth, DMFT index (decayed, missing, and filling), and PUFA index. The outcome was the allostatic inflammatory load, calculated as the sum of biomarkers - IL-6, IL-18, IL-1β, TNF-α, and C-reactive protein (CRP) - that fell within the high-risk range (≥75th percentile of the sample distribution). Each biomarker contributed one point, resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 5. Crude and adjusted coefficients were estimated using regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of decayed teeth (β = 0.031, p = 0.015) and the VPI (β = 0.006, p = 0.001) were positively associated with higher allostatic inflammatory load scores. Among individual biomarkers, both the number of decayed teeth (β = 8.95, SE = 4.09, p = 0.02) and the VPI (β = 1.09, SE = 0.50, p = 0.03) were positively associated with IL-18 levels, whereas no significant associations were observed for the DMFT or PUFA indices (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dental caries was associated with systemic inflammation in adolescence, possibly reflecting shared underlying risk factors and highlighting the relevance of integrating oral health into strategies addressing common risk factors for non-communicable diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":9620,"journal":{"name":"Caries Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146084293","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Advances in next-generation sequencing and multi-omics approaches reinforced the concept of functional diversity within biofilm communities, revealing roles beyond bacterial taxonomy and highlighting metabolic and ecological mechanisms operating at the individual level rather than within isolated caries lesions. Moving toward new clinical solutions will require broader perspectives; to this end, we propose key directions to advance the translational potential of caries microbiome research. We present a perspective that connects ecological theory, molecular evidence, and clinical implications through three central topics: (1) microbial composition, (2) microbial function, and (3) individual-level characteristics.
Summary: From a compositional perspective, caries microbiome research should move beyond the search for bacterial culprits and instead consider the broader microbial ecosystem, including low-abundance and nonbacterial members (such as archaea). Within this framework, microbial taxa and functions should not be viewed as inherently "good" or "bad," but rather as context-dependent components of a dynamic ecosystem shaped by sustained environmental pressures. Functionally, the recurrent enrichment of pathways related to carbohydrate metabolism, sugar transport, and acid production likely reflects microbial adaptation to persistent sugar exposure rather than intrinsic virulence traits. This perspective suggests that progress in caries research depends on moving beyond disease-centered models toward understanding how microbial stability preserves oral health. At the individual level, individuals with previous caries experience may retain disease-associated microbial or functional signatures during remission, a phenomenon referred to here as a microbiological dysbiosis scar. This ecological memory may help explain why past caries experience remains one of the strongest predictors of future lesions and highlights the importance of incorporating individual history into the design and interpretation of caries microbiome studies. Integrating detailed clinical metadata with advanced bioinformatic approaches, including artificial intelligence, will be essential for establishing meaningful biological links.
Key messages: Progress in caries microbiome research depends on refining study design across microbial composition, functional, and individual levels. Strengthening the resilience of the oral microbiome rather than eliminating specific pathogens or the microbiome should be the central goal of caries microbiology. Moving from blame to balance is not merely semantic; it represents a fundamental shift in how we study, prevent, and manage dental caries.
{"title":"Caries Microbiome: Time to Move from Blame to Balance.","authors":"Naile Dame-Teixeira, Jéssica Luiza Mendonça Albuquerque de Melo, Clarissa Cavalcanti Fatturi Parolo","doi":"10.1159/000550472","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000550472","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advances in next-generation sequencing and multi-omics approaches reinforced the concept of functional diversity within biofilm communities, revealing roles beyond bacterial taxonomy and highlighting metabolic and ecological mechanisms operating at the individual level rather than within isolated caries lesions. Moving toward new clinical solutions will require broader perspectives; to this end, we propose key directions to advance the translational potential of caries microbiome research. We present a perspective that connects ecological theory, molecular evidence, and clinical implications through three central topics: (1) microbial composition, (2) microbial function, and (3) individual-level characteristics.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>From a compositional perspective, caries microbiome research should move beyond the search for bacterial culprits and instead consider the broader microbial ecosystem, including low-abundance and nonbacterial members (such as archaea). Within this framework, microbial taxa and functions should not be viewed as inherently \"good\" or \"bad,\" but rather as context-dependent components of a dynamic ecosystem shaped by sustained environmental pressures. Functionally, the recurrent enrichment of pathways related to carbohydrate metabolism, sugar transport, and acid production likely reflects microbial adaptation to persistent sugar exposure rather than intrinsic virulence traits. This perspective suggests that progress in caries research depends on moving beyond disease-centered models toward understanding how microbial stability preserves oral health. At the individual level, individuals with previous caries experience may retain disease-associated microbial or functional signatures during remission, a phenomenon referred to here as a microbiological dysbiosis scar. This ecological memory may help explain why past caries experience remains one of the strongest predictors of future lesions and highlights the importance of incorporating individual history into the design and interpretation of caries microbiome studies. Integrating detailed clinical metadata with advanced bioinformatic approaches, including artificial intelligence, will be essential for establishing meaningful biological links.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>Progress in caries microbiome research depends on refining study design across microbial composition, functional, and individual levels. Strengthening the resilience of the oral microbiome rather than eliminating specific pathogens or the microbiome should be the central goal of caries microbiology. Moving from blame to balance is not merely semantic; it represents a fundamental shift in how we study, prevent, and manage dental caries.</p>","PeriodicalId":9620,"journal":{"name":"Caries Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145984498","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-05-10DOI: 10.1159/000546194
Heather J Lundbeck, Vinay Pitchika, Paul Wilson, Daniela P Raggio, Jennifer Galloway, Waraf Al-Yaseen, Arindam Dutta, Rhiannon Jones, Shannu Bhatia, Glesni Guest-Rowlands, Kathryn Rowles, Falk Schwendicke, Nicola Innes
Introduction: Despite evidence supporting the clinical and cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive dentistry (MID), its adoption by the dental profession has been slow. A systematic review in 2016 found the majority of dentists intervene invasively earlier than necessary. The aim was to update this review of the assessment of dental practitioners' thresholds for providing restorative treatment for carious lesions given changes in evidence, teaching, and guidelines since 2016. The primary outcome was dental practitioners' restorative thresholds (the extent of the lesion when they would decide to intervene restoratively). Secondary outcomes were changes over time, caries risk, regional differences, and primary/permanent dentition.
Methods: This updated review replicated the methodology for the initial review, following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines (PROSPERO; CRD42023431906). Embase, MEDLINE (via PubMed), and Web of Science databases were searched (2016-2023) for observational studies reporting on dental clinicians' thresholds for restorative interventions in adults and children without language, time, or quality restrictions. Screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment (Modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale) were carried out independently and in duplicate. Meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model. No funding sought.
Results: Overall, 47 publications (30 from original publication and 17 from updated search) met the inclusion criteria and 65 datasets were included in the meta-analyses: 19 for occlusal lesions (16 pre-2016 and 3 post-2016; n = 11,946) and 46 for proximal lesions (38 pre-2016 and 8 post 2016; n = 20,428). The meta-analyses found that for occlusal lesions confined to enamel, there were fewer practitioners intervening invasively: 5% (95% confidence interval [CI]; 1-20%) post-2016, compared with 15% (95% CI; 9-23%) pre-2016. The opposite was found for proximal lesions with increased intervention levels, 27% (95% CI; 18-40%) for lesions confined to enamel post-2016, compared with 19% (95% CI; 12-29%) pre-2016, and for lesions extending up to the enamel-dentine junction 61% (95% CI; 36-81%) post-2016, compared with 39% (95% CI; 29-51%) pre-2016. There was variance between regions but too few studies to draw conclusions on individual regions.
Conclusion: There was a suggestion of less invasive treatment of occlusal lesions over time; however, this was not evident for proximal lesions.
{"title":"Dental Practitioners' Thresholds for Restorative Intervention in Carious Lesions: A Survey-Based Systematic Review Update.","authors":"Heather J Lundbeck, Vinay Pitchika, Paul Wilson, Daniela P Raggio, Jennifer Galloway, Waraf Al-Yaseen, Arindam Dutta, Rhiannon Jones, Shannu Bhatia, Glesni Guest-Rowlands, Kathryn Rowles, Falk Schwendicke, Nicola Innes","doi":"10.1159/000546194","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000546194","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><p>Introduction: Despite evidence supporting the clinical and cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive dentistry (MID), its adoption by the dental profession has been slow. A systematic review in 2016 found the majority of dentists intervene invasively earlier than necessary. The aim was to update this review of the assessment of dental practitioners' thresholds for providing restorative treatment for carious lesions given changes in evidence, teaching, and guidelines since 2016. The primary outcome was dental practitioners' restorative thresholds (the extent of the lesion when they would decide to intervene restoratively). Secondary outcomes were changes over time, caries risk, regional differences, and primary/permanent dentition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This updated review replicated the methodology for the initial review, following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines (PROSPERO; CRD42023431906). Embase, MEDLINE (via PubMed), and Web of Science databases were searched (2016-2023) for observational studies reporting on dental clinicians' thresholds for restorative interventions in adults and children without language, time, or quality restrictions. Screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment (Modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale) were carried out independently and in duplicate. Meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model. No funding sought.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 47 publications (30 from original publication and 17 from updated search) met the inclusion criteria and 65 datasets were included in the meta-analyses: 19 for occlusal lesions (16 pre-2016 and 3 post-2016; n = 11,946) and 46 for proximal lesions (38 pre-2016 and 8 post 2016; n = 20,428). The meta-analyses found that for occlusal lesions confined to enamel, there were fewer practitioners intervening invasively: 5% (95% confidence interval [CI]; 1-20%) post-2016, compared with 15% (95% CI; 9-23%) pre-2016. The opposite was found for proximal lesions with increased intervention levels, 27% (95% CI; 18-40%) for lesions confined to enamel post-2016, compared with 19% (95% CI; 12-29%) pre-2016, and for lesions extending up to the enamel-dentine junction 61% (95% CI; 36-81%) post-2016, compared with 39% (95% CI; 29-51%) pre-2016. There was variance between regions but too few studies to draw conclusions on individual regions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was a suggestion of less invasive treatment of occlusal lesions over time; however, this was not evident for proximal lesions. </p>.</p>","PeriodicalId":9620,"journal":{"name":"Caries Research","volume":" ","pages":"65-79"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12180769/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143964084","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-05-26DOI: 10.1159/000546513
Sarah Arangurem Karam, Francine Dos Santos Costa, Marcos Britto Correa, Bernardo Horta, Helen Gonçalves, Andréa Dâmaso Bertoldi, Flávio Fernando Demarco
Introduction: This study aimed to describe the prevalence of untreated dental caries in early childhood based on intergenerational socioeconomic data and to evaluate the association between intragenerational socioeconomic mobility data and untreated dental caries in children aged 4.
Methods: This is a longitudinal study. Data from three birth cohorts in Pelotas (1982, 1993, and 2015) were used. Data from three generations participating in these cohorts were evaluated. Untreated dental caries in childhood (2015 cohort) was considered the dependent variable. Family income and schooling were independent variables. The social mobility variable was categorized considering income and level of schooling data in the mothers' generation. Poisson regression was performed to estimate prevalence ratios (PRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).
Results: A total of 286 pairs of children and mothers/grandmothers were evaluated for the intergenerational sample (1982 and 1993 cohorts), and 3,633 mothers and children for the intragenerational sample (2015 cohort). In the intergenerational analysis, there was a reduction of about 10 percentage points in the prevalence of untreated caries in children from families that experienced upward/downward income mobility compared to children whose generations remained with lower income. In the intragenerational analysis, children belonging to the ascending/descending economic mobility groups had twice the prevalence of untreated dental caries compared to those always with higher salaries (PR 2.04; 95% CI 1.52-2.71 and PR 2.07; 95% CI 1.56-2.74, respectively).
Conclusion: Findings demonstrate an association between untreated dental caries in children and family socioeconomic status, including their mothers' income/education mobility. Thus, intervening in early childhood socioeconomic conditions is needed to improve children's oral health.
{"title":"Influence of Social Mobility on Untreated Dental Caries at Age 4: Intergenerational and Intragenerational Analysis.","authors":"Sarah Arangurem Karam, Francine Dos Santos Costa, Marcos Britto Correa, Bernardo Horta, Helen Gonçalves, Andréa Dâmaso Bertoldi, Flávio Fernando Demarco","doi":"10.1159/000546513","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000546513","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to describe the prevalence of untreated dental caries in early childhood based on intergenerational socioeconomic data and to evaluate the association between intragenerational socioeconomic mobility data and untreated dental caries in children aged 4.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a longitudinal study. Data from three birth cohorts in Pelotas (1982, 1993, and 2015) were used. Data from three generations participating in these cohorts were evaluated. Untreated dental caries in childhood (2015 cohort) was considered the dependent variable. Family income and schooling were independent variables. The social mobility variable was categorized considering income and level of schooling data in the mothers' generation. Poisson regression was performed to estimate prevalence ratios (PRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 286 pairs of children and mothers/grandmothers were evaluated for the intergenerational sample (1982 and 1993 cohorts), and 3,633 mothers and children for the intragenerational sample (2015 cohort). In the intergenerational analysis, there was a reduction of about 10 percentage points in the prevalence of untreated caries in children from families that experienced upward/downward income mobility compared to children whose generations remained with lower income. In the intragenerational analysis, children belonging to the ascending/descending economic mobility groups had twice the prevalence of untreated dental caries compared to those always with higher salaries (PR 2.04; 95% CI 1.52-2.71 and PR 2.07; 95% CI 1.56-2.74, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings demonstrate an association between untreated dental caries in children and family socioeconomic status, including their mothers' income/education mobility. Thus, intervening in early childhood socioeconomic conditions is needed to improve children's oral health.</p>","PeriodicalId":9620,"journal":{"name":"Caries Research","volume":" ","pages":"54-64"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144149316","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}