Methodological considerations in the study of perceived discrimination at work and its association with workers health and occupational outcomes: A scoping review.

IF 1.2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Medwave Pub Date : 2024-05-22 DOI:10.5867/medwave.2024.04.2910
Gonzalo Bravo, Alejandra Fuentes-Garcia, María Arriagada, Héctor Castellucci
{"title":"Methodological considerations in the study of perceived discrimination at work and its association with workers health and occupational outcomes: A scoping review.","authors":"Gonzalo Bravo, Alejandra Fuentes-Garcia, María Arriagada, Héctor Castellucci","doi":"10.5867/medwave.2024.04.2910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Perceived workplace discrimination is a complex phenomenon involving unfair treatment in the workplace based on personal characteristics such as age, ethnicity, gender, or disability. The objective of this study is to explore the association of perceived workplace discrimination with health and occupational outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines and the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology, a scoping review of articles published between 2000 and 2022 was conducted in databases such as Pubmed, Scopus, and PsyInfo. Inclusion criteria focused on studies exploring perceived workplace discrimination among workers, excluding those on patients, students, or the general population, and articles not written in English or Spanish.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 9,871 articles identified, 102 met the criteria and were analyzed. Research showed a progressive increase in the study of perceived workplace discrimination, with a majority of studies in North America and Europe and a predominance of cross-sectional designs. Most studies did not clearly define the concept of perceived workplace discrimination nor report the psychometric characteristics of the measurement instruments. A significant association was found between perceived discrimination and negative outcomes in workers' mental and physical health, as well as a negative impact on job satisfaction and an increase in absenteeism. Additionally, sociodemographic characteristics such as race/ethnicity, gender, and age influenced the perception of discrimination.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review confirms that perceived workplace discrimination significantly impacts the health and job satisfaction of workers, with particular detriment in minorities and women. Despite an increase in research over the last two decades, there remains a lack of consistency in the definition and measurement of the phenomenon. Most studies have used cross-sectional designs, and there is a notable absence of research in the Latin American context.</p>","PeriodicalId":18597,"journal":{"name":"Medwave","volume":"24 4","pages":"e2910"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medwave","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5867/medwave.2024.04.2910","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Perceived workplace discrimination is a complex phenomenon involving unfair treatment in the workplace based on personal characteristics such as age, ethnicity, gender, or disability. The objective of this study is to explore the association of perceived workplace discrimination with health and occupational outcomes.

Methods: Following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines and the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology, a scoping review of articles published between 2000 and 2022 was conducted in databases such as Pubmed, Scopus, and PsyInfo. Inclusion criteria focused on studies exploring perceived workplace discrimination among workers, excluding those on patients, students, or the general population, and articles not written in English or Spanish.

Results: Of the 9,871 articles identified, 102 met the criteria and were analyzed. Research showed a progressive increase in the study of perceived workplace discrimination, with a majority of studies in North America and Europe and a predominance of cross-sectional designs. Most studies did not clearly define the concept of perceived workplace discrimination nor report the psychometric characteristics of the measurement instruments. A significant association was found between perceived discrimination and negative outcomes in workers' mental and physical health, as well as a negative impact on job satisfaction and an increase in absenteeism. Additionally, sociodemographic characteristics such as race/ethnicity, gender, and age influenced the perception of discrimination.

Conclusions: This review confirms that perceived workplace discrimination significantly impacts the health and job satisfaction of workers, with particular detriment in minorities and women. Despite an increase in research over the last two decades, there remains a lack of consistency in the definition and measurement of the phenomenon. Most studies have used cross-sectional designs, and there is a notable absence of research in the Latin American context.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工作中感知到的歧视及其与工人健康和职业结果的关系研究中的方法考虑:范围综述。
导言:感知到的工作场所歧视是一种复杂的现象,涉及工作场所中基于年龄、种族、性别或残疾等个人特征的不公平待遇。本研究旨在探讨感知到的工作场所歧视与健康和职业结果之间的关系:按照 PRISMA-ScR 指南和乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)的方法,在 Pubmed、Scopus 和 PsyInfo 等数据库中对 2000 年至 2022 年间发表的文章进行了范围界定。纳入标准主要是探讨工人感知到的工作场所歧视的研究,不包括以病人、学生或普通人群为对象的研究,也不包括非英语或西班牙语撰写的文章:在确定的 9871 篇文章中,有 102 篇符合标准并进行了分析。研究表明,对感知到的工作场所歧视的研究在逐步增加,大多数研究在北美和欧洲进行,并且以横断面设计为主。大多数研究没有明确界定感知到的职场歧视的概念,也没有报告测量工具的心理测量特征。研究发现,感知到的歧视与工人身心健康的负面结果、对工作满意度的负面影响以及缺勤率的增加之间存在重要关联。此外,种族/民族、性别和年龄等社会人口特征也会影响对歧视的感知:本综述证实,感知到的工作场所歧视会严重影响工人的健康和工作满意度,尤其是对少数群体和女性不利。尽管在过去二十年中,相关研究不断增加,但对这一现象的定义和测量仍缺乏一致性。大多数研究都采用了横断面设计,而且明显缺乏针对拉丁美洲的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medwave
Medwave MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
50
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medwave is a peer-reviewed, biomedical and public health journal. Since its foundation in 2001 (Volume 1) it has always been an online only, open access publication that does not charge subscription or reader fees. Since January 2011 (Volume 11, Number 1), all articles are peer-reviewed. Without losing sight of the importance of evidence-based approach and methodological soundness, the journal accepts for publication articles that focus on providing updates for clinical practice, review and analysis articles on topics such as ethics, public health and health policy; clinical, social and economic health determinants; clinical and health research findings from all of the major disciplines of medicine, medical science and public health. The journal does not publish basic science manuscripts or experiments conducted on animals. Until March 2013, Medwave was publishing 11-12 numbers a year. Each issue would be posted on the homepage on day 1 of each month, except for Chile’s summer holiday when the issue would cover two months. Starting from April 2013, Medwave adopted the continuous mode of publication, which means that the copyedited accepted articles are posted on the journal’s homepage as they are ready. They are then collated in the respective issue and included in the Past Issues section.
期刊最新文献
The first attending physicians of the San Juan de Dios Hospital in La Serena and the organization of the sanitary taxation in the mid-19th century. Key elements for understanding and developing qualitative research for health professionals. Translation and cultural adaptation of the Long Coronavirus Disease (COVID) Symptom and Impact Tools for the Chilean population. Forensic and legal medicine in Chile: Cinderella without a prince. Preventive behaviors for COVID-19 in Chile: Lessons from a population follow-up for 2021 and 2022.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1