Demographic Characteristics, Perinatal Smoking Patterns, and Risk for Neonatal Health Complications Among Pregnant Smokers in the United States Who Begin Using Electronic Cigarettes During Pregnancy: A Descriptive Study Using Population-Based Surveillance Data.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Nicotine & Tobacco Research Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1093/ntr/ntae119
Hui Nian, Rachel Odland, Samantha Mindlin, Lin Ammar, Hilary Tindle, Angela M Miller, Kelli K Ryckman, Ethan Xie, Tina V Hartert, Brittney M Snyder, Steven M Brunwasser, Pingsheng Wu
{"title":"Demographic Characteristics, Perinatal Smoking Patterns, and Risk for Neonatal Health Complications Among Pregnant Smokers in the United States Who Begin Using Electronic Cigarettes During Pregnancy: A Descriptive Study Using Population-Based Surveillance Data.","authors":"Hui Nian, Rachel Odland, Samantha Mindlin, Lin Ammar, Hilary Tindle, Angela M Miller, Kelli K Ryckman, Ethan Xie, Tina V Hartert, Brittney M Snyder, Steven M Brunwasser, Pingsheng Wu","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntae119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Health agencies have called for research evaluating e-cigarette (EC) use in supporting prenatal smoking cessation. This study aimed to describe (1) the characteristics of smokers who begin using electronic cigarettes (ECs) during pregnancy, (2) how frequently smokers reduce or eliminate pre- and post-natal combustible cigarette (CC) use, and (3) the risk for neonatal health complications among smokers who initiate ECs during pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Aims and methods: </strong>Pregnant women using CCs exclusively during prepregnancy, who participated in a U.S. surveillance study, were classified by their reported late-pregnancy smoking behavior as CC-exclusive users, EC initiators, or quitters. EC initiators were further subclassified as dual users (used both ECs and CCs) or EC replacers (used ECs exclusively).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 29 505 pregnant smokers, 1.5% reported using ECs during the last three pregnancy months. Among them, 29.7% became EC-exclusive users. EC initiators were disproportionately non-Hispanic White. Relative to quitters, EC initiators had lower income, were less likely to be married, have intended pregnancies, receive first-trimester prenatal care, and participate in a federal assistance program. Compared to CC-exclusive users, EC initiators overall, and dual users specifically, were more likely to reduce pre- and post-natal CC usage relative to prepregnancy levels. EC initiators' risk for neonatal health complications fell between quitters and CC-exclusive users, though the differences were not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although EC initiators reduced CC use more than CC-exclusive users, only 29.7% reported complete CC cessation, and there was insufficient evidence of reduction in neonatal health complications relative to CC-exclusive users. Currently, ECs should not be considered a viable gestational smoking cessation strategy.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Health agencies have identified a critical need for research evaluating the use of e-cigarettes in supporting prenatal smoking cessation. Using the U.S. Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System surveillance study data, we provide real-world evidence that prenatal e-cigarette initiation as a smoking cessation tool is used infrequently among pregnant CCs smokers. Most using e-cigarettes in the last 3 months of pregnancy also used CCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11494498/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae119","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Health agencies have called for research evaluating e-cigarette (EC) use in supporting prenatal smoking cessation. This study aimed to describe (1) the characteristics of smokers who begin using electronic cigarettes (ECs) during pregnancy, (2) how frequently smokers reduce or eliminate pre- and post-natal combustible cigarette (CC) use, and (3) the risk for neonatal health complications among smokers who initiate ECs during pregnancy.

Aims and methods: Pregnant women using CCs exclusively during prepregnancy, who participated in a U.S. surveillance study, were classified by their reported late-pregnancy smoking behavior as CC-exclusive users, EC initiators, or quitters. EC initiators were further subclassified as dual users (used both ECs and CCs) or EC replacers (used ECs exclusively).

Results: Of 29 505 pregnant smokers, 1.5% reported using ECs during the last three pregnancy months. Among them, 29.7% became EC-exclusive users. EC initiators were disproportionately non-Hispanic White. Relative to quitters, EC initiators had lower income, were less likely to be married, have intended pregnancies, receive first-trimester prenatal care, and participate in a federal assistance program. Compared to CC-exclusive users, EC initiators overall, and dual users specifically, were more likely to reduce pre- and post-natal CC usage relative to prepregnancy levels. EC initiators' risk for neonatal health complications fell between quitters and CC-exclusive users, though the differences were not statistically significant.

Conclusions: Although EC initiators reduced CC use more than CC-exclusive users, only 29.7% reported complete CC cessation, and there was insufficient evidence of reduction in neonatal health complications relative to CC-exclusive users. Currently, ECs should not be considered a viable gestational smoking cessation strategy.

Implications: Health agencies have identified a critical need for research evaluating the use of e-cigarettes in supporting prenatal smoking cessation. Using the U.S. Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System surveillance study data, we provide real-world evidence that prenatal e-cigarette initiation as a smoking cessation tool is used infrequently among pregnant CCs smokers. Most using e-cigarettes in the last 3 months of pregnancy also used CCs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国怀孕期间开始使用电子香烟的孕妇的人口特征、围产期吸烟模式和新生儿健康并发症风险:利用人群监测数据进行的描述性研究。
导言:卫生机构呼吁开展研究,评估电子烟(EC)在支持产前戒烟方面的使用情况。本研究旨在描述:(a)孕期开始使用电子烟的吸烟者的特征;(b)吸烟者减少或停止产前和产后使用可燃卷烟(CC)的频率;以及(c)孕期开始使用电子烟的吸烟者出现新生儿健康并发症的风险:方法:参与美国一项监测研究、在孕前完全使用可燃卷烟的孕妇,根据其报告的孕晚期吸烟行为被分为完全使用可燃卷烟者、开始使用可燃卷烟者或戒烟者。开始使用EC者还被进一步细分为双重使用者(同时使用EC和CC)或EC替代者(只使用EC):结果:在 29 505 名怀孕吸烟者中,有 1.5%表示在怀孕的最后 3 个月中使用过电子烟。结果:在 29 505 名吸烟孕妇中,有 1.5%的人表示在过去 3 个月中使用过电子镇静剂,其中 29.7%成为电子镇静剂的唯一使用者。开始使用电子烟者主要是非西班牙裔白人。与戒烟者相比,开始使用避孕药者的收入较低,已婚、打算怀孕、接受第一胎产前护理和参加联邦援助计划的可能性较小。与 CC 排他性使用者相比,EC 初始使用者(特别是双重使用者)更有可能在产前和产后将 CC 使用量降至孕前水平。开始使用避孕药者患新生儿健康并发症的风险介于戒烟者和CC专用药使用者之间,但差异不具有统计学意义:结论:虽然开始使用安眠药的孕妇比使用独家安眠药的孕妇减少了更多使用安眠药的次数,但只有29.7%的孕妇报告完全停止使用安眠药,而且与使用独家安眠药的孕妇相比,没有足够的证据表明安眠药减少了新生儿健康并发症。目前,ECs不应被视为一种可行的妊娠戒烟策略:卫生机构认为,亟需对电子烟在支持产前戒烟方面的应用进行评估研究。利用美国妊娠风险评估监测系统的监测研究数据,我们提供了真实世界的证据,证明产前使用电子烟作为戒烟工具在吸可燃卷烟的孕妇中并不常见。大多数在孕期最后三个月使用电子烟的人也曾吸过可燃卷烟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
期刊最新文献
The Context of the Emergency Department as a Location for a Smoking Cessation Intervention-Process Evaluation Findings From the Cessation of Smoking Trial in the Emergency Department Trial. Behavioral Interventions for Tobacco Cessation in Low and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Effects of E-Cigarettes on Combustible Cigarette Smoking Among Adults with Opioid Use Disorder on Buprenorphine: Single Arm ERASER Pilot Trial. Vaping and smoking cue reactivity in young adult non-smoking electronic cigarette users: A functional neuroimaging study. Do-it-yourself flavored capsule cigarettes: Exploiting potential regulatory loopholes?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1